Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sky Cable Industries & Anr. v. M/S KKM Overseas Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside a summary decree passed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC due to lack of clear admissions and remanded the matter for trial on disputed issues.
Samyak Jain v. Superintendent (Adjudication), Central GST Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand order involving fraudulent ITC, directing the petitioner to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act with condonation of limitation.
RSA Impex LLP v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to consider the petitioner's reply and grant a personal hearing, while leaving the validity of related GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
SBI General Insurance Company Limited v. Ganpat Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, upholding the Commissioner’s award based on unrebutted evidence establishing employer-employee relationship and emphasizing that appeals lie only on substantial questions of law.
Principal Commissioner of Customs (ACC Imports) v. Nokia India Sales Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CESTAT's decision allowing Nokia India's refund of customs duty based on a chartered accountant's certificate proving non-passing of duty incidence, setting aside the order directing refund amounts to the Consumer Welfare Fund.
BABA GLOBAL LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 29 & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that an Assessing Officer cannot review an order under Section 148A(d) and that a notice issued beyond the limitation period under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is invalid, quashing the impugned notice and order.
New Delhi Municipal Council v. Sunil Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of disciplinary proceedings against an employee accused of polygamy due to lack of sufficient evidence and procedural fairness, ordering reinstatement without back wages.
Arti Sharma v. GNCTD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that age relaxation for Anganwadi workers applies generally to all candidates including unreserved category applicants, and remanded the matter for reconsideration of the petitioner’s eligibility.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Central Plastics Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the Assessee satisfactorily explained share capital receipts under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act and that such receipts were not taxable income when received through banking channels from genuine investors.
Union of India & Ors. v. Sumit Mudgal
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing re-examination of a candidate declared medically unfit, emphasizing that medical boards must provide reasons when disregarding specialist opinions.
Narubiona Pranathi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate cannot be allowed to change her NEET (UG) category to PwD after the application and correction deadlines and after appearing in the exam under the non-PwD category.
Bhupender Kumar v. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging penalties for fraudulent ITC under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, holding that such penalties are valid if contemplated in the show cause notice and that writ jurisdiction is inappropriate for complex factual disputes in GST fraud cases.
Manju v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition acknowledging concurrent proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Randhir Jaiswal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's application under Rule 29 of the CRPF Rules, 1955 within four weeks, emphasizing timely administrative action and procedural fairness.
MS Fiberfill Engineers & Anr. v. MS Rampur Engineering Company Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that civil revision petitions and Article 227 petitions against interlocutory orders of Commercial Courts are barred by Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and such jurisdiction must be exercised sparingly to uphold legislative intent.
M/S TULIKA ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. v. M/S ALLIED TUBES PVT. LTD.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to allow additional documents in a commercial suit before framing of issues, dismissing the petition under Article 227 for lack of any gross illegality.
SURAJ KAPUR v. SUBODH GUPTA
The High Court upheld the Trial Court’s valuation of a suit for injunction reliefs and dismissed the petition challenging it, holding that valuation by the plaintiff must be accepted unless shown to be arbitrary or unreasonable.
UDAANSURE PRIVATE LIMITED v. MS SAPNA GOYAL
The High Court allowed the petitioner’s belated written statement to be taken on record with costs, emphasizing discretion to condone delay caused by unavoidable circumstances while ensuring expeditious trial.
Goodrich Maritime Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Rashvinz Exports
The High Court allowed the petitioner to examine an additional witness despite the witness not being listed, emphasizing fairness and the absence of objection from the respondent.
Vinod Kumar Sharma v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court granted limited interim protection restraining the bank from proceeding under the SARFAESI Act to enable the petitioner to file an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal once it became functional.