Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Caprico International PTE Ltd v. Commissioner of Customs and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that when an importer abandons goods and ownership passes to the supplier, the supplier can clear the goods upon paying customs duty and interest but is liable for a proportionate share of demurrage charges incurred due to delay.
Baby Suhani Kapoor v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition directing admission for a student with medical and financial challenges in 11th Class for the next academic session, rejecting late admission in the current year.
M/S V-GUARD INDUSTRIES LTD v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the order deeming trademark opposition abandoned due to late filing of evidence caused by technical failure, emphasizing liberal interpretation of procedural rules to protect substantive rights.
Mr. Nishant Solanki, Advocate. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court directed issuance of police clearance certificate to a petitioner acquitted in criminal proceedings and divorced, rejecting withholding based on prior pending cases.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. M/S Steel Authority of India Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal and held that CSR expenditure incurred prior to the Finance Act 2014 amendment is deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, as Explanation 2 applies prospectively and such expenditure is not capital in nature.
Amarpal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India through Secretary MHA & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the CRPF authorities to decide the petitioners' pending representation regarding Training Allowance within a stipulated time and communicate the decision in writing.
Jitin Prakash v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the National Commission for Scheduled Castes to expedite its inquiry into the petitioner's discrimination complaint and dismissed the writ petition without commenting on merits.
Shyam Ali v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld removal of a security force recruit for false declaration of pending criminal case despite subsequent acquittal, emphasizing integrity requirements and procedural propriety during recruitment.
Suman v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed provisional recognition of the petitioner as spouse of respondent no.3 for ex-servicemen benefits despite matrimonial dispute, subject to completion of formalities and without respondent’s cooperation.
Dr. Shilpi Agarwal & Anr. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of promotion to petitioners under the DACP Scheme due to non-fulfillment of performance benchmarks, affirming that promotion is contingent on eligibility criteria and not a matter of right.
Tej Singh v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court quashed disciplinary penalty and recovery imposed on an FCI employee for storage losses, holding that procedural lapses and lack of evidence of his liability warranted setting aside the orders.
Ved Prakash @ Mistri v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an undertrial accused in an NDPS case involving commercial quantity after five years of custody, applying Supreme Court guidelines with conditions to ensure trial attendance.
Parsu Ram v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted parole to a convict to enable him to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, affirming the right to engage counsel of choice despite availability of free legal aid in jail.
Laxmi Kant Sharma & Anr. v. Kela Devi @ Kailashi Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' civil revision petition seeking to set aside an ex parte decree, holding that their negligence and lack of sufficient cause did not justify interference under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.
Nishant Khatri v. Bar Council of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that advocates cannot be debarred for failing to clear the AIBE within two years due to non-conduct of the exam and upheld the Bar Council of India's exemption of the affected period.
Virendra Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 92(i) of the Air Force Act, 1950 and Air Force Order 03/2013, dismissing the petition challenging a maintenance order granted to the petitioner’s wife and child.
Parvez Alam v. State of Delhi (NCT) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 279 and 337 IPC following a voluntary settlement between the parties in a motor vehicle accident case, emphasizing the court's power to quash proceedings in private disputes where continuation serves no useful purpose.
Gaurav Baisoya v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an independent specialist board for a Coast Guard recruitment candidate due to contradictory medical reports, making the board's decision final and binding.
M/S V-GUARD INDUSTRIES LTD. v. M/S LIVGUARD ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD AND ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that a brief delay in submitting opposition evidence due to technical issues does not amount to abandonment under the Trade Marks Rules.
Tata Capital Financial Services Limited v. Solitaire Automotive & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a loan and guarantee agreement involving Tata Capital and Solitaire Automotive.