Delhi High Court

63,783 judgments

Year:

Ashish Bhalla v. State

15 Sep 2023 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2023:DHC:6808
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an FIR under IPC is maintainable despite ongoing SFIO investigation under the Companies Act, 2013, and refused to quash the FIR on grounds of parallel proceedings or abuse of process.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 212 Companies Act, 2013 SFIO investigation quashing of FIR parallel investigation

Aude Priya Donatelle Wacziarg Ep Engel & Ors. v. Pan Macmillan Publishing India Private Limited & Ors.

15 Sep 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:6738

The Delhi High Court disposed of a suit concerning defamation and copyright infringement over a book publication by recording the parties' settlement and agreed deletions, granting permanent injunctions accordingly.

civil settled Procedural permanent injunction defamation copyright infringement breach of privacy

Burger King Corporation v. Swapnil Patil & Ors.

15 Sep 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:6732

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions and directed blocking of fraudulent domain names and freezing of bank accounts to protect Burger King's trademark from unauthorized and deceptive use in fake franchise schemes.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction trademark infringement domain name blocking fraudulent franchise

LT COL RAMANDEEP SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

15 Sep 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:6774-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to join posting at Ferozpur without prejudice to his rights to seek compassionate posting or premature retirement, mandating expeditious consideration of such applications despite an embargo period.

administrative petition_allowed posting on compassionate ground medical illness premature retirement embargo period

Prem Babu v. Union of India & Ors.

15 Sep 2023 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2023:DHC:6706

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking alternate allotment of a demolished tenement due to delay, non-compliance with payment conditions, and unresolved factual disputes not suitable for writ adjudication.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition mandamus Delhi Development Authority alternate allotment

TIA MAJUMDAR v. STATE & ORS.

15 Sep 2023 · Rekha Palli · 2023:DHC:6688

The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly proved Will while declaring bequests to attesting witnesses void under Section 67 of the Indian Succession Act.

family petition_allowed Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 67 Section 68 Section 276

Behl, Deveshi Madan and Gunjan Soni v. Amar Singh Bhalla

15 Sep 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:6741
Cites 4 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court held the respondent guilty of civil contempt for wilfully disobeying court orders and breaching undertakings to pay compensation, sentencing him to six months imprisonment.

civil conviction_upheld Significant civil contempt wilful disobedience undertaking to court Employee's Compensation Act, 1923

BAYER CORPORATION & ANR v. CIPLA LTD

15 Sep 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:6843

The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a lawful Settlement Agreement between Bayer Corporation and Cipla Ltd, allowing withdrawal of the suit and counterclaim.

civil appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Decree in terms of settlement Withdrawal of suit Withdrawal of counterclaim

Asha Gupta & Anr. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

15 Sep 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Sanjeev Narula · 2023:DHC:6674-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of MPD 2021 provisions permitting zero rear setback for plots up to 250 sq. meters and dismissed the petition challenging sanctioned construction on grounds of violation of fundamental rights and building laws.

property petition_dismissed Significant Master Plan for Delhi 2021 rear setback building sanction Articles 14 and 21

Manoj Dwivedi v. State Through Govt. of NCT of Delhi

15 Sep 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:7402

The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings under Section 174A IPC against the petitioner, holding that offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC do not warrant declaration as Proclaimed Offender under Section 82 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Proclaimed Offender Section 82 Cr.P.C. Section 174A IPC compoundable offence

Bureau of Indian Standard Laboratory Employees Association v. Union of India

15 Sep 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:7368

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to notify proposed amendments to BIS recruitment regulations, holding that executive discretion in framing rules is not subject to judicial interference absent violation of fundamental or statutory rights.

administrative petition_dismissed writ of mandamus BIS Regulations recruitment rules administrative delay

MS Nisha @ Nisaba Godrej & Ors. v. Mr Chaitanya Kumar Rampal

15 Sep 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh, J · 2023:DHC:7060

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order dismissing the petitioners' application to reject the plaint, holding that a suit against legal heirs discloses a cause of action and the court has territorial jurisdiction, with revisional interference unwarranted.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 115 CPC cause of action legal heirs liability

M VIJAY KUMARAN v. AJEET PRASAD AGGARWAL & ORS.

15 Sep 2023 · CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J · 2023:DHC:6980

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action based on alleged illegal construction affecting the respondent's peaceful enjoyment of property, and refused to interfere in revisional jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action rejection of plaint injunction

Jitender Aggarwal v. Uday Sharma and Anr.

15 Sep 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:6761
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed appeal challenging a motor accident compensation award, upholding owner liability and the quantum of compensation despite limited documentary proof.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim owner liability compensation delay condonation

Pradeep v. State (NCT of Delhi)

15 Sep 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:6700
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing the appeal and granted suspension of sentence to the appellant convicted under POCSO and IPC, considering contradictions in evidence and other factors.

criminal appeal_allowed POCSO Act Section 10 POCSO Section 354 IPC contradictions in testimony

Bharat Chugh v. Raj Kumar

15 Sep 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:6847
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order directing the defendant to deposit Rs. 12,00,000 as a condition for leave to defend a summary suit, rejecting the unsubstantiated defence of investment losses.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit cheque bounce

Mahesh Prasad & Ors. v. National Ins Co Ltd & Anr

15 Sep 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:6740
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the contributory negligence from 25% to 10% and granted loss of consortium to the claimants, enhancing the compensation awarded in a fatal motor accident claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contributory negligence motor accident claim loss of consortium compensation

Vineet Gandhi v. Shikha Gandhi

15 Sep 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:6794-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the father's appeal directing court-supervised visitation with the child to restore their relationship, emphasizing the child's welfare over mere preference.

family appeal_allowed Significant Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 visitation rights child custody Section 151 CPC

Harish Kumar Gautam v. University of Delhi

15 Sep 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Sanjeev Narula · 2023:DHC:6829-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi’s discretionary one-time relaxation of age limits for student elections during the COVID-19 pandemic, dismissing the PIL challenging it for lack of merit and public interest.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant age relaxation student elections Delhi University Lyngdoh Committee

Aslam Sayyed v. State (NCT of Delhi)

15 Sep 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:6943
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to a director implicated in a multi-crore investment fraud case, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation amid serious financial irregularities.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. financial irregularities MLM fraud