Delhi High Court

94,045 judgments

Year:

Om Prakash & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

09 May 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2023:DHC:3905-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed street vendors holding valid certificates under the 2014 Act to continue vending in designated areas subject to compliance with certificate conditions until permanent sites are allotted.

administrative petition_allowed Street Vendors Act 2014 vending certificate Municipal Corporation of Delhi writ petition

Shri Mukul Sanwal v. Union of India

09 May 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:3177-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Government's discretionary denial of pension under Rule 5(1) of the AIS (DCRB) Rules must be reasoned, and directed the petitioner to challenge the fresh denial before the Central Administrative Tribunal.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pensionary benefits All India Service (Death-Cum-Retiral Benefits) Rules, 1958 Rule 5(1) discretionary power

M/S. QUICKDEL LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. v. DELHI ARBITRATION CENTRE & ORS.

09 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3259

The Delhi High Court held that benefits under the MSMED Act cannot be claimed retrospectively by a supplier registered after contract and supply, setting aside arbitration proceedings initiated under the Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant MSMED Act 2006 registration date retrospective benefit arbitration

Brompton Lifestyle Brands Pvt. Ltd. v. Yves Saint Laurent and Anr.

09 May 2023 · Manmohan; Saurabh Banerjee · 2023:DHC:3150-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed Brompton's appeal, upholding the injunction restraining unauthorized use of YSL trademarks post-termination of the franchise agreement, emphasizing privity of contract and estoppel against contradictory judicial stands.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Franchise Agreement Trademark Infringement Trade Marks Act 1999 Interlocutory Injunction

Rajesh Kumar Panday and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.

09 May 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3313-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking Old Pension Scheme benefits for CRPF personnel, holding the issue resolved by a recent government memorandum and prior judicial decision.

administrative petition_dismissed Old Pension Scheme CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 CRPF pension benefits Office Memorandum 03.03.2023

Pradeep Kumar Sinha v. Union of India & Ors.

09 May 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:3184-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings initiated without prior approval of the competent authority are invalid and cannot be validated by post facto approval, setting aside the penalty imposed on the petitioner.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings charge sheet prior approval post facto approval

Poonam Kakkar v. Vaishali & Anr.

09 May 2023 · Gaurang Kanth · 2023:DHC:3172

The Delhi High Court set aside a decree of possession granted on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC due to disputed facts requiring trial, emphasizing that clear and unambiguous admissions are necessary for such summary judgments.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admissions landlord-tenant relationship English Mortgage

Ranjan Dhingra v. Rotary International & Ors.

09 May 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:3096

Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit challenging Rotary International's election result, holding that only Clubs have locus to challenge under the Bylaws and internal remedies must be exhausted before court intervention.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Rotary International Election challenge Locus standi Internal dispute resolution

Anil Bhai v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors.

09 May 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:3180-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the petitioner's application for lack of detailed consideration and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Procedural Central Administrative Tribunal illegal gratification sting operation video evidence

Sanjeev Kumar Bhakri v. Alembic Limited

09 May 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3188

The Delhi High Court held that a stay order cannot be varied without notice and hearing, directed the tribunal to hear the matter urgently without adjournment, and restored the original stay order.

civil petition_dismissed stay order variation of stay notice and hearing balancing equities

Shankar Lal v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors.

09 May 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:3178-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order dismissing a disciplinary challenge for failure to address substantive pleas and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Central Administrative Tribunal disciplinary proceedings judicial review procedural infirmity

Rajini Mishra v. State of NCT of Delhi

09 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3640

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and set aside the summoning order in a death due to negligence case following a bona fide settlement providing compensation and employment to the victim's family.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR summoning order settlement Section 482 CrPC

M/S AT ENTERPRISES v. M/S PICCADILY HOTELS PVT. LTD. & ORS

09 May 2023 · SURESH KUMAR KAIT; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2023:DHC:3310-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the order returning a commercial suit plaint due to procedural errors and directed the trial court to reconsider the matter after giving both parties an opportunity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order VII Rule 10 CPC return of plaint commercial suit

Pravesh Kumar Mandal v. Union of India & Anr.

09 May 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3309-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking transfer on medical grounds by treating it as a representation and directing the respondents to decide it within a stipulated time.

administrative other transfer posting Border Security Force writ petition

D.T.C. v. Karamvir Singh

09 May 2023 · Gaurang Kanth · 2023:DHC:3173
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's dismissal of the employer's approval application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, holding that failure to prove misconduct and non-production of the Inquiry Officer vitiated the domestic enquiry.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Section 33(2)(b) Industrial Disputes Act domestic enquiry natural justice misconduct

Radnik Exports v. Supertech Realtors Pvt Ltd

09 May 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:3135

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under an allotment agreement, holding that disputed questions on settlement and arbitration scope are for the arbitrator to decide, while lease rental claims fall outside the arbitration agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Agreement Section 11 Arbitration Act Appointment of Arbitrator Allotment Letter

Union of India v. Reliance Industries Limited & Ors.

09 May 2023 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2023:DHC:3137

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award permitting Reliance to produce migrated natural gas under a Production Sharing Contract, rejecting the Ministry of Petroleum's challenge on grounds of patent illegality, public policy, and non-arbitrability.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Production Sharing Contract Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Patent illegality Public policy of India

Jagdish Singh v. Udayvir Singh & Ors.

09 May 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3328

The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expedite hearing of the petitioner's interim application restraining illegal construction, emphasizing the need for early disposal to prevent irreparable harm.

civil appeal_allowed Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC interim injunction illegal construction early hearing

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Triweni Enterprises

09 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3264
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that MSME Act benefits apply only if registration exists at contract date, quashing MSEFC references where registration was subsequent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant MSME Act, 2006 Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council registration date retrospective benefit

Ultratech Cement Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

09 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3258
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that the NGT must follow natural justice by issuing notice before passing prima facie orders and appointing Amicus Curiae only after hearing all parties, directing continuation of proceedings with adherence to proper procedure.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal natural justice notice suo motu jurisdiction