Supreme Court of India

15,092 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1206 judgments found

Sangrur Sales Corporation v. United India Insurance Company Limited & Anr

17 Jan 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an insurance policy exclusion for excavation damage applies only to excavations by the insured on their own property, allowing the insured's claim for damage caused by a third party's adjacent excavation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance policy exclusion clause excavation damage subsidence

M/S. PAWAN HANS LIMITED v. AVIATION KARMACHARI SANGHATANA

17 Jan 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that contractual employees of a Government Company are entitled to provident fund benefits under the company's PF Trust Regulations and the EPF Act, rejecting the company's claim of exemption under Section 16 and limiting retrospective benefits to the date of litigation.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 16 exemption contractual employees provident fund benefits

Union of India v. Chandra Bhushan Yadav

17 Jan 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Air Force Act and Rules exclude mandatory FIR registration under CrPC, upheld the validity of Court Martial proceedings, and dismissed the appeal against the acquittal of the Respondent for lack of evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Air Force Act, 1950 Court Martial Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 FIR registration

M/S. PAWAN HANS LIMITED v. AVIATION KARMACHARI SANGHATANA

17 Jan 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that contractual employees of a Government Company are entitled to provident fund benefits under the company’s PF Trust Regulations, rejecting the Company’s claim of exemption under Section 16 of the EPF Act, but limited retrospective benefits to the date of the writ petition.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 16 exemption contractual employees provident fund benefits

Union of India v. Brig. Balbir Singh

16 Jan 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA · 2020 INSC 48
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Army officers appointed on tenure basis in MES are not entitled to the same grade pay as civilian Chief Engineers under IDSE Rules, affirming the validity of classification between military and civilian personnel for pay purposes.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant equal pay for equal work grade pay Military Engineering Service Indian Defence Service of Engineers

Union of India v. Brig. Balbir Singh

16 Jan 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Army Officers appointed on tenure basis in MES are not entitled to grade pay parity with civilian Chief Engineers governed by IDSE Rules, affirming the validity of classification between military and civilian personnel.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant grade pay Military Engineering Service Indian Defence Service of Engineers equal pay for equal work

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Krishna Kant & Ors.

16 Jan 2020 · Sanjay Vikash Kaul; K. M. Joseph · 2020 INSC 47

The Supreme Court held that disputes arising under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of industrial dispute forums and dismissed the writ petition challenging fines and injunction orders as not maintainable before the Court.

industrial appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 exclusive jurisdiction industrial dispute forums civil courts jurisdiction

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Ramesh Kumar Sharma

16 Jan 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction over disputes exclusively arising under the Industrial Disputes Act, directing expeditious disposal of pending civil suits and dismissing the appeal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 civil court jurisdiction industrial dispute

Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Jan 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the Expert Appraisal Committee's recommendation to grant Environmental Clearance for the Mopa airport project, affirming the adequacy of its expertise, appraisal process, and environmental safeguards.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Clearance Expert Appraisal Committee Environmental Impact Assessment Western Ghats

Uttar Pradesh State v. Ali Hussain Ansari & Ors.

15 Jan 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Sanjeev Khanna

The Supreme Court upheld pension entitlement from the date of recognized service despite non-payment of salary, rejecting the State's appeal and awarding compensation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pension benefits retirement benefits continuous service no work no pay

The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ali Hussain Ansari

15 Jan 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that the first respondent's appointment date shall be treated as actual joining date for service benefits, excluding salary arrears, and awarded equitable compensation for the period of non-appointment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant post-retirement benefits seniority no work no pay appointment date

State v. M. Murugesan

15 Jan 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by issuing directions unrelated to a bail application after granting bail, and set aside the impugned order constituting a committee for criminal justice reforms.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 439 CrPC Section 482 CrPC High Court jurisdiction bail application

Uttam Chand v. Nathu Ram & Ors.

15 Jan 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that defendants failed to prove adverse possession against the plaintiff's lawful title, setting aside the limitation bar and decreeing the suit for possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession animus possidendi limitation possession

Uttam Chand v. Nathu Ram

15 Jan 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that adverse possession requires clear hostile possession denying the true owner's title and set aside the High Court's finding of adverse possession, decreeing the plaintiff's suit for possession based on title.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession hostile possession animus possidendi limitation

The Executive Engineer, Nimna Dudhna Project, Selu, District Parbhani, Maharashtra v. The State of Maharashtra & Others

15 Jan 2020 · M.R. Shah; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that interest on enhanced compensation for delayed appeals in land acquisition cases should be denied when delay is condoned without conditions, relieving the public acquiring body from liability for delay not attributable to it.

civil appeal_allowed Significant delay in appeal statutory benefits interest on compensation land acquisition

MOHD. RASHID v. THE DIRECTOR, LOCAL BODIES, NEW SECRETARIAT

15 Jan 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA

The Supreme Court held that direct recruitment to municipal posts is permissible only after exhausting promotion and deputation options, and candidates do not acquire a vested right to appointment merely by appearing in the merit list.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant direct recruitment promotion quota deputation quota Recruitment Rules

Rajneesh Khajuria v. M/s. Wockhardt Ltd. & Anr.

15 Jan 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a termination order is deemed communicated once issued, transfers are not mala fide without proof of improper motive, and only the Labour Court has jurisdiction over termination disputes under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant unfair labour practices mala fide transfer termination order communication Industrial Court jurisdiction

The Executive Engineer, Nimna Dudhna Project, Selu, District Parbhani, Maharashtra v. The State of Maharashtra & Others

15 Jan 2020 · M.R. Shah; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that while delay in preferring appeals can be condoned, claimants are not entitled to interest on enhanced compensation for the delayed period if the delay is attributable to them, and modified the High Court's order accordingly.

property appeal_allowed Significant delay in appeal statutory benefits interest on compensation land acquisition

Gajaraba Bhikhubha Vadher & Ors. v. Sumara Umar Amad

14 Jan 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy · 2020 INSC 39

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's partial dismissal of a Second Appeal for failure to properly consider substantial questions of law and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of appellants' rights as purchasers and related legal issues.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Second Appeal Substantial Questions of Law Confirmation Deed Transfer of Property Act Section 52

Gajaraba Bhikhubha Vadher & Ors. v. Sumara Umar Amad

14 Jan 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court remanded a Second Appeal for proper consideration and reasoned answers to substantial questions of law concerning property rights and confirmation deeds, emphasizing procedural correctness under Section 100 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Second Appeal Substantial Questions of Law Confirmation Deed Section 100 CPC