Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Axis Finance Limited v. Avinash Yerramsetty
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or validity.
Axis Finance Limited v. Dr. Mahesh S
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court’s role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed the sole arbitrator accordingly.
Proactive Data Systems Pvt Ltd v. Planex Interior Design Solutions LLP
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed the sole arbitrator despite the respondent's refusal to consent.
M/S. SINGH FINLEASE PVT. LTD. v. M/S. TRICITY EDUCATORS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing a sole arbitrator after prima facie finding the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and not validity or arbitrability.
Pooja Mourya v. Adwait Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing an arbitrator upon prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement in a rent dispute, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence of the arbitration clause.
ANKUSH RANA AND ORS v. ICAR-INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that fixation of cut-off dates for Ph.D. admissions by ICAR is a policy decision not subject to judicial interference unless arbitrary, and dismissed the petition seeking extension of the cut-off date.
Sukhvinder Singh Rathi Security Agency v. Sunita Sharma and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte reinstatement award for lack of proper service of summons, emphasizing the mandatory nature of procedural fairness under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Mahender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that directing a BSF personnel to return to his parent Battalion after acquittal in a GSFC trial is lawful and not harassment, emphasizing the need for written communication of decisions and reserving rights against any unlawful retrial.
Umesh S v. Priti S
The Delhi High Court modified interim orders allowing the wife to reside in a leased matrimonial home until lease expiry and eviction, directing expeditious adjudication of alternate accommodation while dismissing attempts to vacate interim stay based on alleged financial misrepresentation.
Deepika Talwar & Anr v. Shalini Chodhary Sharma
The Delhi High Court modified an interim order to grant appellants access to disputed terrace keys, balancing co-owners' rights pending final trial adjudication.
M/S CHAMUNDESHWARI PHARMACY v. M/S SARASWATI ENTERPRISES
The Delhi High Court held that a dispute resolution clause ambiguously referring to arbitration as a preliminary step before court proceedings does not mandate exclusive arbitration, and dismissed the appeal seeking referral to arbitration.
Om Prakash v. The Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the rejection of premature release of a life convict for non-application of mind and directed reconsideration in accordance with prison rules and legal principles.
Hockey India v. Hockey Bihar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's interim injunction staying the disaffiliation of Hockey Bihar by Hockey India, allowing the dispute to be adjudicated on merits while preserving the federation's right to seek action for future violations.
Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Seema Saraswat
The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination and appointment, holding that medical board findings cannot be disregarded without reasoned consideration.
Union of India & Ors. v. Pawan Ballabh Thapliyal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that relief granted by a High Court judgment confined by the Supreme Court to a specific party cannot be extended to others by a tribunal without fresh adjudication on merits.
Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Vishal Samadhiya
The Delhi High Court held that consistent medical board findings supported by specialist opinion cannot be set aside merely on conflicting reports from non-specialist hospitals, limiting judicial interference in medical fitness decisions for disciplined forces recruitment.
Rakesh Kumar Sarswa v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw his writ petition challenging promotions with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same issue.
Anoop Kumar Garg v. The Commissioner of Customs (Imports)
The Delhi High Court held that amounts deposited under protest and during investigation must be considered for pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, allowing appeals dismissed by CESTAT for non-payment of fresh pre-deposit to be heard on merits.
Shri Ram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Maya Devi and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's award granting compensation with a one-third deduction for personal expenses to an unmarried deceased whose mother and unmarried sister were dependents, affirming flexibility in applying standard deduction norms.
Tarun Kumar Patel v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's refusal to interfere with a pending show cause notice regarding exhaustion of promotion chances, allowing limited opportunity to file a supplementary response.