Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

State of Kerala v. P. Muhammed Noushad

29 Jun 2016 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of a Village Officer accused of accepting bribe under the Prevention of Corruption Act, holding that the prosecution failed to prove the essential facts beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act trap and recovery appreciation of evidence benefit of doubt

Committee of Management Anuragi Devi Degree College & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Anr.

29 Jun 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the mandatory time schedule for affiliation under the NCTE Act and dismissed the appeal of a college seeking extension of affiliation beyond the prescribed cut-off date, emphasizing adherence to statutory norms and prohibiting admission without valid affiliation.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant affiliation recognition NCTE Act, 1993 time schedule

Jagdish v. State of Haryana

29 Jun 2016 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for causing death by lathi blows based on credible eyewitness evidence and concurrent findings of lower courts, dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 304 Part II IPC Section 323 IPC concurrent findings eyewitness testimony

Jagat Singh v. State of Uttarakhand

29 Jun 2016 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under the NDPS Act, holding that compliance with Sections 42 and 50 was satisfied by the presence of a Gazetted Officer during recovery and that minor procedural lapses did not vitiate the prosecution case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 42 NDPS Section 50 NDPS search and seizure

Praful Sudhakar Parab v. State of Maharashtra

29 Jun 2016 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld a murder conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and last seen theory despite absence of motive and direct eyewitnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory murder conviction absence of motive

S. SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED v. NOORJAHAN BEEVI

29 Jun 2016 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that in a hire purchase agreement with ipso facto termination on default, the limitation period for recovery suit begins from the date of default, dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant hire purchase agreement limitation period Article 55 Limitation Act default in payment

M/S. EMM ENN ASSOCIATES v. COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEER

26 Jun 2016 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that a claim not evidently barred by limitation and involving disputed issues is a live claim that must be referred to arbitration, setting aside the High Court's rejection of the appellant's application for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration Act live claim dead claim limitation

Dr. Rini Johar & Anr. v. State of M.P. & Ors.

03 Jun 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held the petitioners' arrest illegal for non-compliance with procedural safeguards, quashed the criminal proceedings, and awarded compensation for violation of their fundamental rights.

criminal petition_allowed Significant illegal arrest procedural safeguards Section 41 CrPC Section 41-A CrPC

Satish Shetty v. State of Karnataka

03 Jun 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a husband for cruelty and abetment of his wife's suicide under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC, affirming the High Court's interference with a perverse acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry harassment abetment of suicide Section 498-A IPC Section 306 IPC

Indira Devi and Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh

03 Jun 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court acquitted three lady appellants of charges under Section 149 IPC due to contradictions in victim's testimony and lack of corroborative medical evidence, emphasizing careful scrutiny of injured witness statements and the necessity of proving common object for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 149 IPC injured witness common object contradictory evidence

Sarla Performance Fibers Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise

03 Jun 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that excise duty on goods cleared by a 100% EOU without permission is leviable under main Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, not under the proviso, overruling the contrary tribunal decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant 100% Export Oriented Unit Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 3(1) proviso to Section 3(1)

Bijender @ Papu and Anr. v. State of Haryana

03 Jun 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court reduced the sentence of appellants under Section 325 read with Section 149 IPC from five to three years imprisonment, rejecting parity with older co-accused but moderating punishment due to lack of specific attribution of grievous injury.

criminal sentence_modified Significant parity in sentencing Section 325 IPC Section 149 IPC rigorous imprisonment

Bhagwan Sahai and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan

03 Jun 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants on the ground that prosecution failed to explain injuries on accused side and death of their father, entitling them to benefit of doubt and right of private defence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant right of private defence benefit of doubt injuries on accused side free fight

STAR SPORTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. PRASAR BHARATI

27 May 2016 · A.K. Sikri; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that broadcasters must share live sports broadcasting signals with Prasar Bharati free of all advertisements, including sponsor logos embedded by event organizers, under the Sports Broadcasting Signals Act, 2007.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Sports Broadcasting Signals Act 2007 Prasar Bharati mandatory sharing live broadcasting signals

Pragna Paramita Praharaj v. State of Orissa

20 May 2016 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court granted bail to a convicted appellant during the pendency of her appeal, setting aside the High Court's refusal of bail in a murder case.

criminal appeal_allowed bail pending appeal life imprisonment murder conviction discretionary bail

Nirmal Dass v. State of Punjab

18 May 2016 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court reduced the appellant's sentence from two years to one year rigorous imprisonment for offences involving fraudulent manipulation of land records, considering his advanced age and other mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quantum of sentence manipulation of revenue records Sections 465, 468, 471 IPC Section 120-B IPC

Land Acquisition Officer, A.P v. Ravi Santosh Reddy by L.Rs

18 May 2016 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal challenging the refusal to recall an unchallenged execution order directing payment of interest on delayed land acquisition compensation, affirming the finality of such orders.

civil appeal_dismissed Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation execution petition order recall

Subhan Tours & Travel Services v. Union of India

18 May 2016 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court disposed of writ petitions by directing petitioners to file fresh applications for Hajj tour permissions, which authorities must decide on merits with reasoned orders, refusing preemptive relief based on apprehension.

administrative petition_dismissed Hajj tour operators Private Tour Operators (PTO) Mandamus Article 32 Constitution of India

CHAMOLI DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. THROUGH ITS SECRETARY/MAHAPRANDHAK & ANR v. RAGHUNATH SINGH RANA & ORS

17 May 2016 · Ashok Bhushan; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of an employee's dismissal for non-compliance with mandatory disciplinary inquiry procedures and principles of natural justice under statutory regulations.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary inquiry natural justice charge sheet dismissal from service

State of Rajasthan v. Firoz Khan @ Arif Khan

17 May 2016 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Ashok Bhushan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's unreasoned dismissal of leave to appeal against acquittal and remanded the case for fresh consideration in accordance with established legal standards.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 378(3) CrPC leave to appeal order of acquittal non-application of mind