Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
MS Nisha @ Nisaba Godrej & Ors. v. Mr Chaitanya Kumar Rampal
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order dismissing the petitioners' application to reject the plaint, holding that a suit against legal heirs discloses a cause of action and the court has territorial jurisdiction, with revisional interference unwarranted.
M VIJAY KUMARAN v. AJEET PRASAD AGGARWAL & ORS.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action based on alleged illegal construction affecting the respondent's peaceful enjoyment of property, and refused to interfere in revisional jurisdiction.
Jitender Aggarwal v. Uday Sharma and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed appeal challenging a motor accident compensation award, upholding owner liability and the quantum of compensation despite limited documentary proof.
Pradeep v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing the appeal and granted suspension of sentence to the appellant convicted under POCSO and IPC, considering contradictions in evidence and other factors.
Bharat Chugh v. Raj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order directing the defendant to deposit Rs. 12,00,000 as a condition for leave to defend a summary suit, rejecting the unsubstantiated defence of investment losses.
Mahesh Prasad & Ors. v. National Ins Co Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court modified the contributory negligence from 25% to 10% and granted loss of consortium to the claimants, enhancing the compensation awarded in a fatal motor accident claim.
Vineet Gandhi v. Shikha Gandhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the father's appeal directing court-supervised visitation with the child to restore their relationship, emphasizing the child's welfare over mere preference.
Harish Kumar Gautam v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi’s discretionary one-time relaxation of age limits for student elections during the COVID-19 pandemic, dismissing the PIL challenging it for lack of merit and public interest.
Aslam Sayyed v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to a director implicated in a multi-crore investment fraud case, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation amid serious financial irregularities.
Dr. Amit Kumar v. Bharati College
The Delhi High Court clarified that claims for increments based on Ph.D. and M.Phil qualifications are beyond the scope of the writ petition and must be pursued through appropriate remedies, directing the matter for further consideration by the Roster Bench.
Ojas Satyawali v. Directorate of Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Directorate of Education's authority to grant admission under the EWS category and directed the respondent school to admit the petitioner, emphasizing the primacy of the child's right to education under the RTE Act.
Raiganj Educare Teachers Training College v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions filed by teacher training colleges by applying earlier judicial directions mutatis mutandis, pending the outcome of a related appellate proceeding.
Aditya PTC College v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by applying earlier orders passed in connected cases mutatis mutandis, subject to the outcome of a pending appeal.
PNB Housing Finance Limited v. M/S. K. K. Banijya Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted and made absolute a pre-arbitral interim order restraining respondents from alienating their shareholding, conditional on the petitioner initiating arbitration proceedings within 10 days.
C.S. Clarke v. Managing Committee of the Frank Anthony Public School
The Delhi High Court held that Rules 118 and 120 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, do not apply to unaided minority schools, and thus the appellant's dismissal without inclusion of a nominee of the appropriate authority or prior DoE approval was valid.
Sudesh Chhikara & Anr. v. Anita Dahiya & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to amend their plaint to include newly impleaded defendants under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, disposing of the petition accordingly.
Sh. Pappu Kumar Thakur v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a case involving serious allegations of sexual exploitation of a minor under the POCSO Act and IPC, holding that no ground for bail was made out despite delay in FIR registration and disputed facts.
Abhinandan Kumar Jain v. MVL Limited
The Delhi High Court directed possession and title transfer of completed flats in MVL Ltd. upon payment into escrow accounts under Official Liquidator supervision, upheld SEBI refund directions, and ordered equitable resolution of allottees' claims in the company's winding up.
Sudarshan Kumari v. Suman Jain
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a rejoinder after closure of the right to do so, subject to conditions, balancing procedural finality with fairness.
Anil Bhalla v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.; Jason Ashok Kothari v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and deleted the names of respondents from criminal proceedings after parties amicably settled a civil dispute over non-delivery of residential units.