Supreme Court of India

18,587 judgments

Year:

Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker

13 Jul 2016 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that the Governor's preponement of the Arunachal Pradesh Assembly session without proper aid and advice was unconstitutional, and the acceptance of MLAs' resignations without inquiry was invalid, emphasizing adherence to constitutional procedures.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Governor's power Summoning Assembly Preponement of session Resignation of MLAs

V. Vasanthakumar v. H.C. Bhatia and Ors.

13 Jul 2016 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court referred to a Constitution Bench key questions on judicial reforms, including establishing Regional Courts of Appeal, to address backlog and restore its role as a Constitutional Court.

constitutional other Significant Article 136 of Constitution Supreme Court jurisdiction Special Leave Petition Judicial reforms

Mulin Sharma v. State of Assam

12 Jul 2016 · J. Chelameswar; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that a resignation obtained under compulsion is invalid but back wages are discretionary and denied in absence of proof of unemployment, reinstating the appellant with compensation for wrongful denial of employment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant forced resignation back wages reinstatement discretionary relief

R R PAREKH v. HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT & ANR.

12 Jul 2016 · T S Thakur; Dr D Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court upheld misconduct findings against a judicial officer for awarding sentences below statutory minimum without reasons but modified dismissal to compulsory retirement, affirming High Court's disciplinary jurisdiction and principles of judicial accountability.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary inquiry judicial misconduct sentencing below statutory minimum Section 135 Customs Act

State of Maharashtra v. Anita

12 Jul 2016 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that appointments to 471 posts created on a contractual basis by the State of Maharashtra were validly contractual, not permanent, and the appointees cannot claim regularization or permanency.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant contractual appointment permanency government resolution Articles 14 and 16

Talaulicar & Sons P. Ltd. v. Union of India

12 Jul 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Uday Umesh La...

The Supreme Court set aside the extension of environmental clearance granted without due procedure, directing fresh consideration with public consultation, holding that mining without valid clearance is illegal.

environmental_law appeal_allowed Significant environmental clearance EIA Notification 1994 environmental clearance validity mining operations

State of Jharkhand v. M/S CWE-SOMA Consortium

12 Jul 2016 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the State's right to cancel a tender due to lack of competition caused by restrictive specifications, setting aside the High Court's order directing opening of the single responsive bid.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Tender cancellation Central Vigilance Commission Guidelines Clause 4.17 Clause 4.18(d)

EXEC.ENGINEER, KUKADI P.L.D.DIV.& ANR. v. BHAGA PRABHU BHOSALE

12 Jul 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

The Supreme Court declined to interfere with an interim order passed by the Bombay High Court in a pending writ petition and directed expeditious disposal of the writ petition.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural interim order writ petition judicial restraint expeditious disposal

State of Gujarat v. Jayrajbhai Punjabhai Varu

11 Jul 2016 · Kurian Joseph; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused, holding that the dying declarations recorded by independent authorities were more reliable than the oral dying declaration to the deceased's father, and conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated oral testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC burn injuries dying declaration reliability

Securities and Exchange Board of India v. M/s. Opee Stock-Link Ltd. & Anr

11 Jul 2016 · Anil R. Dave; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld SEBI's penalty orders against respondents for illegally cornering IPO shares through benami demat accounts and off-market transactions, setting aside the SAT's contrary order.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant SEBI Act, 1992 IPO irregularities Retail Individual Investors benami demat accounts

Krushna Narayan Wanjari v. The Jai Bharti Shikshan Sanstha

08 Jul 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court restored the Industrial Tribunal's award of back wages to the petitioner, holding that the High Court erred in interfering and that the State is liable to pay in a 100% grant-in-aid institution.

labor appeal_allowed Significant back wages Industrial Tribunal High Court interference Article 226

AL ISMAIL HAJ TOUR v. UNION OF INDIA

08 Jul 2016 · Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that PTOs registered under the Approved Policy for Haj 2013-2017 need not submit proof of payments annually under stipulation (vii), and once registered, remain qualified unless validly disqualified.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Private Tour Operators Haj quota Approved Policy 2013-2017 stipulation (vii)

Meghashyam Sadashivrao Vadhave v. State of Maharashtra

08 Jul 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court enhanced the compensation awarded by the High Court from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 with interest from 1986 in case of delay, holding the State liable to pay and officers personally responsible for delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation enhancement of compensation interest on delayed payment personal liability

Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association v. Union of India

08 Jul 2016 · Madan B. Lokur; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 32 seeking investigation into alleged fake encounters in Manipur, emphasizing the fundamental right to truth and justice for victims' families and the constitutional limits on armed forces' powers under AFSPA.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant extra-judicial executions fake encounters Article 32 AFSPA

Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap v. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap

08 Jul 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a divorce case from Mumbai to Barshi considering the appellant's residence, related pending cases, and comparative hardship.

family appeal_allowed Significant case transfer divorce family court comparative hardship

Mukhtiar Singh v. State of Punjab

05 Jul 2016 · J. Chelameswar; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a Revenue Patwari for accepting illegal gratification, affirming that demand and acceptance of bribe supported by credible evidence and statutory presumption under the Prevention of Corruption Act suffice for conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 illegal gratification demand and acceptance phenolphthalein test

Shyam Lal v. Deepa Dass Chela Ram Chela Garib Dass

05 Jul 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Arun Mishra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a tenant continuing in possession after expiry of a fixed term agricultural lease with landlord's consent retains tenant status under the Punjab Security of Land Tenure Act, 1953 and is entitled to statutory protection from eviction.

property appeal_allowed Significant Punjab Security of Land Tenure Act, 1953 tenant holding over fixed term lease eviction procedure

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Tarini Infrastructure Ltd.

05 Jul 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that tariffs fixed under PPAs by the State Electricity Regulatory Commission are subject to statutory review and modification, rejecting the notion that such tariffs are inviolable contractual terms.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Power Purchase Agreement Tariff fixation State Electricity Regulatory Commission

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOCHI v. TRANS ASIAN SHIPPING SERVICES (P) LTD

05 Jul 2016 · T.S. Thakur; A.K. Sikri; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that income from slot charter arrangements qualifies as deemed tonnage income under the Tonnage Tax Scheme and can be included in tonnage income computation without requiring valid certificates for the ships involved.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Tonnage Tax Scheme Income Tax Act 1961 Chapter XIIG slot charter

Ajay Gupta v. Raju @ Rajendra Singh Yadav

05 Jul 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that filing a suit after the limitation period on a non-working Saturday when the court registry is open does not extend limitation under the Limitation Act, and dismissed the suit as time-barred.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Section 4 Limitation Act Section 5 Limitation Act Order 7 Rule 11 CPC