Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Azidul Hoque & Ors. v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd & Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10213

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking electricity connection on private land occupied without ownership rights, holding that proof of ownership is mandatory outside notified JJ Clusters and illegal occupants cannot claim connection as a matter of right.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant electricity connection Jhuggi Jhopri Cluster proof of ownership Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission Regulations 2017

Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh; Ms. Aliza Alam; Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat v. Sh Mohinder Singh Lohia

17 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10205-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order directing pay fixation implementation for respondents, holding that a subsequent Supreme Court ruling cannot reopen an already implemented and unchallenged pay fixation order.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant pay fixation increment Fundamental Rule 22 Central Administrative Tribunal

Karan Luthra v. Late Shri M. K. Subba

17 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10163-DB

The High Court held that a suit for specific performance is not barred by limitation unless there is an explicit and communicated refusal to perform, and silence or non-response does not constitute refusal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance limitation Article 54 Limitation Act Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Siddharth Goswami; Geetanjali Reddy; Aditya Sachdeva v. M/S Manmohan Singh Wadhwa Constructions Pvt Ltd

17 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10181-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi's commercial appeal due to a 99-day delay in filing, holding that in commercial matters delay must be short and accompanied by bona fide and non-negligent conduct to be condoned.

commercial appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay commercial appeal limitation period bona fide

Manish Kumar Singh and Mritunjay v. Sarat Chandra Panda

17 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of sound health at entry and limiting writ interference to errors of law apparent on record.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension primary hypertension armed forces tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Anish Muralidhar v. Ex NB Sub Dori Lal

17 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is service-related absent contrary proof and limiting its review to errors of law under certiorari jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Singh and Sgt. Mritunjay v. Sgt. Ranvir

17 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent proof to the contrary and limiting its review to jurisdictional errors under certiorari.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Amarjeet Rana & Ors. v. Gulshan Verma (Deceased) Through LRs & Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10190-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the execution court's order attaching property held under unregistered GPAs, ruling that such possession does not confer ownership to obstruct decree execution.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant execution proceedings attachment of property General Power of Attorney registered sale deed

Salim v. State (NCT of Delhi)

17 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10210
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 392 IPC but modified the sentence by releasing the appellant on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, considering his clean antecedents and social background.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 392 IPC Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 probation robbery

Sub Inspector O Tuipa Maram v. Union of India and Ors

17 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10179-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the five-year regular service requirement in the Recruitment Rules for promotion to Assistant Commandant in SSB, dismissing the petition challenging its validity against the 2024 vacancies.

administrative petition_dismissed Recruitment Rules Assistant Commandant Sashastra Seema Bal Limited Departmental Competitive Examination

Satbir v. Union of India

17 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10157-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous following events during its pendency.

other other writ petition infructuous petition disposal of petition pendency

Assistant Director v. Gautam Khaitan

17 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10103

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Enforcement Directorate's petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to Gautam Khaitan, holding that the prosecution failed to prove abuse of bail conditions or sufficient grounds for cancellation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant cancellation of bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act Enforcement Directorate Agusta Westland case

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Bindu Devi and Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10153

The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award applying Delhi minimum wages and recognizing major married sons as legal representatives entitled to compensation despite earning.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim minimum wages dependency legal representatives

Ashok Kumar Kaushik & Anr. v. Mahipal Singh & Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10123-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that the period for filing Replication runs from the date the Plaintiff receives the complete Written Statement along with all documents, and documents filed later cannot be relied upon, dismissing the appeal against refusal to condone delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Replication period Written Statement Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 Rule 2

Deepak Malhotra v. State

17 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10172

The Delhi High Court allowed modification of a passport renewal order permitting the petitioner to renew his passport for ten years and travel abroad without prior court permission despite pending criminal cases, relying on statutory provisions and government relaxation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Passport Act, 1967 Section 6(2)(f) Section 222 Passport Act passport renewal

Vaneeta Impex Private Limited v. Union of India

17 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10136-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that while distinct demands under Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act do not constitute the same subject matter barring multiple demands, pre-deposit cannot be charged twice for the same amount, allowing the petitioner to appeal without additional pre-deposit.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 6(2)(b) CGST Act pre-deposit Input Tax Credit fraudulent availment

Puja Kumari v. Commissioner of Customs

17 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10135-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate order allowing redemption of detained personal gift goods on payment of fine and customs duty, dismissed departmental revision, and waived warehousing charges due to delay.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 absolute confiscation redemption fine non-declaration

TCNS Clothing Company Limited v. Sunil Kumar & Anr.

17 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10062-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a dispute arising from a lease of property actually used for commercial purposes falls within the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, even if the property is residential by municipal classification.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 commercial dispute immovable property lease agreement

Hamdard Education Society & Anr. v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10102

The Delhi High Court held that the RBI Ombudsman lacked jurisdiction to entertain a third-party complaint by the University regarding HIMSR's bank accounts and dismissed the petitioners' interim application to de-freeze the accounts, emphasizing procedural compliance and balance of convenience.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant RBI Ombudsman jurisdiction KYC compliance bank account freezing Family Settlement Deed

Chattar Singh v. Delhi Cantonment Board

17 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10127

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a regularization application for unauthorized construction on defense land and stayed demolition proceedings pending its consideration.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant regularization application unauthorized construction defense land Delhi Cantonment Board