Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Brompton Lifestyle Brands Pvt. Ltd. v. Yves Saint Laurent and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Brompton's appeal, upholding the injunction restraining unauthorized use of YSL trademarks post-termination of the franchise agreement, emphasizing privity of contract and estoppel against contradictory judicial stands.
Rajesh Kumar Panday and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking Old Pension Scheme benefits for CRPF personnel, holding the issue resolved by a recent government memorandum and prior judicial decision.
Pradeep Kumar Sinha v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings initiated without prior approval of the competent authority are invalid and cannot be validated by post facto approval, setting aside the penalty imposed on the petitioner.
Poonam Kakkar v. Vaishali & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a decree of possession granted on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC due to disputed facts requiring trial, emphasizing that clear and unambiguous admissions are necessary for such summary judgments.
Ranjan Dhingra v. Rotary International & Ors.
Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit challenging Rotary International's election result, holding that only Clubs have locus to challenge under the Bylaws and internal remedies must be exhausted before court intervention.
Anil Bhai v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the petitioner's application for lack of detailed consideration and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Sanjeev Kumar Bhakri v. Alembic Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a stay order cannot be varied without notice and hearing, directed the tribunal to hear the matter urgently without adjournment, and restored the original stay order.
Shankar Lal v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order dismissing a disciplinary challenge for failure to address substantive pleas and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Rajini Mishra v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and set aside the summoning order in a death due to negligence case following a bona fide settlement providing compensation and employment to the victim's family.
M/S AT ENTERPRISES v. M/S PICCADILY HOTELS PVT. LTD. & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside the order returning a commercial suit plaint due to procedural errors and directed the trial court to reconsider the matter after giving both parties an opportunity.
Pravesh Kumar Mandal v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking transfer on medical grounds by treating it as a representation and directing the respondents to decide it within a stipulated time.
D.T.C. v. Karamvir Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's dismissal of the employer's approval application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, holding that failure to prove misconduct and non-production of the Inquiry Officer vitiated the domestic enquiry.
Radnik Exports v. Supertech Realtors Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under an allotment agreement, holding that disputed questions on settlement and arbitration scope are for the arbitrator to decide, while lease rental claims fall outside the arbitration agreement.
Union of India v. Reliance Industries Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award permitting Reliance to produce migrated natural gas under a Production Sharing Contract, rejecting the Ministry of Petroleum's challenge on grounds of patent illegality, public policy, and non-arbitrability.
Jagdish Singh v. Udayvir Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expedite hearing of the petitioner's interim application restraining illegal construction, emphasizing the need for early disposal to prevent irreparable harm.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Triweni Enterprises
The Delhi High Court held that MSME Act benefits apply only if registration exists at contract date, quashing MSEFC references where registration was subsequent.
Ultratech Cement Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the NGT must follow natural justice by issuing notice before passing prima facie orders and appointing Amicus Curiae only after hearing all parties, directing continuation of proceedings with adherence to proper procedure.
Union of India v. Sh. Om Prakash
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition for failing to demonstrate any apparent error on the face of the order, emphasizing that merits cannot be re-examined in review proceedings.
Uma Kant Sadhav and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Whole Time Members appointed under statutory provisions cannot have their salaries reduced by pension deductions based on DoPT instructions, affirming that their appointments were fresh and protected by statute against detrimental variation.
Ravinder Kumar Yadav v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order dismissing a disciplinary challenge for lack of reasoned findings and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.