Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Rusan Pharma Limited v. Central Medical Services Society
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of a pharmaceutical tender bid due to expired certificates, holding that valid documents must exist on the tender opening date and post-opening documents cannot be considered.
M/S POONAWALLA FINCORP LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court quashed a mechanically issued show cause notice demanding blocked Input Tax Credit for failure to disclose reasons, affirming that such notices must be based on a prima facie belief of wrongful availment under the CGST Act.
NO.2 TILAK MARG G.H.FLAT BUYERS ASSOCIATION v. M/S RAVINDRA PROPERTIES P. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit filed by an unregistered flat buyers association for specific performance and declaration, holding it lacked locus standi and the contract was frustrated by a government ban order.
KIA WANG v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel a deceptively similar trademark registered in bad faith, affirming the superior rights of the prior user under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Manish Sharma & Ors. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd & Anr.
The court directed the secured creditor to release the property documents upon receipt of payments matching the auction price while reserving rights to claim any balance dues, clarifying that such release does not absolve the borrower from outstanding liabilities.
INDIAN HERBAL STORE PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the amended Rule 89(4)(C) CGST Rules capping export turnover for ITC refund cannot be applied retrospectively to exports before 23.03.2020, entitling the petitioner to refund computed under the pre-amendment rules.
Pradeep Kumar v. Buoyant Logistics Pvt. Ltd.
The High Court set aside the Trial Court’s order striking off the defendant’s written statement for non-payment of costs after the defendant deposited the costs, allowing the defence to be taken on record and further cross-examination.
Sanjay Kumar Pundeer v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that filing a chargesheet within the statutory period completes investigation for default bail purposes, and pending forensic reports or sanction under the Arms Act do not entitle the accused to default bail.
Chandra Shekhar Upadhyay v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed CISF's application for impleadment and review petition, upholding the direction allowing the petitioner to proceed in the CAPF recruitment process based on meeting the prescribed height criteria.
Ashish Bhalla v. State
The Delhi High Court held that an FIR under IPC is maintainable despite ongoing SFIO investigation under the Companies Act, 2013, and refused to quash the FIR on grounds of parallel proceedings or abuse of process.
Aude Priya Donatelle Wacziarg Ep Engel & Ors. v. Pan Macmillan Publishing India Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a suit concerning defamation and copyright infringement over a book publication by recording the parties' settlement and agreed deletions, granting permanent injunctions accordingly.
Burger King Corporation v. Swapnil Patil & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions and directed blocking of fraudulent domain names and freezing of bank accounts to protect Burger King's trademark from unauthorized and deceptive use in fake franchise schemes.
LT COL RAMANDEEP SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to join posting at Ferozpur without prejudice to his rights to seek compassionate posting or premature retirement, mandating expeditious consideration of such applications despite an embargo period.
Prem Babu v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking alternate allotment of a demolished tenement due to delay, non-compliance with payment conditions, and unresolved factual disputes not suitable for writ adjudication.
TIA MAJUMDAR v. STATE & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly proved Will while declaring bequests to attesting witnesses void under Section 67 of the Indian Succession Act.
Behl, Deveshi Madan and Gunjan Soni v. Amar Singh Bhalla
The Delhi High Court held the respondent guilty of civil contempt for wilfully disobeying court orders and breaching undertakings to pay compensation, sentencing him to six months imprisonment.
BAYER CORPORATION & ANR v. CIPLA LTD
The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a lawful Settlement Agreement between Bayer Corporation and Cipla Ltd, allowing withdrawal of the suit and counterclaim.
Asha Gupta & Anr. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of MPD 2021 provisions permitting zero rear setback for plots up to 250 sq. meters and dismissed the petition challenging sanctioned construction on grounds of violation of fundamental rights and building laws.
Manoj Dwivedi v. State Through Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings under Section 174A IPC against the petitioner, holding that offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC do not warrant declaration as Proclaimed Offender under Section 82 Cr.P.C.
Bureau of Indian Standard Laboratory Employees Association v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus to notify proposed amendments to BIS recruitment regulations, holding that executive discretion in framing rules is not subject to judicial interference absent violation of fundamental or statutory rights.