Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd v. Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that MSME registration obtained after contract completion does not confer retrospective benefits under the MSMED Act, setting aside the arbitration reference by the Facilitation Council.
Sanjay Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, directing the Adjudicating Authority to independently consider all valuation and related issues afresh at the final hearing under the PMLA.
Himmat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to decide the petitioners' representation for MACP benefits and arrears in accordance with a prior judgment within eight weeks, dismissing the writ petition.
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd v. MS Parasvnath Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a suit alleging latent defects discovered after a conciliation settlement is maintainable and not barred by limitation, dismissing the defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Rakesh and Ors. v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
S.S. CON-BUILD PVT LTD v. Delhi Development Authority
Disputes relating to lease termination and arrears under the Public Premises Act are non-arbitrable and fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Estate Officer, barring arbitration or civil court proceedings.
Rajesh Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes based on a genuine settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the court's power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent futile litigation.
Sheevam Transolutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 22(2) Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order for failure to grant personal hearing, directing a fresh hearing in compliance with natural justice and CBDT guidelines.
Ramit Chhabra & Ors. v. The State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Ravi Prakash v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representations on MACP benefits and recovery of increments within four weeks, restraining further recovery meanwhile.
Employees State Insurance Corporation & Anr. v. Ajay Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order allowing LTC claims by employees who booked tickets through unauthorized agents, subject to recovery of any excess fare over authorized agent rates.
Sumer Sharma & Anr. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a family dispute under Sections 354, 506, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and the complainant's unwillingness to proceed, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Janak Raj v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a government servant convicted by a trial court is not entitled to provisional pension during the pendency of appeal if the conviction itself is not stayed, validating permanent pension forfeiture under CCS Pension Rules.
Unikil Pesticides Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a 'me-too' insecticide registration application under Section 9(4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968, holding that such registration requires import from the same source as the original registration under Section 9(3).
Sh. Genda Ram v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following a voluntary and lawful settlement between parties in a private dispute.
Himanshu Verma v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Ajit Saxena v. Roshni Rajaram
The Delhi High Court set aside costs imposed on counsel due to miscommunication during a virtual hearing and expunged adverse remarks against the counsel, disposing of the petition accordingly.
Om Prakash & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed street vendors holding valid certificates under the 2014 Act to continue vending in designated areas subject to compliance with certificate conditions until permanent sites are allotted.
Shri Mukul Sanwal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Government's discretionary denial of pension under Rule 5(1) of the AIS (DCRB) Rules must be reasoned, and directed the petitioner to challenge the fresh denial before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
M/S. QUICKDEL LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. v. DELHI ARBITRATION CENTRE & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that benefits under the MSMED Act cannot be claimed retrospectively by a supplier registered after contract and supply, setting aside arbitration proceedings initiated under the Act.