Delhi High Court
102,696 judgments
INTENSE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED v. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator by consent of parties and continued interim stay on encashment of Performance Bank Guarantee pending arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Kanak Exports v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Kanak Exports' appeal, upholding the Supreme Court's finding that fraudulent exports precluded entitlement to DFCE Scheme benefits and no vested rights were deprived by government notifications.
M/S Supreme Infrastructure India Ltd. v. Engineer-in-Chief, Army HQ
The Delhi High Court restored an appeal dismissed for default, allowed its withdrawal, and granted liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the dismissal of the underlying Section 34 arbitration petition.
Palika Bazar Shopkeepers Welfare Association v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the no-vending status of Connaught Place, restrained issuance of vending certificates in no-vending zones, and directed stakeholder consultations before final approval of the Town Vending Plan under the Street Vendors Act.
Devender Kumar Aggarwal & Anr. v. Praveen Kumar
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act to adjudicate disputes arising from an LLP Agreement, holding that the arbitration clause was valid and pre-arbitration consultation requirement was satisfied.
Pappu Singh & Others v. Gammon India and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that acceptance of compensation deposited suo moto under the Workmen's Compensation Act does not bar a civil suit for damages arising from construction negligence causing fatal metro pillar collapse.
Hitik Malhan v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging tax assessment proceedings, holding that judicial interference under Article 226 is not warranted merely on factual disputes without jurisdictional infirmity.
Lakshmi Jatav & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of a compromise and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Him Tyagi and Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Satinder Kaur v. Girish Chander Verma
The Delhi High Court held that the deposit condition under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for suspension of sentence is not rigid and can be relaxed, and directed consolidation of related appeals for expeditious disposal.
Zulfikar & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs registered for non-serious offences arising from a private dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers.
Shri Praveen Upadhyay and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Pushpender Gautam v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 338 IPC based on a compromise between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in a private dispute without public interest.
Constable Harpreet Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the ITBP to obtain a compliant medical opinion under Rule 26(3) before deciding on the petitioner’s referral to the Review Medical Board and restrained coercive action pending such decision.
M/S JIA LAL KISHORI LAL PRIVATE LIMITED v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit is not barred by limitation on the face of the plaint where acknowledgment and continuous cause of action exist, and rejected the defendants' application to dismiss the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.
Shubham Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh and independent physical standard test for the petitioner challenging his disqualification on chest expansion grounds, binding parties to the outcome.
Smt. Chanda Devi & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation for death by accidental fall from train, holding the deceased was not a bona fide passenger and the incident was not proven as an untoward incident under the Railways Act.
Prashant Kumar Jha v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Section 354D IPC due to victim's unwillingness to continue prosecution, imposing costs on the petitioner as deterrence.
State NCT of Delhi v. Asha Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition to cancel bail granted under the NDPS Act, holding that bail cannot be denied without incriminating evidence despite seriousness of offence or alleged evasiveness during interrogation.
Ravinder Rana v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to expeditiously decide on concurrence for the petitioner’s premature release recommended by the Sentence Review Board and granted temporary exemption from surrender on humanitarian grounds.