Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Swararaj @ Raj Shrikant Thakeray & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning orders for lack of mandatory inquiry and prior sanction but refused to quash the criminal complaint alleging provocative speech hurting religious sentiments.
(West), Mumbai – 400 0091 ) v. 1 THE MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AREA)
The Bombay High Court clarified the scope of statutory powers and procedural requirements for building permissions and redevelopment under Maharashtra housing laws, emphasizing lawful administrative action and judicial oversight.
wpst18942022 2ece006d
The Bombay High Court held that admission to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas requires candidates to be residents of the district where the school is located and dismissed petitions challenging rejection of admissions for failure to submit residence certificates.
wp159382022 36c3c450
The Bombay High Court dismissed petitions challenging the MPSC's revised answer keys for the State Civil Services Examination, affirming limited judicial review and estoppel against multiple challenges.
Pratibha Sanjay Padamalwar v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
The Bombay High Court upheld MCGM's policy limiting compassionate appointments to family members of medically invalidated employees below 50 years, dismissing the petition challenging the age restriction.
Arun Sampatrao Patil v. Amruta Laxman Waghmare & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that an assignment of property made in violation of a court injunction during suit pendency is null and void, and the assignee cannot be impleaded in the appeal under Order XXII Rule 10 or Section 146 CPC.
Jamshid Kersi Dalal & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that the State Government's sanction of a Draft Development Plan modification permitting a road through Green Belt land without following statutory procedure is illegal and quashed that modification while upholding others.
Salim Naim Khan & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of land acquisition for community purposes under the MRTP Act, dismissing petitions challenging the acquisition initiated at the instance of a private trust and emphasizing procedural compliance and public purpose.
Pondicherry Basketball Association v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the flawed BFI election results due to improper rejection of nominations and directed fresh elections under independent supervision to ensure free and fair process.
Venigalla Koteswaramma v. Malempati Suryamba
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that the unregistered agreement for sale was valid and binding despite the Will being fabricated, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the agreement's validity.
Anversinh @ Kiransinh Fatesinh Zala v. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court upheld kidnapping convictions of a minor despite a consensual relationship, emphasizing that consent of a minor is immaterial under Section 361 IPC, but reduced the sentence considering mitigating factors.
Anversinh @ Kiransinh Fatesinh Zala v. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court upheld the kidnapping conviction of a minor despite a consensual relationship but reduced the sentence considering mitigating factors.
Murali v. State rep. by the Inspector of Police
The Supreme Court held that while offences under Sections 324 and 307 IPC are non-compoundable, an amicable settlement between parties can justify reduction of sentence, and accordingly reduced the appellants' sentences to the period already served.
Manish Kumar v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the 2020 amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code imposing threshold requirements for initiating insolvency by certain financial creditors, including real estate allottees, and upheld immunity provisions for corporate debtors under Section 32A.
Manish Kumar v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the 2020 amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code imposing threshold requirements on certain financial creditors, including home buyers, and affirmed the procedural nature of these safeguards without violating fundamental rights.
Union of India v. K.A. Najeeb
The Supreme Court upheld bail granted under UAPA despite statutory restrictions, emphasizing the constitutional right to speedy trial and prohibiting prolonged pre-trial detention.
Union of India v. K.A. Najeeb
The Supreme Court upheld bail granted under UAPA despite statutory restrictions, emphasizing constitutional right to speedy trial and prolonged pre-trial detention.
Nawal Kishore Sharma v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that a seaman's heart condition not caused by injury during employment does not qualify for 100% disability compensation under the National Maritime Board Agreement, limiting relief to severance pay.
f2ef14c7aef3996a40554ff5ee980f1181c66e7a685cfeda1a75b811701ef672
The appellate court upheld the trial court's conviction and sentence, affirming that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and all procedural and constitutional safeguards were observed.
5c8efc459cf1b732bfb056a18a5079c101677efd46c1441ade25052a88d3b448
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction, affirming that the evidence met the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt and the trial was conducted fairly under constitutional guarantees.