Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Abhishek Verma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the CBI's petition to summon and examine a material witness via video conferencing under Section 311 Cr.P.C., setting aside the trial court's refusal to do so, emphasizing the need to balance justice and trial timelines.
Sempersol Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's bid in a government tender for failing mandatory past performance criteria and violating CVC rules on OEM and reseller participation, emphasizing limited judicial interference in technical tender evaluations.
Kamal Bhasin v. Election Tribunal of ICAI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that only election contestants qualify as aggrieved persons under the Election Tribunal Rules, and a non-contesting complainant lacks locus standi to challenge election-related complaints.
Banwari Lal Meena v. Lok Sabha Secretariat
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging non-appointment under ST reservation due to inordinate delay and expiry of the select panel validity, holding that delay and laches bar belated claims without satisfactory explanation.
Hermes International & Anr. v. Crimzon Fashion Accessories Private Limited
The Delhi High Court declared the plaintiffs' 'H' trademark as a well-known trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, after finding that all statutory criteria for well-known status were satisfied.
Mushtaque Ahmad v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking to shift the Thursday weekly bazaar at Shastri Park, holding that the location and conduct of weekly bazaars are policy matters beyond judicial interference absent guideline violations.
Rajan Sood & Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of land acquisition and dismissed the appeal against demolition, holding that acquisition proceedings have not lapsed where symbolic possession and compensation deposit exist, and Section 48 representations do not bar demolition.
Jaidev Singh Kapoor v. Guru Harkrishan Public School (New Delhi) Society and Ors.
Delhi High Court directed Guru Harkrishan Public School to promptly release the petitioner’s terminal benefits and salary arrears as per revised pay norms following retirement.
Mukul Shyam v. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination for failure to qualify a mandatory computer test, holding that concealment of material facts and misrepresentation disentitled the petitioner from equitable relief.
PC Commissioner of Income Tax – 20 v. M/S Fish Poultry and Egg Marketing Committee
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption under Section 10(26AAB) of the Income Tax Act for income earned by an Agricultural Produce Market Committee from regulating markets dealing with fish, poultry, and eggs, relying on the broad definition of agricultural produce under the Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998.
Anita Saklani & Ors. v. National Insurance Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the MACT's dismissal of a motor accident claim for non-filing of documents, directing a fresh hearing with a liberal and sensitive approach towards the claimants.
Shri Hukum Singh & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the claim for compensation to the Railway Claims Tribunal, holding that non-seizure of journey tickets does not bar claims and contributory negligence is not a defense under no-fault liability for railway accident deaths.
EX HC GD MAHAVIR PRASAD v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking to quash recovery of excess pension by directing the petitioner to make a representation citing the Supreme Court judgment, which the respondents must decide within a stipulated time.
R.R. Patil Foundation v. Archaeological Survey of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the ASI’s policy restricting cultural events at protected monuments to government bodies, directing petitioners to co-organize with the State of Maharashtra for permission.
Dinesh Sharma v. Ramjas School and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the upgrading of the petitioner’s downgraded ACRs and ordered a review DPC to reconsider his promotion following the termination of the respondent principal for illegal activities.
Md Iqbal Ahmed v. Mohd Ashfaq
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to file additional documents after completion of evidence, holding that such late filing without proper pleadings and causing prejudice is impermissible.
Raghav Sachdeva v. Gaurav Chawla
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's order rejecting the written statement for lack of condonation application, directing it to be taken on record with costs, emphasizing a lenient approach towards procedural delays in pleadings.
Anubhav Jain v. Satish Kumar Jain & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to re-examine the registration of the "Jain Shikanji" device mark, directing the Registrar to consider objections on deceptive similarity and user evidence with reasoned orders, emphasizing the necessity of distinctiveness and procedural fairness in trade mark registration.
Desh Raj Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the respondents accepted the petitioner's voluntary retirement application and issued the discharge certificate in compliance with the applicable pension rules.
Himmat Singh Chauhan v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking shifting from the New Pension Scheme to the Old Pension Scheme after respondents credited the petitioner’s contributions to his GPF account, rendering the claim infructuous.