Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

M/s ONGC Mangalore Petrochemicals Ltd v. M/s ANS Constructions Ltd.

07 Feb 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Amitava Roy
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a voluntarily executed No Dues Certificate constitutes full and final settlement barring arbitration absent credible evidence of duress or coercion, and set aside the High Court's order appointing an arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant No Dues Certificate Arbitration Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Duress and Coercion

R K Arora General Manager & Anr v. M/S Ace Enterprises

07 Feb 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that subordinate courts lack jurisdiction to initiate contempt proceedings against themselves under the Jammu and Kashmir Contempt of Courts Act, 1997, and such applications must be treated under civil procedure rules, directing expeditious trial of alleged injunction violations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contempt jurisdiction subordinate courts Jammu and Kashmir Contempt of Courts Act, 1997 Order XXXIX Rule 2A

THE STATE OF PUNJAB v. GURDEV SINGH

07 Feb 2018 · KURIAN JOSEPH; MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgments on land value fixation and remanded the matters for reconsideration along with connected cases following a prior remand order.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural land acquisition fixation of land value remand High Court judgments

The State of Punjab v. Gurdev Singh

07 Feb 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's land valuation judgments and remanded the matters for consolidated reconsideration following prior directions.

property appeal_allowed Procedural land acquisition land valuation remand compensation

Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

06 Feb 2018 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta · 2018 INSC 107
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court allowed bail to the accused in a cheating and dishonour of cheque case, emphasizing that bail is the rule and incarceration the exception, requiring a humane and judicious exercise of discretion.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail presumption of innocence judicial discretion cheating

Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

06 Feb 2018 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed bail to the accused emphasizing that bail is the rule and jail the exception, and judicial discretion must be exercised humanely considering all relevant factors including non-arrest during investigation and cooperation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail presumption of innocence judicial discretion cheating

Dr Akshya Bisoi and Another v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Others

06 Feb 2018 · Dipak Misra; A M Khanwilkar; Dr D Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court upheld AIIMS's seniority order among professors based on the 2005 Selection Committee's objective assessment, dismissing the petitioners' challenge due to delay and the advisory role of experts under the 1997 policy.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant seniority dispute AIIMS Selection Committee grading policy

Dr Akshya Bisoi and Another v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Others

06 Feb 2018 · Dipak Misra; A M Khanwilkar; Dr D Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court upheld AIIMS's seniority order based on the 2005 Selection Committee's discretionary assessment, dismissing the petitioners' challenge after a long delay and clarifying the advisory role of experts and the non-mechanical nature of grading under the 1997 policy.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant seniority dispute AIIMS Selection Committee grading policy 1997 Section 25 AIIMS Act

M/s Maya Appliances (P) Ltd now known as Preethi Kitchen Appliances Pvt. Ltd. v. Addl. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

06 Feb 2018 · DIPAK MISRA; A M KHANWILKAR; Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that trade discounts given after the original sale but in accordance with regular trade practice and evidenced by accounts are allowable deductions from taxable turnover under Karnataka VAT law.

tax appeal_allowed Significant trade discount taxable turnover Karnataka Value Added Tax Act 2003 Rule 3(2)(c)

M/s Maya Appliances (P) Ltd now known as Preethi Kitchen Appliances Pvt. Ltd. v. Addl. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

06 Feb 2018 · DIPAK MISRA; A M KHANWILKAR; Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that trade discounts given post-sale but in accordance with regular trade practice and supported by contemporaneous records are allowable deductions from taxable turnover under the Karnataka VAT Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant trade discount taxable turnover Karnataka Value Added Tax Act Rule 3(2)(c)

State of Karnataka v. Shankar Baburao Kangralkar

06 Feb 2018 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a candidate lacking the specific B.Ed qualification with Hindi as a teaching method is ineligible for the post of Hindi Language Assistant under the special recruitment rules, setting aside lower court decisions to the contrary.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Recruitment Rules Hindi Language Assistant B.Ed Degree Special provision

State of Karnataka v. Shankar Baburao Kangralkar

06 Feb 2018 · Madan B. Lokur; Deepak Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the specific eligibility requirement of a B.Ed Degree with Hindi as a teaching method for the post of Hindi Language Assistant is mandatory and a candidate lacking this qualification cannot be appointed.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Recruitment Rules Hindi Language Assistant Eligibility Criteria B.Ed Degree

IQ City Foundation v. Union of India

06 Feb 2018 · Dipak Misra; Amitava Roy; A.M. Khanwilkar
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Central Government's refusal to renew permission for admission to a medical college due to substantial faculty and resident deficiencies, affirming the authority's power to conduct comprehensive compliance inspections and issue reasoned orders under the Indian Medical Council Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 10-A Medical College Renewal Compliance Verification Inspection

IQ City Foundation v. Union of India

06 Feb 2018 · Dipak Misra; Amitava Roy; A.M. Khanwilkar
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Central Government's refusal to renew permission for admission to a medical college due to substantial faculty and resident doctor deficiencies, affirming the scope of compliance inspections and the necessity of reasoned administrative decisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 10-A Medical College Renewal Compliance Verification Inspection

Naveen Kumar v. Vijay Kumar and Ors.

06 Feb 2018 · Dipak Misra; A M Khanwilkar; Dr D Y Chandrachud
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the registered owner of a motor vehicle remains liable for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 if the registration certificate is not transferred despite sale, affirming the primacy of registration records in determining ownership and liability.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 2(30) Section 50 registered owner liability

Union of India v. Pushpavathi

06 Feb 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that non-award of interest under the Land Acquisition Act is not referable to the Civil Court and can be challenged only by writ petition under Article 226.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 18 Section 28 Section 28A

Union of India v. Pushpavathi

06 Feb 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that non-award of interest on land acquisition compensation under Sections 28 or 34 of the Land Acquisition Act is not referable to the Civil Court and can be challenged by writ petition under Article 226.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 28 Section 34 Section 18

Rithwik Energy Generation Pvt. Ltd. v. Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd.

06 Feb 2018 · R.F. Nariman; Navin Sinha · 2018 INSC 108

The Supreme Court upheld that a termination of a Power Purchase Agreement was invalid due to non-compliance with mandatory default notice requirements and estopped the appellant from disputing prior findings on subsequent events it introduced.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Power Purchase Agreement default notice termination notice Clause 9.3.[2]

Rithwik Energy Generation Pvt. Ltd. v. Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd.

06 Feb 2018 · R.F. Nariman; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld that a termination notice without a valid default notice under the PPA is invalid and dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging the continuation of the Power Purchase Agreement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Power Purchase Agreement default notice termination notice Clause 9.3.[2]

Madan @ Madhu Patekar v. State of Maharashtra

06 Feb 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based solely on reliable dying declarations, affirming that such declarations can form the sole basis for conviction if they inspire confidence and are free from suspicion.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC life imprisonment burn injuries