Supreme Court of India

15,092 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1206 judgments found

Chandra Mohan Varma v. State of Uttar Pradesh

21 Jan 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that the extension of retirement age for medical teachers to 65 years applies prospectively and does not benefit those who had already attained superannuation before the notification, with session ending benefit not altering the retirement date.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant age of superannuation session ending benefit medical teachers retirement Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules

Chandra Mohan Varma v. State of Uttar Pradesh

21 Jan 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the enhancement of retirement age to 65 years applies prospectively and does not benefit medical faculty who had already attained 60 years before the notification, with session ending benefit not postponing superannuation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant age of superannuation session ending benefit Fundamental Rules special order

Paul v. State of Kerala

21 Jan 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, rejecting the appellant's plea of suicide and sudden fight, and held that intoxication did not negate the requisite intention.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 300 IPC exceptions

Paul v. State of Kerala

21 Jan 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, rejecting the appellant's plea of suicide and sudden fight, and held that intoxication does not negate the intention to cause death.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder culpable homicide Section 300 IPC exceptions

HARYANA POWER PURCHASE CENTRE v. MAGNUM POWER GENERATION LIMITED

21 Jan 2020 · R. F. Nariman; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that fixed costs under a power purchase agreement must be paid despite non-supply of power when mandated by a regulatory tariff order, allowing the appellant's claim against the respondent.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Power Purchase Agreement fixed cost recovery Plant Load Factor Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission

HARYANA POWER PURCHASE CENTRE v. MAGNUM POWER GENERATION LIMITED

21 Jan 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Rohinton Fali Nariman; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that fixed costs under a power purchase agreement must be paid to the generator despite no power supply when mandated by a regulatory tariff order, setting aside contrary orders of the regulatory commission and appellate tribunal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Fixed Cost Plant Load Factor Tariff Order

Dr Nallapareddy Sridhar Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

21 Jan 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order allowing alteration and addition of charges under Sections 406 and 420 IPC before judgment, emphasizing the wide power of courts under Section 216 CrPC to ensure fair trial without prejudice to the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 216 CrPC alteration of charge framing of charge Sections 406 and 420 IPC

Karnataka State Seeds Development Corporation Limited v. H.L. Kaveri

21 Jan 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that non-enclosure of mandatory experience certificates as per recruitment advertisement justifies rejection of application and writ jurisdiction cannot be used to override eligibility conditions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant recruitment advertisement mandatory eligibility experience certificate application rejection

Nirmal Kumar Parsan v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

21 Jan 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Sales of imported goods stored in bonded warehouses within West Bengal to foreign-going ships as ship stores are taxable sales within the State and do not qualify as sales in the course of import exempt from sales tax.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant sale in the course of import customs frontiers of India bonded warehouse sales tax

Nirmal Kumar Parsan v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

21 Jan 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Sales of imported goods stored in bonded warehouses within West Bengal and sold as ship stores to foreign-going ships are taxable sales within the State and do not qualify as sales in the course of import exempt from sales tax.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant sales tax course of import bonded warehouse customs frontiers

Kamlesh v. Union of India

20 Jan 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a provisional appointment does not confer a right to regularization or back wages, dismissing the appeal but permitting continuation in service until regular appointment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant provisional appointment Extra Departmental Employee regularization seniority

Kamlesh v. Union of India

20 Jan 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that a provisional appointment does not confer any right to regularization or back wages, dismissing the appellant’s claim and permitting her to hold the post only until regular appointment is made.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant provisional appointment regularization Extra Departmental Employee seniority

Yashistha Sahu v. Rajasthan State and Others

20 Jan 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Avinrudh Bose

The Supreme Court upheld the Rajasthan High Court’s order directing the wife to return the child to the USA, emphasizing the child's best interests and respect for foreign custody orders in cross-border disputes.

family appeal_dismissed Significant child custody habeas corpus foreign court orders best interest of child

Yashita Sahu v. State of Rajasthan

20 Jan 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that in international child custody disputes, the child's welfare is paramount, foreign court orders are persuasive but not binding, and issued directions balancing custody and visitation rights while rejecting coercive orders against an adult spouse.

family appeal_allowed Significant writ of habeas corpus child custody foreign court orders doctrine of comity

Yashita Sahu v. Rajasthan State

20 Jan 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court upheld the maintainability of a habeas corpus petition in a cross-border child custody dispute, emphasizing the child's best interests and directing interim custody and visitation arrangements pending foreign court orders.

family appeal_dismissed Significant habeas corpus child custody foreign court orders best interests of the child

Yashita Sahu v. State of Rajasthan

20 Jan 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that in international child custody disputes, the child's welfare prevails over foreign court orders and directed custody and visitation arrangements balancing parental rights and the child's best interests.

family appeal_allowed Significant habeas corpus child custody foreign court orders doctrine of comity

M/S FAIR COMMUNICATION AND CONSULTANTS & ANR v. SURENDRA KERDILE

20 Jan 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree for recovery of ₹80,000 loan, rejecting the appellants' benami and evidentiary objections and affirming the burden of proof on benami claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant loan recovery benami transaction General Power of Attorney photocopy admissibility

Pawan Kumar Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi

20 Jan 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A.S. Bopanna · 2020 INSC 55

The Supreme Court held that once a plea of juvenility is conclusively rejected by all courts including the Supreme Court, it cannot be re-agitated by filing a fresh application under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant juvenility juvenile justice Section 7A JJ Act age determination

Pawan Kumar Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi

20 Jan 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that once a plea of juvenility is conclusively rejected by all courts including the Supreme Court, it cannot be re-agitated by filing a fresh application under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant juvenility juvenile justice Section 7A JJ Act age verification

Sangrur Sales Corporation v. United India Insurance Company Limited

17 Jan 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that an insurance policy exclusion for damage caused by excavation applies only to the insured's own property, not third-party excavation, and restored the insured's claim for loss due to adjacent excavation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance policy exclusion clause excavation damage subsidence