Delhi High Court
61,224 judgments
Bank of Baroda v. M/S Aggarwal Agencies Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay and consequently the appeal filed by Bank of Baroda against a decree in favor of M/s Aggarwal Agencies Pvt. Ltd., holding that the delay was not satisfactorily explained despite COVID-19 related extensions.
M/S IONIC MSM LTD. v. SMT SITA DEVI TH. LR SUBODH KUMAR JAIN
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the Trial Court's order striking off the Defendant's defense for non-payment of arrears and dismissing the amendment application due to lack of specific pleadings on lease renewal.
Delhi State Legal Services Authority v. Chief Public Information Officer
The Delhi High Court upheld the CIC order directing the Juvenile Justice Board to reconstruct destroyed records and provide RTI information to the victim's father under Section 99(2) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015.
Shiv Devi v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court corrected a clerical error in its earlier order by amending the deposit amount from Rs.25,00/- to Rs.25,000/- and directed uploading the corrigendum.
UPGRAD EDUCATION PRIVATE LIMITED v. INTELLIPAAT SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil commercial suit by decreeing it in terms of the parties' settlement recorded through undertaking affidavits.
Santosh Chadha v. Sh. Hari Chand & Ors
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court’s order closing the defendant’s evidence for lack of medical proof, granting a final opportunity to record evidence considering the petitioner’s age and subsequent medical documents.
M/S MAHAJAN FABRICS PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER, CGST AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellate order rejecting CGST refund, holding that the Revenue's appeal was based on an erroneous finding regarding vehicle registration and that the petitioner complied with statutory refund eligibility conditions.
Usha Rani through her LR Vandana Oberoi v. Aarshi Arora
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of an application to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, holding that disputed ownership issues require trial and the plaint disclosed a cause of action.
Jyotsana Sinha v. Snigdha Paper and Packaging LLP
The Delhi High Court held that upon valid invocation of an arbitration clause, the Court must appoint an arbitrator without delving into the merits or pending suits, and directed appointment of a Chartered Accountant arbitrator through DIAC.
Mohd Iqbal Ali v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for possession of commercial quantity heroin, holding that Section 50 NDPS Act notice is required only when the person is searched, not when contraband is recovered from the accused's bag.
Riyasat Ali v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of theft, holding that pending forensic reports and refusal to join TIP do not justify denial of bail once the charge sheet is filed and no recovery is made.
RICA S.P.A v. M/S HIRAL CHEM & ORS.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit following a settlement recognizing the plaintiff's exclusive rights and prohibiting defendants from using deceptively similar marks.
G.M Modi Hospital A Research Centre for Medical Sciences v. Vishnu Priya Giri
The Delhi High Court upheld the joint and several liability of a hospital and doctor for medical negligence causing death, affirming compensation with interest from the complaint date and emphasizing the hospital's vicarious liability and need for systemic improvements.
Milan Saini v. Kamal Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed applications alleging forgery of SPA-holder's signatures, holding that admitted signatures by the signer and principal negate forgery, and no inquiry under Section 340 Cr.P.C. was warranted.
Ankush Kumar and Anr. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, applying the principle that criminal proceedings may be quashed when conviction is unlikely and continuation would cause prejudice to the accused.
Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd. v. Sanjay Aggarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court condoned delay and appointed an independent arbitrator for de novo arbitration after setting aside the original Arbitral Award under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Energy Efficiency Services Ltd v. MS VAP Infosolutions
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes between Energy Efficiency Services Ltd. and VAP Infosolutions arising under Letters of Award.
Anju Singh v. Punam
The Delhi High Court abated the appeal due to the appellant's death and non-appearance of legal representatives, and discharged the Bank Guarantee furnished in the case.
Arun Chauhan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial and forensic evidence under Section 302 IPC.
Niraj Pradhan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending promotion representation within four weeks after completing required formalities, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.