Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rajesh Sharma v. Akhil Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to prioritize and expeditiously dispose of the petitioner’s pending application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC to protect his rights to perform religious duties.
Malik Traders v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to denial of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
Hari Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the Sentence Review Board’s rejection of premature release for a life convict, emphasizing the need for reasoned decisions considering reformative potential beyond the gravity of the offence.
R Archith Sai v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed a Review Medical Board to reassess the petitioner’s fitness for Navy Flying Branch appointment post-hernia surgery, with the decision to be binding on both parties.
Kishor Prabhakar Patwardhan v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that the period of an interim restraint order must be excluded from the limitation period under Section 23 of the Registration Act, allowing registration of documents presented after such restraint is lifted.
Kishor Prabhakar Patwardhan v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that the period of a court restraint order must be excluded from the limitation period under Section 23 of the Registration Act, allowing registration of documents presented after the statutory period due to bona fide delay.
Kamlesh Mishra v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 354-B and 506(II) IPC as the allegations were inherently improbable and motivated by malice, applying its inherent powers under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC.
Srinwati Mukherji v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a flat booked but not yet possessed does not qualify as a "Shared Household" under the DV Act, and relief directing payment of installments under Section 19 is not maintainable.
Ningbo Aux Imp & Exp Co. Ltd. v. Amstrad Consumer India Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act cannot be granted against a third party deleted from enforcement proceedings and against whom the foreign arbitral award is not enforceable.
Dilawar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed an application to correct its earlier order by recording the appearance of the respondents' Counsel, issuing a corrigendum to maintain accurate court records.
MR AJAY & ORS. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 377, 406, and 34 IPC on the basis of a mutual settlement and divorce by consent, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Sh Giri Nish Kumar alias Girnesh alias Bobby and Ors v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would be unfair and an abuse of process.
Rakesh Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, based on an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the principle that criminal cases can be ended in the interest of justice when disputes are resolved voluntarily.
Rajender Kumar Verma and Others v. Government of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related proceedings under IPC and SC/ST Act based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principles in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab.
Amritpal Singh & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the Court's inherent jurisdiction to prevent abuse of process of law.
Sagar Rajendra Kumar Mangla v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court grants a 7-month extension of license for operation of a railway catering stall accounting for Covid-19 closure period, affirming its jurisdiction and following precedents.
Conqueror Innovations Private Limited & Anr. v. Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction applications, holding that the defendant's 'Find Device' feature does not infringe the essential elements of the plaintiffs' registered patent and noting non-working and delay as additional factors.
Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Saroj Nagar
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order granting ex post facto approval of study leave to a government employee where the competent authority unduly delayed sanction despite timely application.
Rehan Ahmed Khan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the writ petition for fresh consideration of the applicability of a 2020 Office Memorandum on pension benefits for service prior to 2004.
Mangal Deep v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related notifications to the Supreme Court.