Supreme Court of India

18,587 judgments

Year:

Subraya M.N. v. Vittala M.N. & Ors.

05 Jul 2016 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, holding that plaintiffs relinquished rights in two properties by family settlement but all parties share equally in the third property granted by patta to the appellant.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant family settlement partition suit relinquishment of property rights registration of documents

Sai Bhaskar Iron Ltd. v. A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission

05 Jul 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission’s fuel surcharge formula including cost components beyond fuel cost and dismissed challenges to the exclusion of agricultural consumption until metering is complete.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Fuel Surcharge Adjustment Electricity Regulatory Commission Tariff fixation Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998

Sudhakaran v. Corp. of Trivandrum & Anr.

05 Jul 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that landlord consent under Section 492(3) Kerala Municipality Act is required only for first-time licence applications and not for renewals during valid tenancy, protecting statutory tenants from eviction by withholding consent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 492(3) Kerala Municipality Act landlord consent licence renewal statutory tenant

Surinderjit Singh Mand v. State of Punjab

05 Jul 2016 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Sanction under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory before prosecuting public servants for offences committed while acting in official capacity, and cognizance under Section 319 CrPC does not dispense with this requirement.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 197 CrPC sanction for prosecution public servant acting in discharge of official duty

Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Jul 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held the Railway Administration liable for a fatal train accident caused by structural infringements and passengers traveling on the roof, directing compensation and systemic safety reforms.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Railway Administration liability duty of care train accident roof travelers

Mahipal Singh Rana v. State of Uttar Pradesh

05 Jul 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the criminal contempt conviction of an advocate for intimidating a judge, clarified the courts' supervisory power to restrain advocates from appearing until purging contempt, and emphasized the Bar Council's exclusive disciplinary jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal contempt advocate misconduct Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Advocates Act, 1961

NHPC Ltd. v. M/s Jai Prakash Associates Ltd.

04 Jul 2016 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court corrected a typographical error in the interest rates awarded by the High Court, restoring the original rates fixed by the Arbitral Tribunal in a contract dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitral Award Interest Rate Typographical Error Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Anita International v. Tungabadra Sugar Works Mazdoor Sangh; Official Liquidator

04 Jul 2016 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Company Court has supervisory jurisdiction over sales of assets in company liquidation, requiring association of the Official Liquidator, and set aside an auction sale confirmed by the Recovery Officer for procedural irregularities and violation of a binding court order.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Debts Recovery Tribunal Company Court jurisdiction Official Liquidator

U. Subhadramma & Ors. v. State of A.P.

04 Jul 2016 · S. A. Bobde; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that property of a deceased accused cannot be attached under the Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance, 1944 in absence of a valid conviction, as criminal trial abates on death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance, 1944 attachment of property death of accused abatement of trial

R. K. Roja v. U. S. Rayudu

04 Jul 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC must be decided before trial proceeds and set aside the High Court's order postponing its consideration, while rejecting the application on merits and allowing the appellant to file a written statement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Election Petition Application for rejection Procedural irregularity

Gurjant Singh v. State of Punjab

01 Jul 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the High Court's remittance of industrial dispute references, upheld the Industrial Tribunal's awards of reinstatement without back wages, and allowed the Tribunal to proceed despite pendency of Supreme Court proceedings.

labor appeal_dismissed Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Labour Court Industrial Tribunal reinstatement

Mumtaz Muntyaz v. State of U.P. (Now Uttarakhand)

01 Jul 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of one appellant while setting aside the sentence of another found to be a juvenile at the time of the offence, remitting his case to the Juvenile Justice Board for appropriate sentencing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration juvenile justice Section 302 IPC Section 20 Juvenile Justice Act

Sarva Shramik Sanghatana v. M/s. Interim International Removals

01 Jul 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's stay of an interim wage increase by the Industrial Tribunal and directed expeditious disposal of the pending labor reference.

labor appeal_dismissed Industrial Tribunal interim order wage increase stay

Harijan Paniben Dudabhai v. State of Gujarat

01 Jul 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that employees appointed by Gram Panchayats before recruitment rules were framed, who served continuously and received regular salary, are entitled to family pension and gratuity under the Gujarat Panchayats Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Panchayat Service family pension gratuity appointment validity

B.S.N.L. v. Pawan Kumar Shukla

01 Jul 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court awarded lump sum compensation to daily wage workers engaged by BSNL for a completed project and directed preference in future employment, while dismissing an appeal concerning a long-serving driver.

labor appeal_allowed Significant daily wage workers lump sum compensation preference in employment BSNL

Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Others v. Union of India & Others

30 Jun 2016 · Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that statutory reservation for persons with disabilities applies to all identified posts irrespective of recruitment mode, overruling the application of Indra Sawhney's prohibition on reservation in promotions to PWD.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant persons with disabilities reservation promotion Persons with Disabilities Act 1995

SANJIVKUMAR SURAJPRAKASH AGGARWAL v. STATE BANK OF INDIA

30 Jun 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court directed a Magistrate to conduct a proper inquiry into the genuineness of a tenancy under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, holding that prior cursory consideration was insufficient adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant tenancy sham tenancy SARFAESI Act Section 14

Maheshwar Peri & Others v. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

30 Jun 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that suo motu contempt proceedings by a High Court must be initiated within one year of the alleged contempt, and initiation after this period is barred by limitation under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant contempt of court limitation period suo motu proceedings Article 215 Constitution of India

Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Vigilance) v. M/s Hindustan Lever Limited

30 Jun 2016 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that statutory inclusion of tax in maximum retail price does not amount to collection of sales tax, affirming the exemption benefit to a new industrial unit under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant sales tax exemption Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 tax collection maximum retail price

Union of India v. Diler Singh

30 Jun 2016 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that dismissal is a valid punishment under Section 11(1) of the CRPF Act and set aside the High Court's judgment that had declared the dismissal illegal and disproportionate.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 Section 11(1) disciplinary authority dismissal from service