Supreme Court of India

16,876 judgments

Year:

Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. State of Tamil Nadu

06 Jan 2014 · B. S. Chauhan; S. A. Bobde
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the Podhu Dikshitars' fundamental right under Article 26 to administer the Sri Sabhanayagar Temple, held that the earlier High Court judgment operates as res judicata, and invalidated the appointment of an Executive Officer without prescribed rules under the Act 1959.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 26 Constitution of India religious denomination administration of temple res judicata

Shivshankar Gurgar v. Dilip

03 Jan 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; J. Chelameswar

Sandeep Thapar v. SME Technologies Private Limited

02 Jan 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

Saberabibi Yakubbhai Shaikh & Ors. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.

02 Jan 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

Ravi Prakash Singh @ Arvind Singh v. State of Bihar

24 Dec 2013 · Prafulla C. Pant; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that filing the charge sheet on the ninetieth day complies with Section 167(2) CrPC, and the accused is not entitled to bail if the charge sheet is filed within the statutory period.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 167(2) CrPC charge sheet filing bail entitlement period of ninety days

Collector of Land Acquisition v. M/S Andaman Timber Industries

28 Nov 2013 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a perpetual license under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Regulation confers an interest in land entitling the licensee to compensation upon acquisition, and dismissed the review petition challenging this principle.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition licensee interest Andaman and Nicobar Islands Land Revenue and Land Reforms Regulation, 1966 Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Ashvinbhai Jayantilal Modi v. Ramkaran Ramchandra Sharma & Anr.

18 Jun 2013 · V. Gopala Gowda; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by realistically assessing future income of a deceased medical student, applying Sarla Verma multiplier based on parents' age, and setting aside contributory negligence attributed to the deceased.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation future income loss of dependency

Registrar of Co-operative Societies v. T.K. Kunhiraman

09 May 2013 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the interim status quo in a Cooperative Society membership dispute and directed the High Court to expeditiously dispose of the related writ petition without being influenced by prior observations.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural Cooperative Society enrollment of members expulsion of members status quo

M/S. SHIV STEELS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

17 Dec 2012 · J.B. PARDIWALA; SANDEEP MEHTA · 2025 INSC 1126
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court held that reassessments under Section 21 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 are invalid if earlier assessments were time-barred under Section 19, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation provisions in tax law.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 Section 19 limitation Section 21 sanction time-barred assessment

Arikala Narasa Reddy v. Venkata Ram Reddy Reddygari

20 Jul 2012 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar; M. Y. Eqbal

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY v. U. DINAKAR

30 May 2012 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph

Ramesh Chand v. Suresh Chand

09 Apr 2012 · Aravind Kumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1059
Cites 0 · Cited by 16

The Supreme Court held that an Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, and Will do not confer title without a registered sale deed and proper proof, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for possession and protecting the bona fide purchaser's rights.

property appeal_allowed Significant Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 54 Section 53A Agreement to Sell

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Mahendra Alias Golu

08 Oct 2011 · Surya Kant; Hima Kohli
Cites 0 · Cited by 34

The Supreme Court held that the respondent's acts went beyond mere preparation and constituted an attempt to commit rape under Section 376(2)(f) read with Section 511 IPC, restoring his conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant attempt to commit rape preparation vs attempt Section 376 IPC Section 511 IPC

Jayaswamy v. State of Karnataka

12 Aug 2011 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; L. Nageswara Rao
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for causing grievous hurt but set aside his murder conviction, emphasizing that appellate courts should not disturb acquittals without substantial and compelling reasons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant acquittal appellate interference common intention grievous hurt

M/S NORTH EASTERN CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. v. M/S ASHOK PAPER MILL (ASSAM) LTD.

21 Jul 2011 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 1059
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that appeals under the Jogighopa Act are not governed by Article 116 of the Limitation Act, and in absence of prescribed limitation, appeals must be filed within reasonable time, allowing the delayed appeal filed by the appellant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Article 116 Jogighopa Act, 1990 Commissioner of Payments