Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Ram Kishan Fauji v. State of Haryana and Ors.

21 Mar 2017 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar · 2017 INSC 238

Ram Kishan Fauji v. State of Haryana and Ors.

21 Mar 2017 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

Administration v. M/s Iron Master India (P) Ltd.

07 Mar 2017 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre · 2017 INSC 204

Kameng Dolo v. Atum Welly

08 Feb 2017 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar

Kameng Dolo v. Atum Welly

08 Feb 2017 · Dipak Misra; A. M. Khanwilkar

T.P. Gopalakrishnan v. State of Kerala

30 Jan 2017 · B.V. Nagarathna; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court quashed the appellant's conviction for misappropriation on grounds of double jeopardy and lack of prior State Government consent, setting aside the trial court and High Court judgments.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant double jeopardy Article 20(2) Constitution of India Section 300 CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act

efd313f2d1ab5ee6875b91155fba7a4894f16893db0ad69f7e36afc4372021ea

19 Jan 2017 · Rohinton Fali Nariman; K. M. Joseph; Ajay Rastogi · 2019 INSC 1362
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal directing admission of meritorious candidates denied entry due to procedural irregularities, emphasizing timely judicial intervention and procedural fairness.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Admission MBBS course Administrative decision Procedural irregularity

P. S. Krishna v. Andhra Pradesh State & R.

19 Jan 2017 · Rohinton Fali Nariman; K. M. Joseph; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that meritorious candidates wrongfully denied MBBS admission and who approach court timely are entitled to relief including admission beyond cutoff dates in exceptional cases, laying down detailed guidelines for such admissions.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant MBBS admission illegal denial of admission meritorious candidate court relief

M/S PATEL BROTHERS v. STATE OF ASSAM

04 Jan 2017 · A. K. Sikri; Abhay Manohar Sapre

Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit v. Dr. Manu

01 Jan 2017 · K. M. Joseph; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that a 2001 Government Order amending advance increment benefits for Ph.D. holders is a substantive amendment not applicable retrospectively, entitling lecturers placed in selection grade before that date to full increments under the 1999 order.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant advance increments Ph.D. qualification Government Order 1999 Government Order 2001

Swaraj Abhiyan v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Dec 2016 · Madan B. Lokur; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court directed States to faithfully implement the National Food Security Act, 2013, emphasizing the constitutional obligation under Article 256 and issuing detailed directions to ensure functional grievance redressal, State Food Commissions, social audits, and Vigilance Committees.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant National Food Security Act, 2013 Article 256 Constitution State Food Commission District Grievance Redressal Officer

Ningappa Thotappa Angadi v. Special Land Acquisition Officer

11 Nov 2016 · S.A. BOBDE; B.R. GAVAI; SURYA KANT

The Supreme Court restored enhanced land acquisition compensation to a delayed appellant on parity grounds but denied interest for the delay period.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation delay in filing appeal equitable treatment