Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Ayush Chaudhary & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 323, 325, and 34 IPC, holding that a mere apology letter does not constitute a valid compromise and inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. must be exercised cautiously considering the gravity of the offence.
Karan Sharma v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and all criminal proceedings against the petitioner based on an amicable settlement between the parties, allowing partial quashing post chargesheet to prevent abuse of court process.
M/S. RAKESH ENTERPRISES v. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside the GST registration cancellation order for failing to consider the petitioner's response and directed restoration of registration, emphasizing the GST law's facilitative intent.
Dr. Subhash Vijayran v. Abhijit Mishra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed disciplinary inquiry against an advocate for alleged misconduct and ordered institutional inquiry into internal disputes in a medical department, while deferring the issue of bar license cancellation pending Supreme Court consideration.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG & Anr. v. Natco Pharma Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the finding that the patent for Risdiplam is prima facie obvious over prior art genus patents, thereby justifying refusal of interlocutory injunction in the infringement suit.
Lal Vedant Nath Shah Deo v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged under the NDPS Act and IPC, holding that in absence of recovery from him and with only co-accused disclosures and financial transactions as evidence, bail should be granted on general principles.
Dharmender Gautam & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a family dispute under Sections 354, 354(B), 324, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
JK Construction Co. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of a contractor's bid for non-compliance with tender vehicle specifications, affirming limited judicial interference in tender decisions absent arbitrariness.
Novateur Electrical & Digital Systems Pvt Ltd v. V-Guard Industries Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a counter claim for cancellation of registered designs is maintainable before the civil court in a piracy suit under the Designs Act, 2000, following the Supreme Court's ruling in S.D. Containers.
Monk Estates Private Limited & Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court ordered investigation into missing land registration records, conversion of a non-cognizable report into an FIR, and reconstruction of lost records based on certified copies, emphasizing authorities' duty to safeguard land records.
Amit Kumar v. Punjab National Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal from service, directing the petitioner to exhaust the statutory appeal remedy under Punjab National Bank Regulations within an extended time.
ALPHA INFOLAB PVT LTD v. NATIONAL INTERNET EXCHANGE OF INDIA AND ANR
Delhi High Court held that termination of distributorship on vague national security grounds without prior notice violates natural justice and directed issuance of a show cause notice with opportunity to respond.
Madan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 307 IPC but reduced the sentence to the period already served, considering the long delay and appellant's circumstances.
M/S AIRPETS RELOCATION SERVICES (P) LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that pet owners alone are legally accountable for pet import/export formalities, and authorized representatives may act on their behalf as per the Office Memorandum dated 15th July, 2020, dismissing the petition challenging earlier restrictive guidelines.
Ritu Johari v. Vineet Taneja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Respondent's application to modify the order appointing child counsellors and refused to postpone the Family Court hearing, emphasizing expeditious adjudication in the long-pending guardianship matter.
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. KRISHAN LAL GUPTA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and upheld the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal's award of compensation to the deceased's family, rejecting the insurer's plea of collusion and affirming liability despite the driver being the deceased's son.
Rajat Enterprises v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a debarment order against a contractor for failure to comply with natural justice and for issuing an order beyond the scope of the show cause notice.
Anil Kumar v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking re-evaluation and rounding off of marks in the Delhi Higher Judicial Services Examination, holding that the rules expressly prohibit such relief and no material error was shown.
Anil Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner's legal notice as a representation and decide it within four weeks, ensuring timely administrative action.
Mahinder Kumar alias Mahinder Nikham & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute where the parties had amicably settled and resumed cohabitation.