Delhi High Court
60,983 judgments
CEPCO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. TEWARI RESTAURANT PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that non-compliance with procedural requirements under the Commercial Courts Act is curable and a suit wrongly filed as non-commercial can be re-numbered and proceeded with as a commercial suit without rejection.
Shri Ramsujan Patel & Ors. v. Shri Dayanand Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the MACT's order on territorial jurisdiction and condoned delay to allow the petitioners' motor accident claim to be adjudicated on merits.
Dabur India Limited v. The Advertising Standards Council of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of interim injunction against ASCI's communication, holding that health-related advertisement claims must be scientifically substantiated and self-regulatory bodies have recognized authority to enforce advertising codes.
Sukruti Dugal v. Jahnavi Dugal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to vacate the interim status quo order in a partition suit involving alleged HUF properties, holding that factual disputes including the validity of a prior settlement decree require trial and cannot be decided at the interim stage.
Sh. Subhash Arora v. M/S Dimension Architecture (P) Limited
The Delhi High Court held that an auction purchaser under the SARFAESI Act is neither a necessary nor proper party to a suit for specific performance and dismissed the application for impleadment.
M/S SHIVSHAKTI ENTERPRISES Engineer & Contractor v. M/S TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of an 85-day delay in refiling a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, emphasizing the Court's discretion to condone delay in refiling when the initial filing was within limitation and the delay was reasonably explained.
V-Guard Industries Ltd v. Rakesh Malhotra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that suits involving the same parties and substantially the same subject matter pending in another court must be stayed under Section 10 CPC to avoid conflicting judgments and multiplicity of proceedings.
Namita Gupta v. Suraj Holdings Limited
The Delhi High Court held that Section 24 CPC applies to suits relating to commercial disputes and that only the High Court can transfer such suits to Commercial Courts, setting aside unauthorized transfers by lower courts and directing transfer under Section 24 CPC to preserve proceedings.
Novartis AG & Anr. v. Natco Pharma Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the interlocutory injunction restraining Natco Pharma from exploiting Novartis's patent on Ceritinib, rejecting the defendant's plea to vacate the injunction based on non-disclosure of a refused Divisional Application.
Bijender@Vishnu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted parole to a life-convict to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, affirming the right of a convict to pursue legal remedies through counsel of choice under the Delhi Prisons Rules.
Caprico International PTE Ltd v. Commissioner of Customs and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that when an importer abandons goods and ownership passes to the supplier, the supplier can clear the goods upon paying customs duty and interest but is liable for a proportionate share of demurrage charges incurred due to delay.
Baby Suhani Kapoor v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition directing admission for a student with medical and financial challenges in 11th Class for the next academic session, rejecting late admission in the current year.
M/S V-GUARD INDUSTRIES LTD v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the order deeming trademark opposition abandoned due to late filing of evidence caused by technical failure, emphasizing liberal interpretation of procedural rules to protect substantive rights.
Mr. Nishant Solanki, Advocate. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court directed issuance of police clearance certificate to a petitioner acquitted in criminal proceedings and divorced, rejecting withholding based on prior pending cases.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. M/S Steel Authority of India Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal and held that CSR expenditure incurred prior to the Finance Act 2014 amendment is deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, as Explanation 2 applies prospectively and such expenditure is not capital in nature.
Amarpal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India through Secretary MHA & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the CRPF authorities to decide the petitioners' pending representation regarding Training Allowance within a stipulated time and communicate the decision in writing.
Jitin Prakash v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the National Commission for Scheduled Castes to expedite its inquiry into the petitioner's discrimination complaint and dismissed the writ petition without commenting on merits.
Shyam Ali v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld removal of a security force recruit for false declaration of pending criminal case despite subsequent acquittal, emphasizing integrity requirements and procedural propriety during recruitment.
Suman v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed provisional recognition of the petitioner as spouse of respondent no.3 for ex-servicemen benefits despite matrimonial dispute, subject to completion of formalities and without respondent’s cooperation.
Dr. Shilpi Agarwal & Anr. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of promotion to petitioners under the DACP Scheme due to non-fulfillment of performance benchmarks, affirming that promotion is contingent on eligibility criteria and not a matter of right.