Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Mr. Supreet Singh & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ravinder Singh Rawat & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes involving non-compoundable offences on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Karan Jain & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 on the ground of amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's unwillingness to proceed, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS.
M/S Numero Uno Clothing Limited v. United India Insurance Company Limited
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration clauses in insurance policies issued after the IRDAI's denotification circular remain binding, allowing appointment of arbitrators under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.
Tahir Khan v. The State (Govt NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape under Section 376 (2)(n) IPC, holding that the prosecution failed to prove that the promise of marriage was a sham from the outset to vitiate consent.
Apekshita Kala & Anr. v. District Medical Board & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed virtual participation before the District Medical Board for issuance of a Certificate of Medical Indication under the Surrogacy Act, setting aside a rejection order for absentia and emphasizing procedural fairness.
Jitender v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery under Sections 392/34 IPC but modified the sentence to the period already served, considering mitigating factors and legal precedents on sentence remission.
M/S PERFECT INDUSTRIES v. GOODS AND SERVICE TAX OFFICER, WARD - 63, DGST AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST adjudication orders passed without proper notice due to portal visibility issues, remanding for fresh hearing while leaving validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
M S Critique Communication Pvt Ltd v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 2 Zone 2 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to failure to properly communicate notices on the GST portal, remanding the matter for fresh hearing while leaving the validity of related notifications open pending Supreme Court review.
M/S Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Ajit Singh Sethi & Jasjeet Kaur Sethi
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or validity.
Devi Industrial Engineers & Ors. v. Commissioner of CGST & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed duplicate GST demand notices for financial years not corresponding to the petitioner's transaction, upholding only the relevant year's demand and allowing the petitioner to seek further remedies.
Surender Singh Chahal v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato, Ward 61 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order passed without hearing the petitioner, remanding the matter for fresh consideration while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Lakhvir Singh Sohlanki v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that continued detention of seized goods without issuance of a show cause notice within the statutory period under the Customs Act, 1962 is unlawful and directed release of the detained gold chain to the petitioner.
Avazbek Musaev v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that detention of goods without issuance of a mandatory show cause notice under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 is impermissible and ordered release of the detained gold bar to the petitioner.
M S Aggarwal Polymers India & Anr. v. M S Sri Ram Plastochem Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed a commercial appeal due to an inordinate delay of 780 days, holding that alleged fraud must be distinctly proved and negligence of counsel is not sufficient ground to condone delay.
Satminlal Haokip & Ors. v. Shri S Gopalakrishnan IAS
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition against the respondent for alleged non-compliance with a court order on height criteria in police recruitment, holding that no wilful disobedience occurred as the selection rounds had been exhausted prior to the petitioners' writ.
Abhay Kumar v. Divisional Railway Manager & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a direct recruit through open competitive examination is entitled to pay protection including arrears, setting aside the Tribunal's order restricting relief prospectively.
Pardeep Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The High Court held that charges for abetment and conspiracy can be framed without framing a substantive murder charge when no murder occurred, and remitted the case for fresh charge framing accordingly.
Dr Shrawan Kumar v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner’s grievance was redressed.
Siddharth Bajaj v. Sub R Ponnmbalam
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law.