Delhi High Court

29,474 judgments

Year:

Luxembourg Brands S.A R.L & Anr v. G.M Pens International Pvt Ltd

10 Feb 2023 · Amit Bansal · CS(COMM) 1120/2016

The Delhi High Court held that in a suit for rendition of accounts, documents submitted to a court-appointed auditor must be disclosed to the plaintiffs for verification, rejecting the defendant's claim of confidentiality.

civil appeal_allowed Significant rendition of accounts trademark infringement confidentiality independent auditor

Kanika Mittal v. Kavita Sardana & Anr.

10 Feb 2023 · Gaurang Kanth · 2023:DHC:1123

The Delhi High Court upheld a possession decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC based on clear admissions by the tenant and valid lease termination, dismissing the tenant's appeal for lack of defense and delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admissions lease termination landlord-tenant dispute

Sh. Hakumat Rai v. Sh. Madhur Krishan Dhingra

10 Feb 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:1290

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant for failure to file leave to defend within the statutory period despite due service and opportunity, dismissing the tenant's revision petition challenging the eviction order.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction leave to defend service of summons

राज्य राजधानी दिल्ली सरकार v. सुशील कुमार गुप्ता

10 Feb 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, acquisition lapses only if both possession is not taken and compensation is not paid, overruling earlier contrary precedent and allowing the government's appeal.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 possession

Rajasthan Government v. Sushil Kumar Gupta & Ors.

10 Feb 2023 · M. R. Shah; C. T. Ravikumar

The Supreme Court held that unauthorized possession of land taken before the 2013 Act without payment of compensation does not amount to deemed acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Act, overruling earlier contrary precedent.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act deemed acquisition unauthorized possession land acquisition

Nand Kishore v. Brig P S Julka

09 Feb 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:1036

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s rejection of the petitioner’s application to file documents late in a civil suit due to absence of pleadings and insufficient explanation for delay.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 1A CPC late filing of documents evidence beyond pleadings written statement

Deepti Bhardwaj v. Rajeev Bhardwaj

09 Feb 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Vikas Mahajan · 2023:DHC:1004-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a divorce decree granted on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, holding that repeated verbal abuse and humiliating conduct by the wife constituted mental cruelty justifying dissolution of marriage.

family appeal_dismissed Significant cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act mental cruelty

S.K. Beri v. Deepak Beri & Ors.

09 Feb 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:991

The Delhi High Court held that a defendant with conflicting interests cannot be impleaded as legal representative of a deceased plaintiff, allowing review to implead only the non-conflicting legal heir.

civil appeal_allowed Significant legal representative right to sue Order XXII Rule 3(1) CPC Order XXII Rule 5 CPC

M/S JUTLA & CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR.

09 Feb 2023 · Vibhu BakhrU; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:926-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a VAT refund claim cannot be deemed allowed without the petitioner issuing a statutory notice under Section 74(8) of the DVAT Act, and directed the tax authority to decide objections afresh following Tribunal remand.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 74 objections refund claim deeming provision

Natasha Narwal & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Feb 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:988

Delhi High Court directed enhanced communication, medical, and legal facilities for inmates during COVID-19, balancing health safety with prisoners' rights, and disposed of the petition as pandemic restrictions eased.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant physical mulaqats e-mulaqats COVID-19 pandemic prisoners' rights

Col Rajeev Negi v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Feb 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:904-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the DGQA’s seniority fixation and promotion policies, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for correction of seniority and promotion to Brigadier.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant DGQA seniority permanent secondment Ajay Vikram Singh Committee Report promotion to Brigadier

Chitra Ramkrishna v. Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate

09 Feb 2023 · Jasmeet Singh · 2023:DHC:906

Delhi High Court granted bail to former NSE MD Ms. Chitra Ramkrishna, holding that prima facie no scheduled offences under PMLA or related statutes were made out against her.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA bail criminal conspiracy Section 120-B IPC

Dr Aakash Varshney v. M/s Maharashtra Feeds Pvt Ltd & Anr

09 Feb 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:1037

The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with the Trial Court's order but enhanced the cost imposed on the respondent and directed expeditious completion of the civil suit within 12 months.

civil petition_dismissed cost imposition interlocutory order procedural timelines expedited hearing

Shubhangi Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

09 Feb 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:2450

Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Arms Act for inadvertent carriage of live cartridges without conscious possession.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 25 Arms Act possession conscious possession Section 482 CrPC

Airports Authority of India v. Centre for Policy Research

09 Feb 2023 · Mini Pushkarna · 2023:DHC:956

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for damages for breach of contract relating to a 2012 recruitment process was barred by the three-year limitation period and rejected the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation breach of contract Article 55 Limitation Act Order 7 Rule 11 CPC

Rahul Karot v. The General Manager, Punjab National Bank

09 Feb 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:1067

The Delhi High Court directed the Punjab National Bank to reconsider the petitioner's compassionate appointment claim based on his newly acquired qualification by passing a reasoned order within a stipulated time.

administrative other compassionate appointment educational qualification representation reasoned order

Jitender Paliwal and Ors. v. Ajay Maurya

09 Feb 2023 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2023:DHC:969

The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded under the Employees’ Compensation Act to an electrician injured during employment, condoning delay in claim filing and affirming employer-employee relationship on evidence.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 employer-employee relationship compensation for injury condonation of delay

Ex Sgt Ashok Kumar v. Union of India and Others

09 Feb 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:968-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to furnish required documents and the respondents to pass a speaking order on the pro rata pension claim, without granting immediate relief.

administrative other pro rata pension No Objection Certificate ex-servicemen welfare Right to Information Act, 2005

Ankit Chauhan v. Rekha Devi

09 Feb 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:1084
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of leave to defend in a summary suit under Order 37 CPC where the defendant's defence was found to be frivolous and no substantial triable issue was raised.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 37 CPC leave to defend substantial defence summary suit

Pankaj Oswal v. Vikas Pahwa

09 Feb 2023 · Mini Pushkarna · 2023:DHC:958

The Delhi High Court held that statements made by advocates during judicial proceedings enjoy absolute privilege and are immune from defamation suits, dismissing the plaintiff's claim against a senior advocate for alleged defamatory remarks made in court.

civil petition_dismissed Significant absolute privilege defamation advocate judicial proceedings