Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited v. Indusind Bank

14 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:10030

The Delhi High Court directed the Debts Recovery Tribunal to defer final hearing until the Appellate Tribunal grants a preliminary hearing, emphasizing natural justice and invalidity of unsanctioned praecipe procedures.

civil petition_allowed Significant Debts Recovery Tribunal Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal praecipe natural justice

Sonu Dahiya v. State NCT of Delhi

14 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10006

The Delhi High Court held that the period of interim bail extended as emergency parole during the COVID-19 pandemic must be counted towards the sentence undergone by the convicted prisoner.

criminal petition_allowed Significant emergency parole interim bail sentence computation COVID-19 pandemic

Shamshad Ahmad v. State NCT of Delhi

14 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10007

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s bail application, holding that bail once granted should not be cancelled without material change or misuse, emphasizing protection of personal liberty in a financial fraud case primarily based on documentary evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail cancellation Section 409 IPC Section 420 IPC Section 120B IPC

Rakesh Singh v. Amit Kumar

14 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10036

The Delhi High Court held that only the registered conveyance deed dated 12.12.2002 confers valid title, declared subsequent sale deeds forged and void, and dismissed the subsequent purchaser's claim for ownership.

property appeal_dismissed Significant property dispute sale deed registration Transfer of Property Act

Directorate of Enforcement v. Poonam Malik

14 Nov 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9981-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of ED's freezing orders under PMLA for lack of 'reason to believe' and procedural non-compliance, affirming that mere suspicion is insufficient to freeze property.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 17 freezing order reason to believe mere suspicion

Kunal Gosain and Kartikey Sikka v. Jupinder Kaur Maker

14 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9978

The Delhi High Court held that a consent order recording settlement terms with an undertaking to the Court is enforceable through contempt proceedings, and wilful disobedience thereof constitutes civil contempt.

civil conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court consent order undertaking to court wilful disobedience

RI NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WORLD PHONE INTERNET SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

14 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10032

The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising between telecom service providers under an operational merger agreement fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the TDSAT, barring civil court suits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal Section 14 TRAI Act exclusive jurisdiction

Didar Singh & Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

14 Nov 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:9973-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction based on consistent and reliable dying declarations and corroborative circumstantial evidence, affirming that a voluntary dying declaration can solely sustain a conviction even without magistrate recording or medical certification.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC murder corroboration

K P Rana v. Delhi Development Authority

14 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:9983-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of parts of an arbitral award that improperly awarded claims beyond contractual terms and emphasized limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Deviated items

M/S ALPRO INDUSTRIES v. M/S AMBIENCE PVT. LIMITED & ANR.

14 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:9991

The Delhi High Court set aside an interim arbitral award due to the unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator without an express waiver in writing, holding such appointment void ab initio under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant unilateral appointment Section 12(5) Arbitration Act express waiver in writing nullity of arbitral award

M/S Satveer Sharma v. Global Canesugar Services Pvt Ltd

14 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator accordingly, leaving all substantive issues for arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement

Libra Associates v. Dabur India Ltd

14 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10784
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator by one party violates the Arbitration Act's impartiality requirements and appointed a neutral arbitrator under Section 11.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 12(5) unilateral appointment

Ankur Gauri @ Ankur & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

14 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10423

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354(B), 509, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the victim's unwillingness to proceed, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS non-compoundable offences settlement

Roop Singh @ Rupesh Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

14 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10422

The Delhi High Court quashed a noncompoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent powers Section 528 BNSS

Vikrant Mathur & Anr. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

14 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10420

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 377, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable settlement and absence of prosecution interest, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 528 BNSS quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute

Saleem Ahmad v. The State, NCT of Delhi & Anr.

14 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10421
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of a Section 138 NI Act offence after conviction and dismissal of appeal upon amicable settlement, imposing costs as per Supreme Court guidelines.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act compounding of offence cheque bounce conviction after appeal

Shangri-La International Hotel Management Pte. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax (International Tax)-3, Delhi & Ors.

14 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10025-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s revision petition under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, setting aside the impugned order and directing consequential relief, rejecting the respondent’s reliance on a pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 264 Income Tax Act Revision petition maintainability Section 143(1) Income Tax Act Refund under Section 244A

Shangri-La International Hotel Management Pte. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax (International Tax)-3 Delhi & Ors.

14 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10028-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's revision application under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, setting aside the impugned order and directing consequential relief, relying on binding precedents and closure of related Supreme Court proceedings.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 264 Income Tax Act Revision petition Income Tax assessment Section 143(1) Income Tax Act

Amit Singh & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

14 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10378

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent powers of High Court Section 528 BNSS

M/S MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. MR. RAJEEV GUPTA PROPRIETOR OF GRANITE GALAXY

14 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or merits.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie examination arbitration agreement