Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Salim v. State (NCT of Delhi)

17 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10210
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 392 IPC but modified the sentence by releasing the appellant on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, considering his clean antecedents and social background.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 392 IPC Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 probation robbery

Sub Inspector O Tuipa Maram v. Union of India and Ors

17 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10179-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the five-year regular service requirement in the Recruitment Rules for promotion to Assistant Commandant in SSB, dismissing the petition challenging its validity against the 2024 vacancies.

administrative petition_dismissed Recruitment Rules Assistant Commandant Sashastra Seema Bal Limited Departmental Competitive Examination

Satbir v. Union of India

17 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10157-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous following events during its pendency.

other other writ petition infructuous petition disposal of petition pendency

Assistant Director v. Gautam Khaitan

17 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10103

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Enforcement Directorate's petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to Gautam Khaitan, holding that the prosecution failed to prove abuse of bail conditions or sufficient grounds for cancellation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant cancellation of bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act Enforcement Directorate Agusta Westland case

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Bindu Devi and Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10153

The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award applying Delhi minimum wages and recognizing major married sons as legal representatives entitled to compensation despite earning.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim minimum wages dependency legal representatives

Ashok Kumar Kaushik & Anr. v. Mahipal Singh & Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10123-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the period for filing Replication runs from the date the Plaintiff receives the complete Written Statement along with all documents, and documents filed later cannot be relied upon, dismissing the appeal against refusal to condone delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Replication period Written Statement Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 Rule 2

Deepak Malhotra v. State

17 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10172

The Delhi High Court allowed modification of a passport renewal order permitting the petitioner to renew his passport for ten years and travel abroad without prior court permission despite pending criminal cases, relying on statutory provisions and government relaxation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Passport Act, 1967 Section 6(2)(f) Section 222 Passport Act passport renewal

Vaneeta Impex Private Limited v. Union of India

17 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10136-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that while distinct demands under Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act do not constitute the same subject matter barring multiple demands, pre-deposit cannot be charged twice for the same amount, allowing the petitioner to appeal without additional pre-deposit.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 6(2)(b) CGST Act pre-deposit Input Tax Credit fraudulent availment

Puja Kumari v. Commissioner of Customs

17 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10135-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate order allowing redemption of detained personal gift goods on payment of fine and customs duty, dismissed departmental revision, and waived warehousing charges due to delay.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 absolute confiscation redemption fine non-declaration

TCNS Clothing Company Limited v. Sunil Kumar & Anr.

17 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10062-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a dispute arising from a lease of property actually used for commercial purposes falls within the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, even if the property is residential by municipal classification.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 commercial dispute immovable property lease agreement

Hamdard Education Society & Anr. v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10102

The Delhi High Court held that the RBI Ombudsman lacked jurisdiction to entertain a third-party complaint by the University regarding HIMSR's bank accounts and dismissed the petitioners' interim application to de-freeze the accounts, emphasizing procedural compliance and balance of convenience.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant RBI Ombudsman jurisdiction KYC compliance bank account freezing Family Settlement Deed

Chattar Singh v. Delhi Cantonment Board

17 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10127

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a regularization application for unauthorized construction on defense land and stayed demolition proceedings pending its consideration.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant regularization application unauthorized construction defense land Delhi Cantonment Board

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan v. Arushi Tanwar

17 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10042-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing consideration of a reserved category candidate under the unreserved category on merit despite original application under OBC, emphasizing merit-based selection and natural justice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant reservation category change unreserved category merit-based selection

Union of India v. Kamal Kishore

17 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10041-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing full reimbursement of emergency medical expenses incurred at a non-empanelled hospital to a retired government servant under CGHS, emphasizing the primacy of the right to life over technical restrictions on rates.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant CGHS reimbursement medical emergency non-empanelled hospital Article 21

Chandan v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

17 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10126
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions of appellants for armed robbery under Sections 392, 397, 411 IPC and Arms Act, affirming the reliability of eyewitness identification and recovery evidence despite minor contradictions and non-examination of some witnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant robbery identification recovery deadly weapon

Monu v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10122-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing that a candidate not be disqualified from recruitment due to identical entries in name and surname fields when the candidate has no surname.

administrative petition_allowed recruitment name discrepancy application form Indo Tibetan Border Police

DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD v. SUBHASH

17 Nov 2025 · CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J. · 2025:DHC:10082

The Delhi High Court held that the respondent's claim for illegal termination was barred by the statutory limitation period under the amended Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the Labour Court's order in his favor.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 limitation period Section 2A Section 10(4A)

Deepak Gupta v. Rajeev Agarwal & Anr

17 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10081

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a registered Will with minor signed alterations and dismissed the appeal challenging the grant of probate to the beneficiary despite absence of a named executor.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Succession Act, 1925 probate Will validity testator's sound mind

Jyoti Prasad v. East End Enterprises & Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10078

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's refusal to condone delay in substitution of legal representatives and holding that the appellants lacked statutory right to continue the suit under the Fatal Accidents Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay sufficient cause abatement substitution of legal representatives

Anuradha Tewari v. Bal Kishan

17 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10079
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to direct deposit of rent arrears under Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC where the landlord-tenant relationship and liability were disputed.

civil appeal_dismissed Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC landlord-tenant relationship interlocutory application rent arrears