Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Raheja Developers Limited v. Ahluwalia Contractors India Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of a timely Section 34 petition to include a jurisdictional ground that the arbitral award was passed beyond the statutory period without court-approved extension, holding such legal grounds are not barred by limitation.
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited & Ors. v. Mr Siddhartha Mukherjee
The Delhi High Court set aside CIC's show cause notices under Section 20 of the RTI Act, holding that CIC exceeded its jurisdiction by adjudicating policy matters and penalizing PIOs for not furnishing information not maintained by the public authority.
Stumpp Schuele Lewis Machine Tools Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner’s bid in a defence tender, ruling that use of compatible ammunition by other bidders was permissible and judicial interference in the tender process was unwarranted.
Himanshu Verma v. Chandni Verma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order granting interim maintenance to a non-earning wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, emphasizing that capability to earn does not preclude maintenance entitlement.
Avient Switzerland GmbH v. Treadfast Ventures & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the trademark opposition for fresh adjudication, holding that the opponent must prove prior use by evidence and mere registration or pleadings are insufficient to refuse registration.
Major League Baseball Properties Inc v. Manish Vijay & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the respondent’s trademark 'BLUE-JAY' was adopted in bad faith and ordered its cancellation, affirming the petitioner’s superior prior user rights in the 'BLUE JAYS' mark.
Anita Sharma v. Naresh Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court decree dissolving marriage on grounds of cruelty, emphasizing that defamatory complaints to a spouse's employer constitute mental cruelty justifying divorce.
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki v. LMW LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff’s interim injunction application as the patent IN759 had expired, holding that no protection or injunction can be granted post-patent expiry under Section 53 of the Patents Act.
Communication Components Antenna Inc. v. Ace Technologies Corp. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed defendants to deposit 25% of claimed patent infringement damages as bank guarantee under its inherent powers to secure plaintiff’s claim amid limited Indian assets and lack of reciprocal enforcement abroad.
Sawhney Rubber Industries v. Workmen
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, affirming that a collective industrial dispute raised by a substantial group of workmen was validly espoused and that representative evidence sufficed to grant them claimed designations.
Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. v. Udai Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a police constable for prolonged unauthorized absence without prior leave sanction, emphasizing strict discipline in police service and rejecting the Tribunal's order of reinstatement.
Himani @ Monika Goyal v. Ashish Goyal
The Delhi High Court upheld a divorce decree on grounds of mental cruelty caused by the appellant's false criminal allegations, emphasizing the need for credible evidence in matrimonial disputes.
Sachin Kumar Daksh v. Mamta Gola & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order granting maintenance to the wife and minor child under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, rejecting the husband's appeal alleging concealment of income and improper maintenance assessment.
Roshan Real Estates Pvt Ltd v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court terminated the mandate of a court-appointed arbitrator due to statutory disqualification arising from a prior professional relationship with a party, emphasizing the necessity of impartiality under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Ram Kawar Garg v. Just Trade Securities Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside the time-barred appellate arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that prescribed timelines in NSE Bye-Laws and SEBI Circulars are mandatory and delay renders the arbitral tribunal functus officio.
National Highways Authority of India v. South Indian Bank Ltd and Union Bank of India Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award directing NHAI to deposit Termination Payment, holding that the Concession Agreement forms part of the Escrow and Substitution Agreements and that the Provisional Completion Certificate could not be kept in abeyance after issuance.
Belvedere Resources DMCC v. OCL Iron and Steel Ltd & Ors.
Delhi High Court dismissed Section 9 petition for interim security in arbitration dispute due to lack of territorial jurisdiction and absence of prima facie case for attachment of assets.
M/S VIVA INFRAVENTURE PVT. LTD. v. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of arbitrator's mandate for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the exclusive jurisdiction clause conferring jurisdiction on Gautam Budh Nagar courts prevails over the arbitrator's procedural order fixing Delhi as the seat of arbitration.
Amrit Pal Singh v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a PMLA money laundering case due to failure to satisfy statutory conditions, evasion of summons, and necessity of custodial interrogation.
Nimisha Bhagat v. Rashi Misra
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Article 227 to set aside the trial court's dismissal of a pre-trial amendment application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, emphasizing a liberal approach to amendments to determine real controversies and rejecting premature merit-based scrutiny.