Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Master Mukul v. Surender Kumar & Ors

15 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10134
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a minor accident victim by applying minimum skilled wages with future prospects for loss of earning capacity and awarding adequate amounts for prosthetic limb replacements and non-pecuniary damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of earning capacity minor claimant minimum wages prosthetic limb compensation

ABP PVT LTD v. ITC HOTELS LTD & ORS

15 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10039-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld interlocutory orders refusing to reject the plaint and denying stay of a defamation suit by corporate entities, clarifying the limited scope of plaint rejection and applicability of Section 10 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 10 CPC cause of action locus standi

Gautam Khaitan & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

15 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10040-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a Provisional Attachment Order under the PMLA issued without a charge sheet, affirming the preventive nature of such orders and limiting writ interference.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Provisional Attachment Order Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 5 PMLA Section 173 CrPC

Shukal Gupta v. Employees State Insurance Corporation

15 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10037

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay and substitution of legal representatives in an ESIC appeal due to prolonged, unexplained delay exceeding two years, resulting in the abatement of the appeal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay substitution of legal representatives Order XXII Rule 3 CPC Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948

Upendra Singh Kushwaha Alias Munna and Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

15 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10058

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 227/2019 and all proceedings therefrom under various IPC sections based on an amicable settlement reached through mediation, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Vikas Gupta & Anr. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

15 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10059

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 290/106 BNS (288/304A IPC) based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offence

Ashok Kumar v. Lakshita Chandel

15 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10077

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside an ex-parte decree for non-filing of written statement on medical grounds, directing the defendant to file the statement with costs and proceed on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte decree Order VIII Rule 10 CPC Order IX Rule 13 CPC written statement

M/S PASSERINE WEALTH SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S R3PM HOSPITALITY LLP AND ANR

14 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10717

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator by mutual consent under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 despite the arbitration clause providing for a three-member tribunal.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 12(2) appointment of arbitrator

CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited v. Indusind Bank

14 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:10030

The Delhi High Court directed the Debts Recovery Tribunal to defer final hearing until the Appellate Tribunal grants a preliminary hearing, emphasizing natural justice and invalidity of unsanctioned praecipe procedures.

civil petition_allowed Significant Debts Recovery Tribunal Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal praecipe natural justice

Sonu Dahiya v. State NCT of Delhi

14 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10006

The Delhi High Court held that the period of interim bail extended as emergency parole during the COVID-19 pandemic must be counted towards the sentence undergone by the convicted prisoner.

criminal petition_allowed Significant emergency parole interim bail sentence computation COVID-19 pandemic

Shamshad Ahmad v. State NCT of Delhi

14 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10007

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s bail application, holding that bail once granted should not be cancelled without material change or misuse, emphasizing protection of personal liberty in a financial fraud case primarily based on documentary evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail cancellation Section 409 IPC Section 420 IPC Section 120B IPC

Rakesh Singh v. Amit Kumar

14 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10036

The Delhi High Court held that only the registered conveyance deed dated 12.12.2002 confers valid title, declared subsequent sale deeds forged and void, and dismissed the subsequent purchaser's claim for ownership.

property appeal_dismissed Significant property dispute sale deed registration Transfer of Property Act

Directorate of Enforcement v. Poonam Malik

14 Nov 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9981-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of ED's freezing orders under PMLA for lack of 'reason to believe' and procedural non-compliance, affirming that mere suspicion is insufficient to freeze property.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 17 freezing order reason to believe mere suspicion

Kunal Gosain and Kartikey Sikka v. Jupinder Kaur Maker

14 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9978

The Delhi High Court held that a consent order recording settlement terms with an undertaking to the Court is enforceable through contempt proceedings, and wilful disobedience thereof constitutes civil contempt.

civil conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court consent order undertaking to court wilful disobedience

RI NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WORLD PHONE INTERNET SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

14 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10032

The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising between telecom service providers under an operational merger agreement fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the TDSAT, barring civil court suits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal Section 14 TRAI Act exclusive jurisdiction

Didar Singh & Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

14 Nov 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:9973-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction based on consistent and reliable dying declarations and corroborative circumstantial evidence, affirming that a voluntary dying declaration can solely sustain a conviction even without magistrate recording or medical certification.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC murder corroboration

K P Rana v. Delhi Development Authority

14 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:9983-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of parts of an arbitral award that improperly awarded claims beyond contractual terms and emphasized limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Deviated items

M/S ALPRO INDUSTRIES v. M/S AMBIENCE PVT. LIMITED & ANR.

14 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:9991

The Delhi High Court set aside an interim arbitral award due to the unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator without an express waiver in writing, holding such appointment void ab initio under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant unilateral appointment Section 12(5) Arbitration Act express waiver in writing nullity of arbitral award

M/S Satveer Sharma v. Global Canesugar Services Pvt Ltd

14 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator accordingly, leaving all substantive issues for arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement

Libra Associates v. Dabur India Ltd

14 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10784
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator by one party violates the Arbitration Act's impartiality requirements and appointed a neutral arbitrator under Section 11.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 12(5) unilateral appointment