Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
AMANPUNIA v. STATE OF NOT OF DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to repeated non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel, despite information about the petitioner's death.
Smt Jasleen Kaur v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's repeated adjournment requests and lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Seema Goyal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of bail challenge petitions with liberty to file cancellation petitions if bail conditions are breached, and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
Mehfooz Alam @ Junaid Khan @ Model v. State of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 307/34 IPC and Arms Act, holding that compromise is not a ground to quash serious offence FIRs.
Harsharan Singh v. State (Govt of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition as abated upon the death of the petitioner during the pendency of the case.
B. N. Singh v. The Registrar, Co-op. Group Housing Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the exclusion of charge-sheeted cooperative society members from regularisation of illegal self-draws for flat allotment under a 2011 notification, dismissing their writ petitions.
Rattan Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition holding that a person whose entire land is not acquired is not entitled to an alternate plot under the government scheme, affirming the Supreme Court's ruling in Delhi Administration v. Jai Singh Kanwar.
SUNIL KUMAR v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an alternate plot allotment application, holding that entitlement arises only when the entire landholding is acquired, following the Supreme Court precedent in Jai Singh Kanwar.
Petitioner v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the principle that entitlement to an alternate plot arises only when the entire land is acquired, dismissing the petitioner's claim based on partial acquisition.
Surajbhan v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire land has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, dismissing the petition challenging the rejection of such allotment.
Rajpal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire landholding is not acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the relevant policy and Supreme Court precedent.
Kishan Chand (Deceased) Through LRS v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an alternate plot allotment application, holding that entitlement arises only when the entire land is acquired, applying the Supreme Court precedent in Jai Singh Kanwar.
Mahender Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of alternate plot allotment, holding that only persons whose entire land is acquired are entitled to alternate plots under the acquisition scheme, as per Supreme Court precedent.
Sukhvir Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a person is entitled to an alternate plot allotment only if his entire land is acquired, dismissing the petition of a landowner whose land was partially acquired.
Jai Pal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire land is not acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, dismissing the petitioner’s claim accordingly.
Mahender Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire land has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the relevant land acquisition policy, dismissing the petitioner’s claim.
Rajbir v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a person is entitled to an alternate plot only if his entire land is acquired, dismissing the petitioner's claim where part of the land remained unacquired.
Khajan Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a person is entitled to an alternate plot only if their entire landholding is acquired, dismissing the petitioner's claim based on partial acquisition and government policy.
SURAJBHAN v. GOVT NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking allotment of an alternate plot, holding that entitlement arises only when the entire land is acquired, applying the Supreme Court precedent in Jai Singh Kanwar.
Azad Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a person whose entire landholding has not been acquired is not entitled to allotment of an alternate plot under the 1986 policy, affirming the Supreme Court precedent.