Delhi High Court
28,224 judgments
Telecom Watchdog v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the CBI's closure of investigation without FIR registration in a telecom tender corruption complaint, directing departmental action and compliance with procedural mandates under Lalita Kumari.
Seven Star Dot Com Pvt. Ltd. v. Zee Entertainment Enterprise Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order vacating the interim stay against signal disconnection due to the appellant's substantial non-compliance with regulatory requirements and under-declaration of subscribers.
Sudhir Sahni v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of sexual assault charges under POCSO due to inconsistencies in prosecutrix's testimony, doubtful medical evidence, and questionable forensic sample handling, holding that prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Wajid & Anr. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties in a private property dispute, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Lalit Narayan v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an internal candidate appointed to a post within the same department cannot be appointed on deputation and must be treated as direct recruitment, directing correction of the appointment letter and granting consequential benefits.
Biswaroop Roy Chowdhyury v. Delhi Medical Council
The Delhi High Court held that the Delhi Medical Council's expert opinion sought by police is not an adjudicatory order and dismissed the writ petition challenging it, emphasizing that the question of medical practice and negligence is to be decided at trial.
Forever Toy Traders Association v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020 and dismissed petitions by toy traders challenging mandatory BIS certification as frivolous personal interest litigations misusing PIL jurisdiction.
M/S INTERMOLDE INDIA v. M/S SUPREME INDUSTRIES LTD
The Delhi High Court held that the Executing Court lacks jurisdiction under Order 21 CPC to impose daily costs for delay in compliance of an undertaking and set aside such cost orders.
Chandra Prakash Goyal v. State Through Chief Secretariat & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354(A), 509, and 323 IPC on the ground of an amicable family settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of the court process.
Ajay Kumar Gupta v. Anita and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the imposition of penalty on the employer for unjustified delay in payment of compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act, dismissing the appeal and refusing to condone delay in filing.
DD Gears Employees Union v. DD Gears Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that employees must first exhaust statutory remedies under the Industrial Disputes Act and related laws before seeking writ relief for illegal closure and non-payment of dues.
MR. Anshul Bharti & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following a genuine mutual settlement and divorce decree.
Suraj @ Juganu v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal directing concurrent running of sentences under Section 427(1) CrPC for convictions arising from different FIRs, balancing legal principles with the appellant's conduct and socio-economic background.
S G Parashar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the increase in retirement age recommended by the 5th Pay Commission does not apply to NCUI employees without formal amendment of service rules, dismissing the appeal seeking extension of service beyond 58 years.
Vinay Kumar Mishra v. Central Bureau of Narcotics
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a narcotic drugs case involving Ayurvedic medicines containing medicinal opium, holding that the NDPS Act applies in addition to the Drugs & Cosmetics Act and that the bar on bail under Section 37 NDPS Act does not apply to intermediate quantity possession.
Ayush Chaudhary & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 323, 325, and 34 IPC, holding that a mere apology letter does not constitute a valid compromise and inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. must be exercised cautiously considering the gravity of the offence.
Karan Sharma v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and all criminal proceedings against the petitioner based on an amicable settlement between the parties, allowing partial quashing post chargesheet to prevent abuse of court process.
M/S. RAKESH ENTERPRISES v. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside the GST registration cancellation order for failing to consider the petitioner's response and directed restoration of registration, emphasizing the GST law's facilitative intent.
Dr. Subhash Vijayran v. Abhijit Mishra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed disciplinary inquiry against an advocate for alleged misconduct and ordered institutional inquiry into internal disputes in a medical department, while deferring the issue of bar license cancellation pending Supreme Court consideration.