Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
ICICI BANK LTD v. SATVEER SINGH
The High Court set aside the trial court's procedural order and directed issuance of summons and adherence to the Civil Procedure Code in suit adjudication.
ICICI BANK LTD v. JITENDRA SHARMA & ORS.
The High Court set aside the trial court's procedural order and directed it to issue summons and proceed with the suit as per the Civil Procedure Code.
MANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED v. M/S. AMR POWER PRIVATE LIMITED
The Supreme Court upheld the termination of a Power Purchase Agreement due to continuous payment defaults by the distribution licensee, affirming the validity of contractual termination procedures and rejecting the appellant's challenge.
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld NMRCL's disqualification of GYT-TPL JV's bid for failing to meet the 'metro civil construction work' eligibility, emphasizing deference to the employer's interpretation of tender conditions absent mala fide or perversity.
R. Mahalakshmi v. A. Kanchana and Ors.
The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's civil appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment for misinterpreting the remand order and directing inclusion of all inherited properties in the partition suit as per the 1989 Tamil Nadu amendment.
Union of India v. M/s Indusind Bank Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that the 1997 amendment to Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act is prospective and does not invalidate pre-amendment bank guarantee clauses limiting claim periods that do not restrict the time to enforce rights by legal proceedings.
R. Rajashekar and Ors. v. Trinity House Building Co-Operative Society and Ors.
Acquisition of land without a framed and government-approved housing scheme under Section 3(f)(vi) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and influenced by a middleman agreement, is invalid and liable to be quashed.
Secretary, Tamilnadu Public Service Commission v. A.B. Natarajan & Ors.
The Supreme Court allowed review petitions to permit continuation in service of Tamil Nadu State service candidates appointed through TNPSC despite alleged examination irregularities, emphasizing the lack of adequate opportunity to represent their case and exercising its powers under Article 142.
Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala
The Supreme Court set aside the murder conviction and death sentence, substituting it with conviction for grievous hurt, while upholding rape and other convictions, emphasizing the necessity of proving intention or knowledge for murder liability.
GLOBAL CEMENT LTD v. DEPUTY REGISTRAR, HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
The Supreme Court set aside a High Court contempt order directing deposit of amounts without basis and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.
Malhotra Book Depot & Ors v. MBD Electronics Pvt Ltd
Permanent injunction granted restraining defendant from using the trademark "MBD" based on plaintiffs' registered trademark and uncontested ex parte evidence.
Om Prakash Sharma v. Dr Ashwani Kumar Seth
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition, holding that delay in filing leave to defend under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act cannot be condoned merely on grounds of family emergency.
Chunni Lal & Ors v. Mukesh Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in an eviction petition allowing the tenants extended possession on payment of damages, with the landlord agreeing to withhold eviction execution subject to compliance.
Shashl Shekhar@Neeraj v. State of Not of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted a four-week extension of parole to the petitioner on the ground of his daughter's fixed marriage, directing release on the same terms as the original parole.
Suresh v. State
The Delhi High Court granted one month parole to the petitioner for house reconstruction and maintaining family ties, subject to furnishing bond and surety.
Deepak v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The petitioner withdrew the criminal writ petition before the Delhi High Court, leading to its disposal as withdrawn and the connected miscellaneous application as infructuous.
Bhoop Singh @ Pappu v. State
The Delhi High Court granted parole for one month to a long-term convict who had previously availed parole without misuse, emphasizing parole’s rehabilitative benefits.
Birju Chihietri v. State
The Delhi High Court granted parole for one month to a prisoner to assist his chronically ill wife, emphasizing humanitarian grounds and prior good conduct during parole.
Geeta Bhateja v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC based on a bona fide compromise between the parties and the complainant's no objection to the quashing.
Jai Ram v. Respondent
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of parole due to the petitioner's unsatisfactory jail conduct involving punishments, upholding the administrative decision under the Parole/Furlough Guidelines, 2010.