Delhi High Court
33,441 judgments
Jaya Venugopal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed matrimonial dispute-related criminal complaints based on a voluntary, comprehensive settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process and promote amicable resolution.
Sidhartha Extension Pocket C Residents Welfare Association v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the RRTS route change, holding the decision to adopt Option 3 was technically justified, non-arbitrary, and balanced public interest with property rights.
Ankit Kumar v. Tina Garg
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Family Court's territorial jurisdiction ruling in a divorce proceeding, holding that repeated jurisdictional challenges after final findings constitute abuse of process.
Anjali Sharma v. Nikhil Sharma
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal against dissolution of marriage by recording a mutual settlement between the parties, enforcing terms related to maintenance, alimony, and pending litigations.
Raytheon Company v. Controller General of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court allowed Raytheon's appeal, setting aside the patent refusal based on outdated guidelines and directing fresh examination under the 2017 CRI Guidelines focusing on technical contribution rather than novel hardware.
Shiv Kumar Jatia & Anr. v. Satyam Kanoi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent Administrator to manage a deadlocked Public Trust's affairs, granting supervisory control but prohibiting property alienation, to ensure effective administration and statutory compliance.
Anita v. Amit Bhardwaj
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court decree granting divorce on grounds of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, emphasizing that persistent mental trauma and apprehension of false criminal implication constitute cruelty justifying dissolution of marriage.
Filatex India Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim stay on a time-barred notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, issued for AY 2012-13, pending consideration of limitation issues involving search actions.
Rusan Pharma Limited v. Central Medical Services Society
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of a pharmaceutical tender bid due to expired certificates, holding that valid documents must exist on the tender opening date and post-opening documents cannot be considered.
M/S POONAWALLA FINCORP LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court quashed a mechanically issued show cause notice demanding blocked Input Tax Credit for failure to disclose reasons, affirming that such notices must be based on a prima facie belief of wrongful availment under the CGST Act.
NO.2 TILAK MARG G.H.FLAT BUYERS ASSOCIATION v. M/S RAVINDRA PROPERTIES P. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit filed by an unregistered flat buyers association for specific performance and declaration, holding it lacked locus standi and the contract was frustrated by a government ban order.
KIA WANG v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel a deceptively similar trademark registered in bad faith, affirming the superior rights of the prior user under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Manish Sharma & Ors. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd & Anr.
The court directed the secured creditor to release the property documents upon receipt of payments matching the auction price while reserving rights to claim any balance dues, clarifying that such release does not absolve the borrower from outstanding liabilities.
INDIAN HERBAL STORE PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the amended Rule 89(4)(C) CGST Rules capping export turnover for ITC refund cannot be applied retrospectively to exports before 23.03.2020, entitling the petitioner to refund computed under the pre-amendment rules.
Pradeep Kumar v. Buoyant Logistics Pvt. Ltd.
The High Court set aside the Trial Court’s order striking off the defendant’s written statement for non-payment of costs after the defendant deposited the costs, allowing the defence to be taken on record and further cross-examination.
Sanjay Kumar Pundeer v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that filing a chargesheet within the statutory period completes investigation for default bail purposes, and pending forensic reports or sanction under the Arms Act do not entitle the accused to default bail.
Chandra Shekhar Upadhyay v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed CISF's application for impleadment and review petition, upholding the direction allowing the petitioner to proceed in the CAPF recruitment process based on meeting the prescribed height criteria.
Ashish Bhalla v. State
The Delhi High Court held that an FIR under IPC is maintainable despite ongoing SFIO investigation under the Companies Act, 2013, and refused to quash the FIR on grounds of parallel proceedings or abuse of process.
Aude Priya Donatelle Wacziarg Ep Engel & Ors. v. Pan Macmillan Publishing India Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a suit concerning defamation and copyright infringement over a book publication by recording the parties' settlement and agreed deletions, granting permanent injunctions accordingly.
Burger King Corporation v. Swapnil Patil & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions and directed blocking of fraudulent domain names and freezing of bank accounts to protect Burger King's trademark from unauthorized and deceptive use in fake franchise schemes.