Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Adiveppa & Ors v. Bhimappa & Anr.

06 Sep 2017 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal upholding the lower courts' concurrent findings that the plaintiffs failed to prove self-acquisition of properties and that the ancestral properties had been validly partitioned.

civil appeal_dismissed concurrent findings of fact self-acquired property ancestral property oral partition

Rajbir v. State of Haryana

06 Sep 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi · 2017 INSC 863

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's compensation award for KMP Project land acquisition, ruling that valuation must be based on the notification date without reliance on subsequent acquisitions or belting system, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation Section 4(1) Notification belting system

Rajbir v. State of Haryana

06 Sep 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's compensation award for land acquired for the KMP Expressway, holding that valuation must be based on the market value as of the acquisition date without reliance on subsequent acquisitions or belting system reductions.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation Section 4(1) Notification belting system

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Sandeep Kumar Jain

05 Sep 2017 · Arun Mishra; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of private bus permits on a notified route under the Motor Vehicles Act, affirming that private operators cannot ply vehicles on such routes without scheme authorization.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant notified route motor vehicles act permit cancellation state transport authority

M/s Raptakos, Brett & Co. Ltd v. M/s Ganesh Property

05 Sep 2017 · R.K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi · 2017 INSC 857

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent suit for mesne profits is barred under Order II Rule 2 CPC if the claim was relinquished in earlier proceedings, allowing the appellant's appeal and dismissing the respondent's suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mesne profits res judicata Order II Rule 2 CPC lease termination

M/s Raptakos, Brett & Co. Ltd v. M/s Ganesh Property

05 Sep 2017 · R.K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that a landlord who relinquished mesne profits claim in an earlier suit cannot maintain a subsequent suit for the same mesne profits, applying Order II Rule 2 CPC and estoppel principles.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mesne profits Order II Rule 2 CPC res judicata issue estoppel

Siddalingayya v. Gurulingappa

05 Sep 2017 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's remand of a civil suit for fresh trial after the Trial Court denied defendants reasonable opportunity to file written statement, emphasizing procedural flexibility and natural justice.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant written statement natural justice procedure remand

Harbanslal Malhotra & Sons Pvt.Ltd. v. Kolkata Municipal Corpn.

05 Sep 2017 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that for municipal tax assessment under the Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, a building and its appurtenant land must be assessed as a single unit under Section 174(1), rejecting the High Court's direction for separate assessment.

tax appeal_allowed Significant annual valuation Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 Section 174 Section 178

State of Kerala v. Jossy Sequeria

05 Sep 2017 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of a confiscation order under Section 61-A of the Kerala Forest Act, holding that confiscation is unjustified without proof that seized forest produce is government property within the State.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Kerala Forest Act, 1961 Section 61-A confiscation forest produce

Varala Bharath Kumar and another v. State of Telangana and another

05 Sep 2017 · Arun Mishra; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and 406 IPC where allegations did not prima facie disclose offences, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings

World College of Medical Sciences & Research and Hospital v. Union of India

05 Sep 2017 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court upheld the debarring of a medical college due to significant deficiencies but directed a fresh inspection and allowed continuation of studies for admitted students, emphasizing reasoned consideration of all relevant materials by the Competent Authority.

administrative other Significant Medical College Permission Medical Council of India Oversight Committee Inspection Report

World College of Medical Sciences & Research and Hospital v. Union of India

05 Sep 2017 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court directed a fresh inspection of a medical college after finding the Competent Authority's reconsideration mechanical, allowed continuation of admitted students, and kept the bank guarantee alive pending compliance.

administrative other Significant Medical College Admission Letter of Permission Medical Council of India Oversight Committee

S.N.D.P. Sakhayogam v. Kerala Atmavidya Sangham

05 Sep 2017 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre · 2017 INSC 853

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the suit for fresh trial to determine whether a registered Society can maintain a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC, emphasizing the need for judicial scrutiny of jurisdictional and substantive issues.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 1 Rule 8 CPC representative suit juristic person jurisdiction

S.N.D.P. Sakhayogam v. Kerala Atmavidya Sangham

05 Sep 2017 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the suit for fresh trial to determine whether a registered society can maintain a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC and the suit's maintainability.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 1 Rule 8 CPC representative suit juristic person capacity to sue

The State of Punjab v. B.K. Dhir

05 Sep 2017 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud · 2017 INSC 849

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of a government servant to officiating pay for higher posts held, dismissing the State's appeal against the High Court's order granting such salary.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant officiating post pay and allowances government servant Punjab Gram Panchayat Act

The State of Punjab v. B.K. Dhir

05 Sep 2017 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of a government servant to pay for officiating higher posts despite conditions limiting pay, dismissing the State's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant officiating post pay entitlement government servant Punjab Gram Panchayat Act

State of Punjab & Another v. Dharam Pal

05 Sep 2017 · Dipak Misra; A. M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of an officiating employee to the pay scale of the higher post held, rejecting conditions denying such benefits as contrary to public policy and the Punjab Civil Services Rules.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant officiating post pay scale benefits Punjab Civil Services Rules public policy

The State of Maharashtra v. Kishor M. Gadhave Patil & Ors.

05 Sep 2017 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court modified the State's cancellation of Law Officers' appointments from punitive removal under Rule 30(5) to termination at pleasure under Rule 30(6), directing payment of one month's retainer and disposing of the appeal accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Law Officers Rules 1984 Rule 30(5) Rule 30(6) cancellation of appointment

The State of Maharashtra v. Kishor M. Gadhave Patil & Ors.

05 Sep 2017 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court modified the State's cancellation of Law Officers' appointments by treating it as termination under Rule 30(6), directing payment of one month's retainer, and disposed of the appeal accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Law Officers Rules 1984 Rule 30(5) Rule 30(6) cancellation of appointment

Maharaja Amrinder Singh v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax

05 Sep 2017 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that appeals under Section 27-A of the Wealth Tax Act must be decided by the High Court only after formulating the substantial question of law, and remanded the case for fresh adjudication accordingly.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Wealth Tax Act, 1957 Section 27-A substantial question of law High Court jurisdiction