Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

National Highways Authority of India v. Consulting Engineering Group Ltd Jaipur

08 May 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:3106

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in a contractual dispute, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and affirming the arbitrator's adherence to contract terms and principles of natural justice.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge patent illegality arbitral award

Sukhdev v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

08 May 2023 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2023:DHC:3212-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider the petitioner’s representation during the survey under the Street Vendors Act, dismissing the writ petition without granting preemptive relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Street Vendors Act 2014 Town Vending Committee vending certificate Article 226 Constitution of India

The Northern India Zonal Assembly of the Mar Thoma Church v. Income Tax Officer (Exemptions) & Anr

08 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:3605-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the tax appellate authority to consider the full reassessment order and dispose of the pending appeal within three months, addressing the petitioner’s grievance of partial reliance and delay.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Assessment order Reassessment order Restricted sub-grant

Upinder Kumar Wanchoo v. Income Tax Officer Ward 43 6New Delhi & Anr.

08 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:3603-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider after affording a personal hearing and passing a speaking order.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Section 271(1)(b)

Holyland Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Vijay Pal Vineet Kumar and Co. and Ors.

08 May 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:3139

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove the deceptively similar "Golden Queen" mark from the Register, holding it infringed the earlier "Golden Crown" mark under Sections 11(1)(b) and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 57 Section 11(1)(b) deceptive similarity

versus

08 May 2023 · TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL); [ The proceeding has been cond... · 2023:DHC:3205

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner-management a final opportunity to lead evidence despite prior closure, considering medical emergencies, subject to compensation and strict conditions to prevent further delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant right to lead evidence closure of evidence adjournment medical emergency

The Northern India Zonal Assembly of the Mar Thoma Church v. Income Tax Officer (Exemptions) & Anr

08 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:3607-DB

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of a pending income tax appeal and mandated consideration of the entire reassessment order concerning a related entity to ensure just adjudication of exemption claims under the Income Tax Act.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 11 exemption Section 12 exemption Section 13(1)(b)

Sony Group Corporation v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs

08 May 2023 · Amit Bansal · 2023:DHC:3350

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and held that amendments limiting patent claims to disclosures already made in the specification are permissible under Section 59(1) of the Patents Act, even if they correspond to claims of a divisional application.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant patent amendment Section 59(1) Patents Act disclaimer in patent claims divisional patent application

JBB Everest Buildtech Private Limited v. Naresh Chawla

08 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3174
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a consumer commission order, holding that claims of flat buyers post insolvency must be adjudicated by the appropriate consumer forum in accordance with the approved resolution plan, and writ jurisdiction should be sparingly exercised when efficacious alternative remedies exist.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Article 226 Insolvency resolution plan Jurisdiction

SH SAGAR ARORA AND ORS v. THE STATE AND ANR

08 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3729

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Faisal v. State - Govt. of NCT of Delhi

08 May 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:3225

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a petitioner involved in multiple serious offences, emphasizing the need for judicial discretion considering the nature of charges and conduct in custody.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail regular bail habitual offender prima facie involvement

Sabuddin @ Sabu v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi

08 May 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:3152

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused in a sexual assault case involving a minor, holding that the gravity of the offence and corroborative evidence outweigh a compromise deed and no objection by the victim's mother.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail sexual assault minor victim Section 377 IPC

Union of India v. M/S Pragati Construction Consultants

08 May 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:3411

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award as barred by the mandatory limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act, 1996, without condoning the inordinate delay.

civil petition_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34(3) limitation condonation of delay

Dr. Upender Krishen Wali v. Government of J & K and Anr.

08 May 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:3500

Delhi High Court holds it has jurisdiction over Jammu & Kashmir migrant doctors and directs grant of full monetary benefits from actual dates of time-bound promotions, ensuring parity and rejecting arbitrary deferral.

service appeal_allowed Significant time-bound promotion monetary benefits territorial jurisdiction Article 226

Sunder v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

08 May 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3206

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition of the petitioner's property pending appeal and directed the appellate court to decide the interim application within a specified timeframe.

administrative petition_allowed Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Section 347-C(3) Section 347-D interim relief

Sh. Anil Kumar Kuchhal & Anr. v. Sh. Pradyuman Kumar Aggarwal & Anr.

08 May 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:3244

The Delhi High Court remanded the appeal for rehearing to consider the petitioner's complaint against counsel's negligence and the admissibility of related documents in an application for condonation of delay in filing the written statement.

civil other Significant condonation of delay written statement negligence of counsel Order VIII Rule 1 CPC

Chairman, Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ramji Lal

08 May 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:3412-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing refund of illegally recovered excess salary and gratuity amounts from a retired employee, applying the Supreme Court's principles limiting recovery after five years and from terminal benefits.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant recovery of excess salary pay fixation terminal benefits gratuity recovery

Yogesh v. State

08 May 2023 · Mukta Gupta; Poonam A. Bamba · 2023:DHC:3119-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murdering his father based on circumstantial evidence and failure to explain the cause of death under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC Section 106 Indian Evidence Act

Amit Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 34-1 New Delhi and Anr.

08 May 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:4242-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the assessment order for AY 2019-20 due to denial of personal hearing and procedural lapses, directing a fresh hearing and assessment in compliance with natural justice under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 148A(b) Income Tax Act personal hearing bogus sales principles of natural justice

Malkiat Singh v. Union of India

08 May 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:3255

The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider the petitioner's severe medical condition under Section 29 of the Extradition Act, 1962 before deciding on the extradition request, without adjudicating the merits.

criminal other Significant extradition Section 29 Extradition Act 1962 fugitive criminal medical condition