Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Delhi Development Authority v. SK Enterprises
The Delhi High Court set aside the executing court's orders for improper calculation of decretal amount and remanded the matter for fresh computation and consideration of objections regarding interest.
Alliance Petroleum Pvt Ltd v. Balaji Multimetal Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court accepted the parties' voluntary compromise application and disposed of the civil suit in terms of the settlement, with each party bearing its own costs.
ICICI BANK LTD v. JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's order for non-compliance with procedural norms and directed issuance of summons and proper adjudication under the Civil Procedure Code.
ICICI BANK LTD v. KAMLESH DEVI
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's order for non-compliance with procedural requirements and directed it to issue summons and proceed with the suit under the Civil Procedure Code.
ICICI BANK LTD v. UMESH SINGH RAWAT
The High Court set aside the trial court's procedural order and directed adherence to the Civil Procedure Code for issuing summons and proceeding with the civil suit.
Rajinder Kumar Gupta v. Suresh Chand Gupta
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings alleging forgery in property documents, holding that continuation of such proceedings would be an abuse of process where a civil suit on title is pending.
Deeksha Madaan v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court held that recognized unaided schools must adhere to binding Directorate of Education instructions on timing of compartment examinations, quashing premature exam results and directing fresh exams to ensure fair opportunity for student promotion.
Deeksha Madaan v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court held that a private school violated binding Directorate of Education instructions by prematurely conducting compartment exams, quashed the results, and directed a fresh exam to ensure fair promotion of students.
Ravinder v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the conviction for snatching and theft based on medical evidence of swallowed stolen property and concurrent findings of fact by lower courts.
Rajesh @ Tinku v. State of N. C. T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Rajesh @ Tinku for raping a 4-year-old girl, holding that absence of hymenal injury does not negate rape when corroborated by ocular and forensic evidence.
ICICI BANK LTD v. MEERA LAL
The High Court held that a trial court cannot conduct a preliminary inquiry into the merits before issuance of summons and set aside the impugned order, directing summons and appointing a receiver to protect the petitioner’s security interest.
ICICI BANK LTD v. ABHISHEK CONCRETE PVT LTD
The High Court held that a trial court cannot conduct a preliminary inquiry into the merits or require affidavits before issuing summons, and directed the trial court to proceed with the suit as per the Civil Procedure Code.
ICICI BANK LTD v. ANUJ BHATIA
The High Court set aside the trial court's order for non-compliance with procedural norms and directed it to issue summons and proceed with the suit under the Civil Procedure Code.
ICICI BANK LTD v. MUKESH KUMAR
The High Court held that a trial court cannot conduct a preliminary inquiry into the merits before issuing summons and set aside the trial court’s order directing affidavits and explanations, while appointing receivers over the secured vehicle.
Kavita v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's discharge of accused at charge framing stage after considering CCTV evidence negating the prosecution's allegations, affirming the Court's power to sift evidence to ensure a fair trial.
ICICI BANK LTD v. ANIL RAJPUT
The High Court held that a trial court cannot conduct a preliminary inquiry into the merits at the summons stage and directed issuance of summons and appointment of a receiver in a loan recovery suit.
ICICI BANK LTD v. ROHIT PAHWA
The High Court held that a trial court must issue summons upon institution of a suit without conducting a preliminary inquiry into merits, and appointed a receiver to protect the bank's security interest in a vehicle loan recovery suit.
ICICI BANK LTD v. ABRAR HUSSAIN
The Delhi High Court held that a trial court cannot conduct a preliminary inquiry into the merits before issuing summons and set aside the order refusing summons in a loan recovery suit, directing proper procedure and appointing a receiver over the vehicle security.
ICICI BANK LTD v. BALJEET SINGH & ANR.
The High Court set aside the trial court's order conducting a preliminary inquiry before issuing summons in a loan recovery suit, directing issuance of summons and appointing a receiver for the secured vehicle.
ICICI Bank Ltd v. Ishwar Datt Sharma
The High Court held that a trial court cannot conduct a preliminary merit-based inquiry before issuing summons and directed issuance of summons in a loan recovery suit, while appointing a receiver to safeguard the hypothecated vehicle.