Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. v. Tata Communications Ltd.

27 Feb 2019 · R. F. Nariman; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that quantum meruit claims under Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act are impermissible when an express contract governs the parties, and liquidated damages clauses are the exclusive remedy for breach.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant quantum meruit Section 70 Indian Contract Act liquidated damages breach of contract

The State of Gujarat v. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya

27 Feb 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in TADA cases due to invalid prior sanction under Section 20-A(2), rendering confessional statements inadmissible and prosecution unsustainable.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant TADA prior sanction Section 20-A(2) confessional statement

State of Gujarat v. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya

27 Feb 2019 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld acquittal due to invalid prior sanction under TADA, rendering confessions inadmissible and prosecution unsustainable.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant TADA prior sanction Section 20-A(2) confessional statement

Shankar v. State of Maharashtra

26 Feb 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the arson conviction of one appellant, modifying sentences of others based on compromise, and clarifying that compromise is a relevant factor in sentencing non-compoundable offences under IPC.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 436 IPC Section 323 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention

Kishan Singh alias Actor v. State of Uttaranchal (Now Uttarakhand) & Anr.

26 Feb 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder and reduced the sentence from life imprisonment to ten years, emphasizing the absence of premeditation and accidental nature of the fatal injury.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-I IPC culpable homicide murder

Competent Authority Calcutta v. David Mantosh & Ors.

26 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 excludes Civil Court jurisdiction over ceiling proceedings, dismissing the suit challenging vesting notifications and ownership of urban land.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Civil Court jurisdiction Implied exclusion Vesting of land

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Ganga Saran

26 Feb 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the Reference Court's compensation award for land acquisition at Rs.99 per sq. yard, dismissing the appellant's challenge and affirming the valuation based on relevant evidence as of the notification date.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 4(1) Notification Compensation Market value

Vaishnorani Mahila Bachat Gat v. State of Maharashtra

26 Feb 2019 · Arun Mishra; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that tender conditions mandating extrusion technology for ICDS supplementary nutrition were not mandatory and must not exclude genuine local women’s groups, reaffirming the preference for decentralized provisioning through Mahila Mandals and self-help groups.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Integrated Child Development Scheme Supplementary Nutrition Programme Mahila Mandals Self Help Groups

Vaishnorani Mahila Bachat Gat v. State of Maharashtra

26 Feb 2019 · Arun Mishra; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that tender conditions mandating extrusion technology and onerous criteria excluding genuine local women’s groups in ICDS supplementary nutrition provisioning are arbitrary and directed the State to ensure decentralization in line with its prior orders and Central guidelines.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Integrated Child Development Scheme Supplementary Nutrition Programme Mahila Mandals Self-Help Groups

The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority v. Arminderjit Kaur

26 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court modified interim orders in land acquisition appeals by directing full deposit of enhanced compensation with partial withdrawal allowed upon security, balancing parties' interests pending final disposal.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation interim deposit stay order

The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority v. Arminderjit Kaur

26 Feb 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court modified the High Court's interim order in land acquisition compensation appeals, directing deposit of the entire awarded amount with partial withdrawal allowed upon security, pending final disposal.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation interim order deposit of awarded amount

DLF Homes Panchkula (P) Ltd. v. Sushila Devi

26 Feb 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld consumer claims against a real estate developer for delayed possession, directing refund with 9% interest and clarifying computation and jurisdictional issues.

civil appeal_allowed Significant real estate delayed possession consumer protection interest on refund

Shankar v. State of Maharashtra

26 Feb 2019 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy · 2019 INSC 273

The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal by acquitting one appellant of arson due to lack of common intention evidence and modified sentences of others considering compromise, affirming that compromise is relevant for sentencing but does not permit compounding non-compoundable offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 436 IPC Section 323 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention

Union of India v. Coastal Container Transporters Association

26 Feb 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; R. Subhash Reddy · 2019 INSC 272
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions challenging show cause notices on service tax classification are generally not maintainable and set aside the High Court's quashing of such notices, directing statutory adjudication on merits.

tax appeal_allowed Significant service tax cargo handling service goods transport agency show cause notice

Union of India v. Coastal Container Transporters Association

26 Feb 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; R. Subhash Reddy
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions challenging show cause notices on service classification are generally not maintainable at that stage and set aside the High Court's quashing of such notices, directing statutory adjudication instead.

tax appeal_allowed Significant service tax cargo handling service goods transport agency show cause notice

Aarish Asgar Qureshi v. Fareed Ahmed Qureshi

26 Feb 2019 · R. F. Nariman; Rohinton Fali Nariman; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that prosecution for perjury under Section 340 Cr.P.C. requires a prima facie case of deliberate falsehood supported by unimpeachable evidence and set aside the High Court's order initiating such proceedings based on preliminary reports.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 340 Cr.P.C. perjury anticipatory bail false statement

DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. BALWAN SINGH & ORS.

26 Feb 2019 · S. A. Bobde; Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Deepak Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that periods of unauthorized absence without leave salary cannot be counted as qualifying service for pension under the Pension Rules, thereby denying pension benefits to employees who do not meet the qualifying service requirement despite availing VRS.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Voluntary Retirement Scheme Pension Rules Qualifying service Unauthorized absence

DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. BALWAN SINGH & ORS.

26 Feb 2019 · S. A. Bobde; Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that periods of unauthorized absence without leave salary cannot be counted as qualifying service for pension under the Pension Rules, allowing DTC's appeal and denying pension benefits for such periods.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Voluntary Retirement Scheme Pension Rules Qualifying service Unauthorized absence

M/S. Model Economic Township Ltd. v. Land Acquisition Collector

26 Feb 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Hemant Gupta · 2019 INSC 269

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition challenging premature redetermination of land acquisition compensation, holding that the petitioner’s delay and failure to inform the Collector of pending appeals disentitled it from relief.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 28A compensation determination finality of award

M/S. Model Economic Township Ltd. v. Land Acquisition Collector

26 Feb 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition challenging premature redetermination of compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, holding that finality of awards depends on appellate disposal and delay by the petitioner disentitles relief.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 28A Compensation redetermination Finality of award