Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Concept Eateries Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9947-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

Izhaar Ul Islam v. Commissioner of Customs IGI Airport T3 New Delhi

11 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9968-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court ordered unconditional release of a detained gold bracelet worn by the petitioner, holding that non-issuance of a show cause notice within the statutory period mandates release of personal effects without customs duty.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 show cause notice personal effects gold jewellery

M/S Samarth Traders and Anr v. Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax Old Delhi

11 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9942-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal against confirmed GST demand and penalty for wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit, holding that personal hearing opportunities were provided and emphasizing adherence to appellate procedures.

tax other Input Tax Credit CGST Act, 2017 Penalty Personal Hearing

Bhupesh Arora v. Directorate of Enforcement

11 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9931

Interim bail was denied to the accused in a large-scale money laundering case as the medical emergency cited was not imminent and the petitioner posed a flight risk with serious charges pending.

criminal petition_dismissed Interim Bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act Medical Grounds Flight Risk

Classic International Prop. Manoj Kumar (HUF) v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Services Tax & Ors.

11 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9937-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to defective notice on the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of hearing, leaving the validity of impugned notifications to be decided by the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

Sarvatra International v. The Principal Commissioner of Customs

11 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9944-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant a final opportunity to file written submissions and argue the appeal on merits before CESTAT, confirming SIIB officers as proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 28 Show Cause Notice Proper Officer

Girendra Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors

11 Nov 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:10033-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against acquittal in a dowry harassment and suicide case, affirming limited appellate interference and upholding the trial court's finding of no cruelty or foul play.

criminal appeal_dismissed acquittal dowry harassment cruelty suicide

Suresh v. State (NCT of Delhi)

11 Nov 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9956
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused in a murder case, holding that serious offences require cautious bail consideration despite prolonged pre-trial detention.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail murder Section 302 IPC prolonged pre-trial detention

Rabindra Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9969-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to finalize the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner within six months, ensuring compliance with legal requirements, while reserving the petitioner’s right to challenge the final order.

administrative petition_allowed disciplinary proceedings writ petition reasonable time administrative law

Deepak v. The Director General, CISF

11 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9934-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing respondents to reimburse the petitioner’s medical expenses at CGHS rates and pay costs as per the Standing Committee’s decision.

administrative petition_allowed medical expenses reimbursement CGHS rates Standing Committee decision writ petition

Raj Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Others

11 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9935-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of the case accordingly.

other other writ petition withdrawal disposal High Court of Delhi

Sunil Raj v. State

11 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10000

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 25 Arms Act based on recovery of weapons at his instance but acquitted him of IPC charges due to hostile witnesses, and modified his sentence to the period already served.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 25 Arms Act possession of prohibited weapons hostile witnesses recovery of weapons

SI Vikas Kasana PS Paharganj, Delhi v. Name Singh @ Mohit Kumar

11 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10001

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal, holding that the prosecution failed to prove the respondent's employment and entrustment beyond reasonable doubt, and emphasizing the double presumption of innocence in appeals against acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal double presumption of innocence entrustment misappropriation

Amarti Devi v. Sh Pramod Kumar & Ors

11 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:9984
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing functional disability assessment, recalculating loss of earnings based on skilled worker wages, and awarding loss of amenities alongside pain and suffering.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability functional disability loss of earnings

Parshva Innovation v. Arcis Clean Energy Pvt Ltd

11 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:9975
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the seat of arbitration governs jurisdiction despite venue ambiguities in the arbitration clause.

arbitration petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Sole Arbitrator appointment Seat of arbitration

Union of India v. Ganga Ram

11 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9868-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order prohibiting recovery of penalties not implemented during service from retiral benefits and held that penalties affecting pension require proper inquiry under railway disciplinary rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant recovery from retiral benefits withholding increment penalty disciplinary inquiry Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Master Mustafa & Ors.

11 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:9954

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal against a motor accident compensation award to a permanently disabled minor, affirming the application of notional income and future prospects in calculating loss of earning capacity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim minor claimant loss of earning capacity permanent disability

Union of India v. Sh Aziz Mohd Khan Abbasi

11 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9923-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that promotion through LDCE counts for MACP benefits but recovery of excess payments made over five years, initiated shortly before retirement, is impermissible and must be refunded with interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme MACP Limited Departmental Competitive Examination promotion

Union of India & Ors. v. Badruddin Khan

11 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service-related disability absent employer's rebuttal.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension primary hypertension armed forces tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Ram Karan v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

11 Nov 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:9966-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a woman who is a major and voluntarily staying with her parents, denying any marriage or detention.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus Article 226 adult autonomy illegal detention