Full Text
#S-30 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
Parte Stay)
OM PRAKASH & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioners : Mr. Awijit Paliwal, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Mr. Arindam Dey and Mr. Saubhagya S., Advocates for R-1/MCD.
Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocate for R-3.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
CM APPL. 23519/2023 (Exemption)
1. Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of accordingly. Signing Date:02.06.2023 16:47
1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks leave to delete Central Public Works Department/respondent no. 2 from the array of parties on the ground that no relief is prayed for in the present writ petition against the said respondent.
2. Leave and liberty granted.
3. Let amended memo of parties be filed.
4. The present petition has been instituted on behalf of the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying as follows: “A) Issue an appropriate Writ of Mandamus, Order or direction to the Respondents No.l-3 not to disturb/dislocate the petitioners from vending in the area Opposite Mechanic Market, Near Hanuman Mandir, Sewa Nagar, Delhi - 110003 till the allotment of permanent vending site to the Petitioners. B) Pass any such order/further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.”
5. Issue notice.
6. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent no. 1/Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and Ms. Urvi Mohan, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.3.
7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the MCD, has handed-up in the Court today, the terms and conditions, permitting the petitioners to vend.
8. Let the same be taken on the record. For the sake of completeness, the said terms and conditions attached to the Certificate of Vending are reproduced herein below:-
9. It is an admitted position that the Town Vending Committee (TVC), has in terms of the directions issued by this Court, from time to time, as well as, in terms of the mandate of Section 3 (Survey of street vendors and protection from eviction on relocation) and Section 4 (Issue of certificate of vending) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, carried out a survey, in some of the areas under the MCD zones; pursuant to which, the following petitioners have been issued certificates of vending, which are annexed as Annexure A-1, to the present writ petition.
NAME OF THE STREET VENDORS DATE OF ISSUE OF VENDING PLACE OF VENDING VENDING CERTIFICATE (URI)
CATEGORY OF THE COV CERTIFICATE
3 Ms. Meena 06.11.2021 Central S-58 1463401 Others 4 Ms. Bajrangi Davi S-58 6774522 Others 5 Mr. Guddu Verma S-58 8955649 Others
10. In view of the foregoing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, seeks a solitary relief in the present writ petition, i.e. a direction to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, to permit the petitioners to continue to vend within Central Zone, Ward-S-58, strictly and scrupulously in compliance with the terms and conditions of the said certificates of vending and in accordance with law.
11. In view of the above, the present writ petition is allowed; and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is directed to permit the petitioners to vend within Central Zone, Ward-S-58, subject to the terms and conditions of the said certificates of vending dated 06.11.2021, without any let or hindrance.
12. Needless to state that the petitioners falling within the category of ‘Others’ will be at liberty to articulate any difficulties faced by them, before the appropriate authorities, insofar as it employs the expression ‘Others’.
13. No further directions are prayed for.
14. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
15. A copy of this judgment be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (JUDGE) TALWANT SINGH, J (JUDGE) MAY 09, 2023 Click here to check corrigendum, if any