Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Indo Asian Ltd. v. State of Uttrakhand & Anr.

21 Jan 2014 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing criminal proceedings under Section 406 IPC at the threshold and allowed the trial to proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 406 IPC Section 482 CrPC criminal breach of trust quashing of FIR

M.D. Jacob v. United India Insurance Ltd.

21 Jan 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court restored the full compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal to a 100% disabled accident victim, setting aside the High Court's unjustified reduction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of future earnings permanent disability

Viplav Sharma v. Union of India

21 Jan 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court directed the UGC to independently examine all reports and objections before advising the Central Government on the de-notification of 44 Deemed Universities, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures under the UGC Act.

administrative other Significant Deemed University University Grants Commission Act Section 3 UGC Act Prof. Tandon Committee

Perumal v. Janaki

20 Jan 2014 · P. Sathasivam; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that while private complaints under section 190 Cr.P.C. are barred for offences under section 193 IPC by virtue of section 195 Cr.P.C., High Courts have jurisdiction and obligation to initiate proceedings suo moto or on application to prevent malafide prosecution and maintain judicial integrity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 195 Cr.P.C. Section 193 IPC Section 211 IPC Charge-sheet

State of Haryana v. Bharti Teletech Ltd.

20 Jan 2014 · H.L. Dattu; Dipak Misra; S.A. Bobde
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that production levels for sales tax exemption must be maintained unit-wise and disallowed clubbing production of expansion units, restoring the tax recovery order against Bharti Teletech Ltd.

tax appeal_allowed Significant sales tax exemption Haryana General Sales Tax Rules 1975 Rule 28A(11)(a)(i) production level condition

Joshinder Yadav v. State of Bihar

20 Jan 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for dowry-related cruelty and murder based on circumstantial evidence and failure to discharge the burden under Section 106 of the Evidence Act despite absence of viscera report.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry harassment cruelty murder circumstantial evidence

Dilbagh Singh v. State of Uttaranchal

17 Jan 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC but reduced the sentence considering weak evidence on participation and the nature of injuries.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 34 IPC quantum of sentence common intention

Ram Kishan v. Sh. Tarun Bajaj & Ors.

17 Jan 2014 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court dismissed the contempt petition for failure to prove wilful disobedience in denying the applicant benefits of a higher post not explicitly directed by the court.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court wilful disobedience back wages reinstatement

Km. Hema Mishra v. State of U.P.

16 Jan 2014 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of omitting Section 438 CrPC in Uttar Pradesh and held that High Courts may grant pre-arrest protection under Article 226 only sparingly in exceptional cases, dismissing the appellant's plea to quash the FIR and grant anticipatory bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Article 226 Section 438 CrPC omission pre-arrest protection

Varinder Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.

16 Jan 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR against a visitor for carrying a mobile phone into prison, holding no offence was made out under the Prisons Act as the phone was not a prohibited article at the time.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prisons Act, 1894 Section 42 Prisons Act Section 45 Prisons Act Section 52-A Prisons Act

Parminder alias Ladka Pola v. State of Delhi

16 Jan 2014 · A. K. Patnaik; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and minimum sentence for rape under Section 376 IPC, holding that slight penetration suffices for rape and that no adequate and special reasons existed to reduce the mandatory minimum sentence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC minimum sentence proviso to Section 376(1)

SH Medical Centre Hospital v. State of Kerala

16 Jan 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda · 2014 (2) KLT 139

The Supreme Court held that only the portion of a hospital building used for free medical aid qualifies for building tax exemption under the Kerala Building Tax Act, rejecting exemption claims based on nominal charges to paying patients.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant building tax exemption charitable institution Kerala Building Tax Act 1975 free medical aid

Executive Engineer, Road Development Division No.III, Panvel v. Atlanta Limited

16 Jan 2014 · A. K. Patnaik; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that when both the High Court and District Court have jurisdiction over an arbitration dispute, the High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction at the seat of arbitration is the appropriate forum, and upheld the transfer of proceedings accordingly.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 2(1)(e) Section 34 Arbitration Act Section 42 Arbitration Act

Syed Sadiq v. Divisional Manager, United India Ins. Co.

16 Jan 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in motor accident claims by assessing actual loss of earning capacity, rejected contributory negligence without evidence, and affirmed interest and litigation costs for appellants engaged in unorganized sector occupations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation permanent disability loss of earning capacity

Peter Kerkar v. Special Director of Enforcement

16 Jan 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that transactions of foreign currency between licensed Full Fledged Money Changers through authorized representatives do not violate FERA provisions, setting aside penalties imposed for alleged contraventions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Full Fledged Money Changers Authorized representatives Penalty under FERA

Union of India & Ors. v. Tilak Raj Gandhi

15 Jan 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that a candidate denied appointment due to a pending inquiry and who failed to apply afresh has no right to appointment without participating in a fresh, fair selection process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant appointment Director Finance BSNL Central Administrative Tribunal

State of Rajasthan v. Roshan Khan & Ors.

15 Jan 2014 · A. K. Patnaik; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court restored the conviction for gang rape under Sections 366 and 376(2)(g) IPC, holding that the prosecutrix's testimony, corroborated by medical and forensic evidence and the presumption under Section 114A of the Indian Evidence Act, sufficed to prove absence of consent and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant gang rape Section 376(2)(g) IPC Section 114A Indian Evidence Act presumption of absence of consent

Haryana Dairy Development Cooperative Federation Limited v. Jagdish Lal

13 Jan 2014 · B. S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court dismissed a petition involving a trivial money recovery claim under Rs. 25,000/- emphasizing judicial economy and directed personal accountability for unnecessary litigation expenses.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 102 CPC money recovery suit petty claims judicial economy

Saroj v. Sunder Singh

10 Jan 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that a natural guardian cannot sell a minor's immovable property without prior court permission, and such sale deeds are voidable at the minor's instance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 Section 8 natural guardian minor's property

State of U.P. Thr. Exe. Engineer & Anr. v. Amar Nath Yadav

10 Jan 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a 481-day delay, holding that procedural delays within government departments do not justify condonation without a plausible explanation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Special Leave Petition government departments law of limitation