Delhi High Court
63,002 judgments
Vishesh v. Commissioner of Police
Delhi High Court directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to participate in the Physical Endurance Test despite missing the initial date due to injury, ensuring fairness in the recruitment process.
ITMA HOTELS INDIA PVT LTD v. AWA LIGHTING DESIGNERS INC & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and directed reference of the dispute to arbitration, holding that the court's role under Section 8 is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement without examining merits.
Sirona Hygiene Private Limited v. Flipkart Internet Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against e-commerce sellers and platforms, allowing a compromise between Plaintiff and Flipkart and restraining defaulting sellers from using Plaintiff’s trademarks.
ESRI R&D Center India Private Limited v. Ambience Towers Private Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that both the original lessor and successor in interest must be parties to arbitration under the lease deed, confining its role to examining the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement and appointing an arbitrator accordingly.
Union of India & Ors. v. Syed Ahmed
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s direction to consider counting the respondent’s ad hoc service towards pension qualifying service, clarifying that the DoPT OM 1991 does not preclude such counting and emphasizing that Tribunals should decide claims on merits rather than remanding to the executive.
Union of India & Ors. v. Junior Warrant Officer Jai Bhagwan (Retd) Perm
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising post-entry are service-related unless rebutted by clear evidence.
PUMA SE v. ALIKA HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court granted an ex parte permanent injunction and costs to PUMA SE against Alika Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. for infringing its well-known registered trademark "PUMA" by using deceptively similar marks on pharmaceutical products.
Razia & Ors. v. Sant Singh Bal through LRs. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to complete the cross-examination of a witness, setting aside the trial court's order that prematurely closed it due to non-payment of costs and granted no further adjournments.
Amit Jain v. Mahavir International Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal permitting refund of court fees where a suit was withdrawn due to lack of jurisdiction of the Commercial Court, emphasizing liberal interpretation of court fees laws and protection of litigants from counsel's erroneous filing.
Asha Community Health and Development Society v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court refused to stay demolition of an NGO-run health centre on government land for a national infrastructure project, emphasizing that infrastructure development cannot be impeded by interim relief under Article 226.
X & Y v. Z
Delhi High Court allowed preservation of third-party hotel and phone records in a domestic violence and matrimonial dispute, clarifying the Court's power under Section 28 of the DV Act to safeguard evidence beyond strict CPC provisions.
Officer of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India v. Madhumita Mondal
The Delhi High Court held that personal and confidential information relating to service records and vigilance notes is exempt from disclosure under the RTI Act, setting aside the CIC's order directing such disclosure.
Bina Jain & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the summoning order against company directors and secretary in a cheque dishonour case, holding that prima facie allegations of their involvement warrant trial.
Lilesh Kumar Tiwari v. Indo Tibetan Border Police Force & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the ITBP to decide the petitioner's pending representation for appointment against unfilled vacancies within four weeks, ensuring administrative fairness.
National Highways Authority of India v. Consulting Engineering Group Ltd Jaipur
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in a contractual dispute, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and affirming the arbitrator's adherence to contract terms and principles of natural justice.
Sukhdev v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner’s representation during the survey under the Street Vendors Act, dismissing the writ petition without granting preemptive relief.
The Northern India Zonal Assembly of the Mar Thoma Church v. Income Tax Officer (Exemptions) & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the tax appellate authority to consider the full reassessment order and dispose of the pending appeal within three months, addressing the petitioner’s grievance of partial reliance and delay.
Upinder Kumar Wanchoo v. Income Tax Officer Ward 43 6New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider after affording a personal hearing and passing a speaking order.
Holyland Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Vijay Pal Vineet Kumar and Co. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove the deceptively similar "Golden Queen" mark from the Register, holding it infringed the earlier "Golden Crown" mark under Sections 11(1)(b) and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI v. SMT SANTOSH
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner-management a final opportunity to lead evidence despite prior closure, considering medical emergencies, subject to compensation and strict conditions to prevent further delay.