Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

X v. Rajesh Kumar

23 Apr 2025 · Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 579

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing of FIRs under the POCSO Act, holding that prima facie sexual assault was made out and directed expeditious trial with victim protection.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act sexual assault Section 7 POCSO quashing of FIR

Sakina Sultanali Sunesara v. Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat

23 Apr 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 570

A party to a suit disputing a compromise must first approach the Trial Court under Order XXIII Rule 3 proviso before filing a first appeal under Section 96 CPC; direct appeals against consent decrees are barred.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant consent decree compromise Order XXIII Rule 3 Order XLIII Rule 1-A

D.A SRINIVAS & ANR. v. M. MANJULA & ORS.

23 Apr 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 556

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's direction for CBI to conduct further investigation into the suspicious death of K. Raghunath, affirming the power of constitutional courts to order independent probes in exceptional cases to ensure justice.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant CBI investigation further investigation Section 173(8) CrPC Magistrate jurisdiction

Rajan Chadha & Anr. v. Sanjay Arora

23 Apr 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih

A Single Judge of a High Court cannot overturn a contempt finding made by another Single Judge of the same Court; the Supreme Court set aside such an order and remitted the matter for reconsideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Contempt of Court Coordinate Bench Judicial propriety Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Rajeev Gupta v. Prashant Garg

23 Apr 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 552
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the suit for cancellation of sale deeds and recovery of possession was barred by limitation, the sale deeds were not void due to injunction, and the plaintiffs failed to prove title by will, thereby setting aside the decree in their favor.

civil appeal_allowed Significant limitation will proof Section 52 Transfer of Property Act Section 41 Transfer of Property Act

SRI SHRIKANTH NS & ORS. v. K. MUNIVENKATAPPA & ANR.

23 Apr 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 557

The Supreme Court held that production of documents under Order XI Rule 14 CPC cannot be ordered after the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, setting aside the lower courts' orders allowing such production while affirming permission to raise additional grounds in appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XI Rule 14 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC production of documents rejection of plaint

State of Sikkim and Others v. Dr. Mool Raj Kotwal

23 Apr 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 559

The Supreme Court held that a government servant is entitled to leave encashment only once on retirement under Rule 36 and not again after re-employment, setting aside the High Court's contrary rulings.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant leave encashment re-employment Sikkim Government Services (Leave) Rules, 1982 Rule 36

Bijender Singh v. Union of India

23 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 549
Cites 0 · Cited by 226

The Supreme Court held that disability pension must be granted at 50% to an armed forces personnel invalided out with a disability presumed attributable to service, setting aside the Tribunal's orders denying relief based on disability below 20%.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disability pension armed forces invaliding medical board attributable to military service

Pawan Kumar Agrawal & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

23 Apr 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that appellants' seniority must be reckoned from their appointment date but granted them seniority over officers appointed after the High Court's order due to undue delay in their appointment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant seniority judicial appointments reservation quota finality of order

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sanjay Kumar; State of Himachal Pradesh v. Chaman Shukla

23 Apr 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 561

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused in a rape and kidnapping case due to material contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant prosecutrix testimony rape kidnapping contradictions in evidence

DINESH SHARMA v. EMGEE CABLES AND COMMUNICATION LTD. & ANR.

23 Apr 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 571

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court’s quashing of an FIR alleging economic offences, holding that such allegations require thorough investigation and cannot be dismissed as mere civil disputes at the initial stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR economic offences fraud

Ramyash @ Lal Bahadur v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

23 Apr 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot alter its final judgment beyond correcting clerical errors under Section 362 Cr.P.C., quashing the modification of conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part II IPC and restoring the original conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 362 Cr.P.C. clerical error alteration of judgment Section 302 IPC

Pramila Devi & Ors. v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.

23 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 560

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate taking cognizance under Section 190 CrPC need not record detailed reasons and that the High Court erred in setting aside the cognizance order without finding absence of prima facie material.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant cognizance prima facie case Section 190 CrPC SC/ST Act

Sivakumar v. Inspector of Police

23 Apr 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 558

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against an appellant who was not the authorized officer at the time of the alleged fraudulent auction sale under the SARFAESI Act, holding that continuation of trial would be an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC SARFAESI Act authorized officer quashing of criminal proceedings

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Prakash Singh

23 Apr 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 555

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of a disciplinary punishment due to procedural violations including non-supply of enquiry report and failure to conduct a proper enquiry within stipulated time, affirming the essentiality of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary enquiry natural justice enquiry report non-supply of documents

Maharana Pratap Singh v. State of Bihar

23 Apr 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 554
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal of a police constable due to procedural irregularities and acquittal in criminal proceedings on substantially similar charges, awarding compensation in lieu of reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings natural justice cross-examination criminal acquittal

Hussain Ahmed Choudhury & Ors. v. Habibur Rahman

23 Apr 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 553
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a plaintiff not party to a subsequent sale deed is not required to seek its cancellation to claim title based on a prior valid gift deed, allowing the appeal and restoring the original decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Gift Deed Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31 Section 34

RAMANUJ KUMAR v. PRIYANKA

22 Apr 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 543
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dissolved the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown under Article 142 and granted visitation rights to the mother despite no formal custody petition.

family appeal_allowed Significant irretrievable breakdown divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Article 142 Constitution of India

Chellammal and Another v. State

22 Apr 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 540

The Supreme Court held that courts must mandatorily consider probation under the Probation of Offenders Act for offences punishable with imprisonment less than life, remanding the case for reconsideration of probation despite upholding convictions under Section 498A IPC.

criminal remanded Significant Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 Section 360 CrPC Section 361 CrPC Section 498A IPC

KANCHHU v. PRAKASH CHAND

22 Apr 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 542
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s order recalling dismissal of a writ petition and setting aside an ex parte decree, holding that the High Court erred in reappraising merits without proper consideration of sufficient cause under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC Article 227 Constitution condonation of delay