Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Sunita & Ors. v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

14 Feb 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award, holding that motor accident claims require proof on preponderance of probability and that the High Court erred in reversing the Tribunal's findings on hyper-technical grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Accident Claims Preponderance of Probability Negligence Eyewitness Evidence

The State of Maharashtra v. Surendra Pundlik Gadling & Ors.

13 Feb 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; L. Nageswara Rao; Sanjay Kishan Kaul · 2019 INSC 188

The Supreme Court held that a report by the Public Prosecutor under Section 43D(2)(b) of UAPA must show independent application of mind and specific reasons for extension of investigation, and allowed the State's appeal against default bail granted due to alleged non-compliance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 43D UAPA Public Prosecutor report extension of investigation default bail

The State of Maharashtra v. Surendra Pundlik Gadling & Ors.

13 Feb 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; L. Nageswara Rao; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that a Public Prosecutor’s report under Section 43D(2)(b) of UAPA must show independent application of mind and satisfaction with investigation progress to validly extend custody, denying default bail where such requirements are met.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 43D UAPA Public Prosecutor report extension of investigation default bail

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board v. TNEB-Thozhilalar Aykkiya Sangam

13 Feb 2019 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that under a wage settlement, the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board was entitled to pay Dearness Allowance at rates and dates sanctioned by the State Government, not at higher Central Government rates, considering financial constraints.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Dearness Allowance Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Wage Settlement Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board v. TNEB-Thozhilalar Aykkiya Sangam

13 Feb 2019 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board was entitled to pay Dearness Allowance to its employees at the rates sanctioned by the State Government, not the Central Government rates, in accordance with the binding wage settlement and considering financial constraints.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Dearness Allowance Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 wage settlement Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Union of India v. C. Girija

13 Feb 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K.M. Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a belated challenge to a promotion panel and reservation allocation is barred by delay and laches, and a candidate who participated without objection cannot later question the selection process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant delay and laches promotion limited departmental competitive examination reservation

Appellant v. Director of Fisheries, Kerala

13 Feb 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta · 2019 INSC 190

The Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka government's authority to revise pay scales and create intermediate pay scales for officers, dismissing the appellants' challenge to the pay revision orders.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant pay revision government officers salary scales intermediate pay scale

T.I. Jose v. Managing Director, Kerala Water Authority

13 Feb 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the invalidity of an administratively created intermediate post affecting pay scales, affirming that statutory rules govern pay revisions and dismissing the appeal challenging the deletion of the post and restoration of pay scales.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Kerala Water Authority pay revision intermediate post Senior Operator

അപ്പീല്‍വകാദസി v. മകാജനജസിഷഗസ് ഡയറക്ടര

13 Feb 2019 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka High Court's dismissal of the appeal challenging government orders on salary fixation and intermediate pay scales for Karnataka Water Authority employees, affirming the principles of proportionality and administrative discretion in pay fixation.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant salary fixation pay scale proportionality parity

T.I. Jose v. Managing Director, Kerala Water Authority

13 Feb 2019 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that creation or abolition of an intermediate post affecting pay scales under statutory rules requires formal amendment, not administrative order, and upheld the lawful restoration of pay scales following invalidation of such a post.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant pay revision intermediate post Senior Operator statutory rules

Vasant Chemicals Limited v. Managing Director, Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board

13 Feb 2019 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the levy of sewerage cess on an industrial occupier discharging effluents into the Board's sewerage system through an intermediary, rejecting exemption under the proviso and double levy claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant sewerage cess Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1989 Section 55 proviso interpretation

State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. v. Mohd. Suleman Siddiqui

12 Feb 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that the respondent was a daily wage employee without right to regularisation, upheld protection against unlawful termination, and directed payment of arrears without conferring permanent employment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant daily wage employee regularisation termination without due process Rule 22 Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff Rules 1985

State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. v. Mohd. Suleman Siddiqui

12 Feb 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a daily wage employee has no right to regularisation absent lawful appointment, but cannot be terminated without due process, entitling him only to arrears of wages.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant daily wage employee regularisation Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff Rules 1985 Article 226 Constitution

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. M/S. KARAMDEEP FINANCE & INVESTMENT (I) PVT. LTD.

12 Feb 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that no unearned increase is payable by an auction purchaser of leasehold rights after compulsory acquisition and upheld the denial of refund of conversion charges, directing the DDA to process conversion application in accordance with law.

property appeal_allowed Significant unearned increase leasehold rights freehold rights auction sale

INTERNATIONAL SPIRITS AND WINES ASSOCIATION OF INDIA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

12 Feb 2019 · Navin Sinha; K. M. Joseph
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court struck down the Haryana rule granting a single statewide liquor license by the Financial Commissioner as ultra vires the Punjab Excise Act, holding that only the State Government can regulate the number of licenses in local areas.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Punjab Excise Act, 1914 Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970 Rule 24(i-eeee) Financial Commissioner

Parkash Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh

12 Feb 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction for rape and criminal intimidation due to unexplained delay in FIR, contradictory evidence, and lack of credible corroboration, granting him the benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant delay in FIR rape Section 376 IPC criminal intimidation

Parkash Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh

12 Feb 2019 · Ranjan Gogoi; Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction for rape and criminal intimidation due to unreliable prosecution evidence and unjustified delay in lodging the FIR.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape delay in FIR extra-judicial confession benefit of doubt

Dealers Association Bundi v. Sanyojak Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Mazdoor Sangh

12 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside an ex parte industrial award and remanded the case for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the right of parties to a fair opportunity to contest disputes on merits.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ex parte award opportunity to be heard natural justice

Dealers Association Bundi v. Sanyojak Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Mazdoor Sangh

12 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court set aside an ex parte Industrial Tribunal award for failure to afford the appellant an opportunity to contest, remanding the case for fresh adjudication on merits.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ex parte award opportunity to contest natural justice

Mala Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana

12 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of two accused, altering their conviction from murder under Section 302/34 IPC to causing hurt under Section 324 IPC due to lack of evidence of common intention, and held that alteration of charge from Section 149 IPC to Section 34 IPC requires supporting evidence to avoid prejudice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 149 IPC alteration of charge