Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala

14 Nov 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that changing minimum qualifying marks for viva-voce after completion of the selection process is impermissible and referred the matter to a larger Bench for authoritative ruling.

administrative other Significant selection process minimum cut-off marks viva-voce natural justice

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED v. STATE OF BIHAR

14 Nov 2017 · R.F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the appellant is not entitled to VAT set off against Entry Tax under Bihar law as it does not incur VAT liability on sales to other oil companies, upheld the constitutional validity of the relevant provision, and remanded the matter for determination of sales outside the local area.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Entry Tax Bihar Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1993 Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 VAT set off

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED v. STATE OF BIHAR

14 Nov 2017 · R.F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the appellant is not entitled to set off VAT against Entry Tax under Bihar law as it is not liable to pay VAT on sales to other oil companies, upheld retrospective assessments, and denied interest on late payment.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Entry Tax Bihar Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1993 Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 Set off of VAT

Jaykrishna Industries Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

13 Nov 2017 · Ranjan Gogoi; Navin Sinha · 2017 INSC 1100

The Supreme Court held that a change in land use mandates a fresh tender for government land, upheld cancellation of a provisional bid, and dismissed appeals seeking settlement without public auction.

property appeal_dismissed Significant auction settlement provisional acceptance government land public tender

SAGAR PANDURANG DHUNDARE v. KESHAV AABA PATIL

13 Nov 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi · 2017 INSC 1102

The Supreme Court held that disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act applies only to persons who personally encroach upon Government land, not to family members of original encroachers unless they continue the encroachment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disqualification encroachment Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(j-3)

Sagar Pandurang Dhundare v. Keshav Aaba Patil

13 Nov 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act applies only to persons who personally encroach government land, not to family members who did not themselves commit encroachment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disqualification encroachment Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(j-3)

Jaykrishna Industries Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

13 Nov 2017 · Ranjan Gogoi; Navin Sinha · 2017 INSC 1099

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of a provisional bid acceptance for government land due to change in land use and mandated fresh public tender, rejecting private settlement claims.

property appeal_dismissed Significant provisional acceptance public auction government land settlement legitimate expectation

Jaykrishna Industries Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra and Others

13 Nov 2017 · Ranjan Gogoi; Navin Sinha · 2017 INSC 1097

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of a provisional bid acceptance for government land due to change in land use and procedural irregularities, emphasizing that government land must be allotted by public auction and not private negotiation.

property appeal_dismissed Significant provisional acceptance government land auction public tender private negotiation

Jaykrishna Industries Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

13 Nov 2017 · Ranjan Gogoi; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld the requirement of fresh public tender for government land settlement following change in land use, dismissed private negotiation claims, and affirmed lawful cancellation of provisional bid acceptance.

property appeal_dismissed Significant public auction government land settlement provisional acceptance cancellation of bid

Shivang Mathur v. Sohan Lal

13 Nov 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi · 2017 INSC 1104

The Supreme Court set aside a cryptic High Court order dismissing a petition under Article 227 and remitted the matter for a reasoned decision on the amendment of the plaint.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural amendment of plaint Article 227 Constitution of India High Court jurisdiction supervisory jurisdiction

Shivang Mathur v. Sohan Lal & Ors.

13 Nov 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's summary dismissal of a petition under Article 227 concerning amendment of plaint and remitted the matter for a reasoned decision on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Article 227 Constitution of India supervisory jurisdiction discretionary order

Prasadi Devi v. Nagar Palika Sawai Madhopur

13 Nov 2017 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre · 2017 INSC 1106

The Supreme Court allowed an elderly appellant to personally give evidence or be examined on commission, setting aside lower courts' refusal, and directed expeditious disposal of the civil suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant General Power of Attorney Examination of witnesses Examination on commission Old age and infirmity

Prasadi Devi v. Nagar Palika Sawai Madhopur

13 Nov 2017 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court allowed an elderly plaintiff to personally give evidence or be examined on commission at her residence, setting aside lower courts' orders denying this, and directed expeditious disposal of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Power of Attorney examination on commission elderly litigant permanent injunction

State of Punjab v. Bhagta

13 Nov 2017 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court condoned delay and remanded land acquisition compensation appeals to the High Court for fresh consideration due to lack of proper discussion on compensation fixation and improper dismissal on limitation grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation delay condonation limitation

State of Uttarakhand v. Jairnail Singh

13 Nov 2017 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre · 2017 INSC 1105

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused under Section 307 IPC and Arms Act, emphasizing that material infirmities in the prosecution case justified reversal of conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 25(1-A) Arms Act Acquittal Appellate jurisdiction

State of Uttarakhand v. Jairnail Singh

13 Nov 2017 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused under Section 307 IPC and Arms Act due to material infirmities in the prosecution case and improper evidence appreciation by the trial court.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 25(1-A) Arms Act Acquittal Appellate jurisdiction

Khekh Ram v. State of H.P.

10 Nov 2017 · N. V. Ramana; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court's acquittal of the appellant in an NDPS case, holding that mere recovery of personal documents without clear identification is insufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Identification Possession Search and Seizure

Khekh Ram v. State of H.P.

10 Nov 2017 · N. V. Ramana; Amitava Roy
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the acquittal of the appellant in an NDPS case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove his identity and possession of contraband beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act identification possession search and seizure

Union of India v. Maj. Gen. Manomoy Ganguly

10 Nov 2017 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld the AFT's quashing of the Review Promotion Board's decision for failing to award marks consistent with the respondent's revised profile, directing a fresh Board to consider his promotion fairly.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Promotion Board Review Special Promotion Board Annual Confidential Report Board marks

Union of India v. Maj. Gen. Manomoy Ganguly

10 Nov 2017 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing a fresh Review Promotion Board to consider the respondent's promotion fairly and consistently with the original Board's criteria after redressal of his profile.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Promotion Board Review Special Promotion Board Board marks Annual Confidential Report