Delhi High Court
63,002 judgments
Mahesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Delhi High Court granted bail to a teenage accused in a POCSO and IPC case involving a disputed age prosecutrix, emphasizing judicial sensitivity in adolescent consensual relationships.
Puneet Verma & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following a genuine and voluntary settlement and mutual divorce between the parties.
AB SCIEX PTE LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE INT. TAX 1-1-1, DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the revenue authorities to comply with the Tribunal’s order and grant the petitioner’s income tax refunds with statutory interest for AY 2018-19 and 2019-20 by passing appeal effect orders.
Victorious H Grand v. PR Commissioner of Income Tax 20 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authority to dispose of the pending revision application under Section 264 within eight weeks and restrained coercive action against the petitioner until disposal.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3 v. Sheraton International LLC
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal challenging the taxability of fees for centralized services under the Indo-US DTAA, relying on a coordinate bench's prior ruling and condoning delay in re-filing.
Rakesh Bhatia v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354A IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
AB SCIEX PTE LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE INT. TAX 1-1-1, DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Department to comply with the Tribunal’s order and credit the refund along with statutory interest to the petitioner for AY 2017-18.
Yamini Manohar v. T K D Keerthi
The Delhi High Court held that a commercial suit seeking urgent interim relief as per pleadings is exempt from mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the plaint's maintainability.
Naimuddin v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges under Sections 354, 354B, and 376 IPC, ruling that improvements in the prosecutrix's statement and cross FIR allegations cannot be grounds for discharge at the charge framing stage.
Oneempower Pte Ltd. v. The Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court dismissed the patent appeal, holding that a transaction reward system is a non-patentable business method under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, despite involving technical elements.
Shahana & Anr. v. Mohd. Aslam
The Delhi High Court set aside a maintenance order for lack of reasons and remanded the case for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need for judicial exercise of jurisdiction and reasoned decisions in maintenance matters.
Dhara Singh v. Union Bank of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld compulsory retirement of a bank clerk for retaining customer money without accounting for it, emphasizing strict integrity standards for bank employees and limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary matters.
Virander Kumar Sharma Punj v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking mandatory introduction of legal studies in schools, holding that curriculum decisions lie exclusively with expert educational authorities and courts must exercise judicial restraint in academic matters.
ALEX TOUR AND TRAVEL PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST, DIVISION-JANAKPURI
The Delhi High Court directed the Revenue to implement appellate orders granting refund of Input Tax Credit on export of services with interest, holding consolidated FIRCs suffice and refusal to comply pending further appeal is impermissible.
Mukesh A Chaudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that no fresh disciplinary proceedings can be initiated against personnel who have already served punishment for appearing in LDCE beyond permissible attempts, setting aside orders of premature repatriation and further inquiry.
Sh. Charan Singh (Since Deceased Through LRs) and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that proceedings under the Delhi Land Reforms Act are not maintainable after urbanisation of land, dismissing the writ petition but granting liberty to approach Civil Court with exclusion of limitation period.
Seema Sahni v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that a successful auction bidder aggrieved by cancellation of auction sale has a remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act and writ jurisdiction should not be exercised absent exceptional circumstances.
Desh Pal @ Desh Raj v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for the murder of his wife based on credible circumstantial evidence and reliable child witness testimony.
Kiran Jyot Maini v. Anish Pramod Patel
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to pay 10% of maintenance arrears as interim relief where no stay exists, emphasizing enforcement of interim maintenance orders under the PWDV Act pending final adjudication.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central-1 v. SMC Power Generation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal against the Tribunal's order setting aside the assessment addition under Section 68, condoning delay but finding no substantial question of law.