Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi II v. Shyam Spectra Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act as not maintainable, holding that appeals involving taxability issues lie exclusively before the Supreme Court under Section 35L.
Narender Gulia & Ors. v. The State N.C.T of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following a voluntary and amicable mediation settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
M/S SHREEHARI ANANTA OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ICD PATPARGANJ
The Delhi High Court moderated onerous security conditions imposed by Customs for provisional release of imported roasted areca nuts, directing reasonable bond and bank guarantee amounts consistent with the goods' value and use restrictions.
Aditya Chauhan & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the government to ensure information under the RTI Act is provided in electronic modes like email and pen drives, subject to safeguards, by framing appropriate rules or issuing directions.
Neelam Ranolia v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to appellants accused of disrupting Parliament with smoke canisters, holding their acts did not prima facie constitute terrorist acts under UAPA.
PACE DIGITEK PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging BSNL's rejection of the petitioners' techno-commercial bid for non-compliance and non-genuine documents, holding that BSNL acted within its rights and tender conditions.
Mahesh Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under IPC and POCSO where the victim, a major, had settled with the accused and the complainant withdrew prosecution, holding that continuing trial was not in the interest of justice.
Shiv Murat Dwivedi v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court upheld the attachment of properties under PMLA as proceeds of crime, holding that money laundering is a continuing offence covering properties acquired before registration of predicate offences if linked to ongoing criminal activity.
Gulshan Babbar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple writ petitions seeking court-monitored investigation into alleged financial fraud by IREO group, holding the petitioner lacked locus standi and the petitions were an abuse of process amid ongoing lawful investigations.
Vimlesh Andhiwal and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under sections 420, 468, 471, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties in a property dispute.
Mohan Lal & Ors. v. State of Not Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a genuine, voluntary settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing prevention of abuse of process.
Sh. Nitin & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, 354, and 34 IPC based on a genuine and voluntary settlement between matrimonial parties, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process of law.
Navneet Singh and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Zaid v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 316(4) BNS following an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the court's power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Soni and Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 115(2)/333/3(5) BNS and related IPC provisions following an amicable settlement between the parties, relying on its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Ms. Naina Harpalani v. Ravi Kumar
The Delhi High Court set aside a summary suit decree based on stale cheques not presented for encashment, holding that valid service of summons was effected by oral acceptance and directing the suit to be tried as an ordinary suit.
Neeraj Kumar Jolly v. Raghu Nathrakheja
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on bona-fide requirement grounds, affirming the landlord's discretion to choose tenancy termination and limiting revisional interference with Rent Controller's factual findings.
Madhurbhashani & Ors. v. Ranjit Singh
The Delhi High Court allowed eviction petitions by NRIs under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that bona fide requirement is a genuine need judged by the landlord and not negated by NRI status or premises size.
Lallubhai Amichand Limited v. Sunil Jagmohandas Shah
The Bombay High Court vacated an ex-parte order against a family company director, affirming the binding nature of a family arrangement governing management rights and restraining unlawful ouster attempts.
United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Atul Dattaray Wadhane
The Bombay High Court held the bus driver solely negligent in a motor accident, enhanced compensation for the claimant's 100% functional disability including future medical expenses with interest, and dismissed the insurer's appeal.