Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
ICICI BANK LTD v. SAURABH BAKSHI
The High Court held that a trial court cannot conduct a preliminary inquiry into the merits before issuing summons and set aside the order refusing summons in a loan recovery suit, appointing a receiver over the secured vehicle.
ICICI BANK LTD v. GAGANDEEP KAUR
The High Court held that a trial court cannot conduct a preliminary inquiry into the merits before issuing summons and set aside the order refusing summons in a loan recovery suit, while appointing a receiver for the secured vehicle.
ICICI BANK LTD v. PRAKASH SHARMA
The High Court held that a trial court must issue summons before examining merits and set aside the order conducting a preliminary inquiry in a loan recovery suit, appointing a receiver to safeguard the secured asset.
ICICI BANK LTD v. KAMAL
The High Court held that a trial court cannot conduct a preliminary merit-based inquiry before issuing summons and directed issuance of summons and appointment of a receiver in a loan recovery suit.
ICICI BANK LTD v. BASANT KUMAR ARYA
The High Court held that trial courts must issue summons upon suit institution without conducting preliminary jurisdictional inquiries, setting aside the trial court's order that delayed summons issuance.
ICICI BANK LTD v. AMRAPALI TIWARI
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's procedural order and directed it to issue summons and proceed with the suit in accordance with the Civil Procedure Code.
ICICI BANK LTD v. SHREE BHAGWAN & ORS.
The High Court held that a trial court cannot conduct a preliminary inquiry into the merits before issuing summons and set aside the impugned order, directing summons issuance and appointing a receiver over the hypothecated vehicle.
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Jayawati & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the insurer's liability to pay compensation for death despite alleged policy cancellation due to invalid intimation and affirmed inclusion of future prospects in compensation calculation.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rajesh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded for permanent disability in a motor accident claim, set aside penal interest due to pending appeal, and issued directions for safeguarding the awarded amount.
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Rekha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the appeal reducing the compensation awarded for death due to contributory negligence of the deceased in a motor accident claim.
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Vikas Gautam
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the appeal to reduce an excessive motor accident compensation award from Rs.31.49 lakh to Rs.26 lakh with interest, affirming the court's power to moderate compensation based on injury severity and disability.
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Anit Chauhan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the compensation awarded for grievous injuries and permanent disability, holding the amount just and reasonable.
Kusum Devi & Ors. v. Shweta Kumari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court apportioned compensation awarded for a fatal motor accident between the widow and mother of the deceased, excluding siblings from entitlement, and directed regulated disbursement through fixed deposits.
New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Madhu Saini & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Claims Tribunal's compensation award based on the deceased's proved income and future prospects, dismissing the insurer's appeal.
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Reena Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the appeal in a motor accident claim by reducing compensation for loss of love and affection while upholding the rest of the award based on actual income and future prospects, clarifying that minimum wages are not mandatory for compensation calculation.
ICICI BANK LTD v. RAHUL
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's procedural order and directed adherence to the Civil Procedure Code for proper adjudication of the suit filed by ICICI Bank.
Viom Networks Limited v. Videocon Telecommunications Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator on behalf of the respondent under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing constitution of a three-member arbitral tribunal to adjudicate disputes arising from telecom infrastructure agreements.
Col. A.S. Butalia & Ors. v. M/S Superior Films Pvt. Ltd.
The executing court cannot go behind a decree lacking property dimensions but may adjudicate execution disputes by framing issues and leading evidence under Section 47 CPC to ensure proper execution.
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Deepak
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Claims Tribunal's award of compensation for grievous injuries in a motor accident, holding the amount just and reasonable.
ICICI BANK LTD v. SUMIT JAIN
The High Court held that trial courts must follow the exhaustive procedure under the Civil Procedure Code and cannot conduct unauthorized inquiries before issuing summons, setting aside the trial court's order and directing issuance of summons.