Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Pankaj Kumari v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of maternity leave restrictions under Rule 43(1) of the Central Civil Services Leave Rules in light of the Supreme Court’s K. Umadevi judgment, ensuring no adverse action pending decision.
M/S SANGHVI WRITING POINTS PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Employees Provident Fund Tribunal's order due to inordinate delay and held that negligence of counsel does not justify condonation of delay in filing the petition.
Baptist Church Trust Association & Ors. v. Vineet Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal to pass a decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC where locus standi and ownership of the suit property were disputed, holding that no decree can be granted without trial in such circumstances.
M Kuttimani v. Union of India & Ors.
The petitioner withdrew the writ petition before the Delhi High Court, which was disposed of accordingly.
Sonu Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to decide the petitioner's pending appeal within six weeks, disposing of the writ petition seeking such direction.
Union of India and Ors. v. Col Surender Mohan Retd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.
Union of India and Ors. v. HFO Gajendra Nath Tiwari Retd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption of service connection and the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction.
Union of India & Ors. v. 649274 Ex HFO Satish Chandra Mishra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman diagnosed with diabetes and hypertension during service, affirming the presumption of sound health at entry and the limited scope of certiorari review.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Ex Hav Ramjas
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for coronary artery disease, affirming the presumption of service-attributability and limiting its review to errors of law apparent on record.
Sushil Singh & Anr. v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to treat it as a representation and decide it within six weeks.
Sh Surya Prakash Gupta v. N.S. Chahal
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application to recall an ex-parte decree, holding that negligence of counsel does not constitute sufficient cause and delay must be satisfactorily explained for condonation.
Baby Yaana v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that admission under the Right to Education cannot be denied on mere suspicion of address mismatch and that the 25% EWS quota is a minimum threshold without a maximum cap, directing confirmation of the petitioner's admission.
Smt. Minni v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of a criminal complaint alleging offences including outraging modesty, holding that no cognizable offence was made out and the complaint was motivated by a property dispute.
Tushar Kanti Ghosh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, holding that mere recovery of live ammunition without the petitioner's knowledge or intent does not constitute an offence.
Imran Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The High Court partly allowed the appeal by acquitting the appellant of robbery charges due to flawed identification but upheld conviction for possession of stolen property based on recovery evidence.
Lalita Goyal & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
Suraj Prakash Raheja v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Rajveer v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of Indian Coast Guard personnel for smuggling liquor, holding that procedural safeguards were complied with and Article 311 protections do not apply to them.
M/S. Paramount Bearing and Industrial Products v. AB SKF
The Delhi High Court set aside interlocutory orders freezing appellants' bank accounts for lack of reasoning and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
The State (GNCT of Delhi) v. Shubham Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court condoned delay and granted leave to appeal against the acquittal of accused in the murder of a minor girl, emphasizing a pragmatic approach balancing technicalities and merits in serious criminal cases.