Delhi High Court
61,224 judgments
Amit Kumar v. Punjab National Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal from service, directing the petitioner to exhaust the statutory appeal remedy under Punjab National Bank Regulations within an extended time.
ALPHA INFOLAB PVT LTD v. NATIONAL INTERNET EXCHANGE OF INDIA AND ANR
Delhi High Court held that termination of distributorship on vague national security grounds without prior notice violates natural justice and directed issuance of a show cause notice with opportunity to respond.
Madan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 307 IPC but reduced the sentence to the period already served, considering the long delay and appellant's circumstances.
M/S AIRPETS RELOCATION SERVICES (P) LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that pet owners alone are legally accountable for pet import/export formalities, and authorized representatives may act on their behalf as per the Office Memorandum dated 15th July, 2020, dismissing the petition challenging earlier restrictive guidelines.
Ritu Johari v. Vineet Taneja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Respondent's application to modify the order appointing child counsellors and refused to postpone the Family Court hearing, emphasizing expeditious adjudication in the long-pending guardianship matter.
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. KRISHAN LAL GUPTA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and upheld the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal's award of compensation to the deceased's family, rejecting the insurer's plea of collusion and affirming liability despite the driver being the deceased's son.
Rajat Enterprises v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a debarment order against a contractor for failure to comply with natural justice and for issuing an order beyond the scope of the show cause notice.
Anil Kumar v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking re-evaluation and rounding off of marks in the Delhi Higher Judicial Services Examination, holding that the rules expressly prohibit such relief and no material error was shown.
Anil Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner's legal notice as a representation and decide it within four weeks, ensuring timely administrative action.
Mahinder Kumar alias Mahinder Nikham & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute where the parties had amicably settled and resumed cohabitation.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Abhishek Verma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the CBI's petition to summon and examine a material witness via video conferencing under Section 311 Cr.P.C., setting aside the trial court's refusal to do so, emphasizing the need to balance justice and trial timelines.
Sempersol Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's bid in a government tender for failing mandatory past performance criteria and violating CVC rules on OEM and reseller participation, emphasizing limited judicial interference in technical tender evaluations.
Kamal Bhasin v. Election Tribunal of ICAI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that only election contestants qualify as aggrieved persons under the Election Tribunal Rules, and a non-contesting complainant lacks locus standi to challenge election-related complaints.
Banwari Lal Meena v. Lok Sabha Secretariat
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging non-appointment under ST reservation due to inordinate delay and expiry of the select panel validity, holding that delay and laches bar belated claims without satisfactory explanation.
Hermes International & Anr. v. Crimzon Fashion Accessories Private Limited
The Delhi High Court declared the plaintiffs' 'H' trademark as a well-known trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, after finding that all statutory criteria for well-known status were satisfied.
Mushtaque Ahmad v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking to shift the Thursday weekly bazaar at Shastri Park, holding that the location and conduct of weekly bazaars are policy matters beyond judicial interference absent guideline violations.
Rajan Sood & Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of land acquisition and dismissed the appeal against demolition, holding that acquisition proceedings have not lapsed where symbolic possession and compensation deposit exist, and Section 48 representations do not bar demolition.
Jaidev Singh Kapoor v. Guru Harkrishan Public School (New Delhi) Society and Ors.
Delhi High Court directed Guru Harkrishan Public School to promptly release the petitioner’s terminal benefits and salary arrears as per revised pay norms following retirement.
Mukul Shyam v. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination for failure to qualify a mandatory computer test, holding that concealment of material facts and misrepresentation disentitled the petitioner from equitable relief.
PC Commissioner of Income Tax – 20 v. M/S Fish Poultry and Egg Marketing Committee
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption under Section 10(26AAB) of the Income Tax Act for income earned by an Agricultural Produce Market Committee from regulating markets dealing with fish, poultry, and eggs, relying on the broad definition of agricultural produce under the Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998.