Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shri Ashok Gaur v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The High Court upheld the acquittal under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the accused successfully rebutted statutory presumptions by raising a probable defense and the complainant failed to prove the existence of debt.
Syed Danish Azeem v. Nazia Parveen @ Nazia & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s maintenance award to the wife and minor child, rejecting the husband’s belated claim of a second marriage and additional dependents due to deliberate concealment of material facts.
Surestha v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR involving physical abuse and electrocution of a minor child, holding that serious offences against children cannot be quashed merely on the basis of compromise.
Mili Debnath v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order against a petitioner shown only as a beneficiary in a fraud case, holding that mere receipt of money without evidence of involvement is insufficient to face trial.
K v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused from rape and sexual harassment charges due to unexplained delay, lack of corroborative evidence, and absence of grave suspicion at the charge framing stage.
Bansi Kumar v. State
The High Court acquitted the appellant of abduction and rape charges due to unreliable proof of prosecutrix's minority and contradictions in evidence, emphasizing the need for reliable age determination and voluntary statements under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
Mohd Arup v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a human trafficking and prostitution case, emphasizing his active role, victim identification, and absconding after interim bail.
Sheetal Suri; Dolly v. Sukhdev Singh; Raghubir Singh; Jasmine Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the partition suit for non-joinder of necessary parties and failure to prove key documents beyond pleadings, holding that all co-sharers must be parties for valid partition.
Yogesh Kumar Gupta v. Bobby Goreja
The Delhi High Court disposed of a possession dispute petition on the parties' amicable settlement, directing the petitioner to vacate the premises by a specified date under an affidavit undertaking.
Geeta Pal v. Badami Devi
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for mandatory injunction is maintainable upon revocation of a license for permissive use, and the trial court rightly refused to reject the plaint.
M/S SHINE TRAVELS AND CARGO PVT LTD v. SH.BAJRANGI PRASAD & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award holding the petitioner's termination of the workman illegal due to failure to prove proper notice and procedure.
Rajeev Jain & Anr. v. Gulshan Kumar Jain Through LR
The High Court held that striking off defence without issuing a mandatory show cause notice under Order XV-A(2) CPC violates natural justice and set aside the Trial Court's order accordingly.
India Biz Com v. Yokohoma India Pvt. Ltd.
The High Court held that while setting aside an ex parte decree, imposing the condition to deposit the entire decretal amount is onerous and reduced the security deposit to 10% of the suit amount.
N.K. Kantawala, Satyender Chahar, A.M. Nair & Nimish v. Raghav Goel & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed appointment of a scientific expert to determine the age of a disputed partition wall in a civil injunction suit, facilitating fact-finding without delaying trial proceedings.
Shyam Sunder Khandelwal v. Kishori Lal Jaiswal
The Delhi High Court held that execution proceedings can continue during the pendency of a Regular First Appeal in absence of a stay order, dismissing the petition challenging the execution order.
OM SAI RAM CATERING v. INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking COVID-19 related license extension beyond agreed contractual terms, holding the Novation Agreement and arbitration clause binding and the Policy Letter inapplicable.
Aruna Kumar v. Atmaram Sanatan Dharma College
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking enhancement of subsistence allowance during suspension, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to increased allowance as the suspension was prolonged due to her own conduct.
Shri Satish Kumar Sakuja v. M/s. Appolo Cranes Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed defendants to deposit disputed advance payments conditionally, finding their defence improbable but possible, thus refusing summary judgment but facilitating expeditious resolution under Order XIII-A CPC.
Rahul Kumar Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder under Section 302 IPC due to delayed arrest, failure of eyewitness identification, prolonged trial, and good conduct during incarceration, subject to stringent conditions.
N B Footcare v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to improper communication of the Show Cause Notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair hearing, while leaving the validity of related notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.