Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rajinder Parsad v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking allotment of an alternate plot on the ground that the petitioner's entire land was not acquired, reaffirming the Supreme Court's ruling that only owners whose entire land is acquired and who are left without shelter are eligible for alternate plots.
Rajinder Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an alternate plot allotment application, holding that entitlement arises only when the entire land is acquired, per Supreme Court precedent.
Anita v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire land has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, dismissing the petitioner’s claim.
Kajeshdevi v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose land is only partially acquired and who is not left completely landless is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 Policy, dismissing the petition challenging rejection of such allotment.
Rajbelsingh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire landholding has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, dismissing the petitioner’s claim.
Vijay Pal Godara v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a person is entitled to an alternate plot only if their entire land is acquired, dismissing the petition of a partial landowner seeking such allotment.
Raj Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire landholding has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, dismissing the petitioner’s claim.
Pyare Lal (Deceased) Through LRS v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that under the relevant land acquisition scheme and Supreme Court precedent, a person whose entire land is not acquired is not entitled to an alternate plot, dismissing the petitioner’s claim.
Hari Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a person is entitled to an alternate plot only if his entire land is acquired, and partial acquisition does not confer such entitlement under the 1986 policy.
KIRANJAIN v. AMBER JOSHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt petitions as satisfied after the respondents gave a binding assurance to comply with a supplementary settlement deed.
RAM KAUR v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire land has not been acquired and who still owns balance land is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the Government's rehabilitation scheme.
Pardeep Kumar v. Land & Building Department & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner whose entire land was not acquired is ineligible for allotment of an alternate plot under the rehabilitation scheme, affirming the Supreme Court precedent in Delhi Administration v. Jai Singh Kanwar.
Satyavati & Ors. v. Land & Building Department & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that allotment of alternate plots under the rehabilitation scheme is only available when the entire landholding is acquired, dismissing the petitioners' claim based on partial acquisition.
Amith A. Dumra v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed conversion of a petition for succession certificate into a probate petition under its discretionary powers, directing transfer to the District and Sessions Judge for probate proceedings.
Vikram Singh & Ors v. Saran Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed two petitions as withdrawn following an amicable settlement reached through court mediation.
Ram Lal Yadav v. Master Ranjeet Kumar Minor & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal in default due to non-appearance and failure to bring legal heirs on record after the death of appellant Ram Lal Yadav, coupled with concealment of property sale.
SMT. SHASI-N GARG v. M/S SfflTIZ METALS LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court disposed of the execution petition after the decree holder confirmed execution of Warrants of Possession and satisfaction of the decree.
J.K. Synthetics Ltd. v. M/S Dynamic Cement Traders
The court disposed of the execution petition after the parties settled and the Decree Holder complied with the settlement terms.
Plaintiff v. Cooper Pharma Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against the defendant's use of a deceptively similar trademark but denied damages and delivery of goods as no infringing goods were found and the defendant admitted infringement.
Amritakaur v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel's request.