Mahesh Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi High Court · 02 Jul 2025 · 2025:DHC:5160
Girish Kathpalia
CRL.M.C.558/2025
2025:DHC:5160
criminal petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under IPC and POCSO where the victim, a major, had settled with the accused and the complainant withdrew prosecution, holding that continuing trial was not in the interest of justice.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C.558/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 02.07.2025
CRL.M.C. 558/2025, CRL.M.A. 2658/2025 CRL.M.A. 2657/2025
(stay) & CRL.M.A. 2659/2025 MAHESH KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Jitender Singh and Ms. Renuka Singh, Advocates.
VERSUS
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State
WITH
SI Jaspreet Pannu, PS Paharganj and SI Dharmendra Sharma, PS Patel
Nagar.
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)

1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.161/2019 of PS Patel Nagar for offence under Section 363/366/366A/376 IPC & Section 6 POCSO Act. The quashing is sought on the ground that the FIR was registered under wrong advice and now petitioner has settled the disputes with victim (respondent no.2).

2. Learned APP accepts notice for the State. Respondent no.2 (victim) present in Court with her mother and identified by Investigating Officer/SI Jaspreet Pannu also accepts notice.

KATHPALIA Date: 2025.07.02 18:38:49 +05'30'

3. It appears that the impugned FIR was registered on the basis of a missing complaint lodged by mother of the victim. Subsequently during investigation, it came out that the victim, aged 19 years had eloped with the petitioner as they were involved in a love affair and got married. According to prosecution, the victim was aged less than 18 years when she eloped whereas according to statement of victim recorded under Section 164 CrPC, she was aged 19 years and her age in the Aadhar Card was wrongly mentioned for the purposes of school admission.

4. I have spoken with the petitioner and respondent no.2 as well as her mother present in Court. It is submitted by them that now parents of respondent no.2 have also accepted marriage between petitioner and respondent no.2, who are living happily. Petitioner and respondent no.2 also now have two children. Mother of respondent no.2, on whose complaint the FIR was registered submits that she is happy with the relationship between petitioner and respondent no.2, so does not wish to pursue his prosecution.

5. Detailed statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. State has no objection to this petition, considering the peculiar facts of this case.

6. Considering the above circumstances, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through trial. Therefore, the petition is allowed and accordingly, FIR No.161/2019 of PS Patel Nagar for KATHPALIA Date: 2025.07.02 18:39:11 +05'30' offence under Section 363/366/366A/376 IPC & Section 6 POCSO Act and proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. Pending applications also stand disposed of.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) JULY 2, 2025 GIRISH KATHPALIA