Supreme Court of India
15,089 judgments
M/S CRAFT INTERIORS(P) LTD. v. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (INTELLIGENCE) & ANR.
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 6(4)(m)(i) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, holding that deductions for goods used in the same form do not expand the charging section under Section 5B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act.
M/S CRAFT INTERIORS(P) LTD. v. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (INTELLIGENCE) & ANR.
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 6(4)(m)(i) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957, holding that deductions for goods used in the same form do not expand the charging section and that transformed goods are separately taxable under Section 5B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act.
Sunil Vasudeva v. Sundar Gupta
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s review order restoring a writ petition challenging an Income Tax Department auction sale of property, emphasizing the applicability of Section 293 Income Tax Act and principles of review jurisdiction.
Arshnoor Singh v. Harpal Kaur
The Supreme Court held that property inherited before 1956 remains coparcenary property and sale deeds executed without legal necessity or consideration by a coparcener are void, allowing the appellant's appeal to set aside such sales.
Madhav Prasad Aggarwal & Anr. v. Axis Bank Ltd. & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC, a plaint cannot be rejected only against one defendant and set aside the High Court's partial rejection of the plaint against the bank, restoring the suit to proceed.
Pradeep Ram v. State of Jharkhand & Anr
The Supreme Court held that NIA's re-registration of FIR is not a second FIR, further investigation after charge sheet is permissible, and earlier bail does not automatically cover newly added offences requiring fresh bail or court permission for arrest.
Pradeep Ram v. State of Jharkhand & Anr
The Supreme Court held that re-registration of FIR by NIA under statutory powers is valid, further investigation after charge sheet is permissible, and earlier bail does not automatically extend to newly added offences requiring fresh bail application or court permission for arrest.
VASAVI ENGINEERING COLLEGE PARENTS ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF TELANGANA
The Supreme Court held that courts must exercise judicial restraint and cannot substitute their own view for the expert statutory committee's fee fixation unless there is arbitrariness or illegality, restoring the TAFRC's fee structure for Telangana unaided professional institutions.
Parminder Singh v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a permanently disabled motor accident victim, held the insurer liable to pay initially despite invalid driver licenses, and emphasized just compensation considering actual income, disability, and attendant care.
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited v. Reynders Label Printing India Private Limited
The Supreme Court held that a non-signatory group company cannot be bound by an arbitration agreement absent clear assent, dismissing the petition against respondent No.2 but appointing an arbitrator for domestic arbitration between petitioner and respondent No.1.
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited v. Reynders Label Printing India Private Limited
The Supreme Court held that a non-signatory company cannot be bound by an arbitration agreement absent clear evidence of intention to be bound, dismissing the petition against respondent No.2 and appointing an arbitrator for domestic arbitration between the petitioner and respondent No.1.
Srilekha Sentilkumar v. Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBI
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of the discharge application under Section 239 Cr.P.C., holding that disputed issues must be tried on merits after evidence is adduced.
Srilekha Sentilkumar v. Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBI
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of the discharge application under Section 239 Cr.P.C., holding that disputed issues must be tried on merits after evidence is adduced.
The Executive Engineer, M.I.W. v. Vitthal Damodar Patil
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's acceptance of a valuation report without proper scrutiny and remanded the land acquisition compensation dispute for fresh consideration on merits.
DODDAMUNIYAPPA v. MUNISWAMY
The Supreme Court held that a compromise entered into by some joint family members without consent of other coparceners does not bind the non-consenting members in respect of their share in joint family property.
DODDAMUNIYAPPA v. MUNISWAMY
The Supreme Court held that a compromise in execution proceedings by some joint family members without consent of other coparceners does not bind the non-consenting coparceners' rights in ancestral joint family property.
Union of India v. Ranjit Kumar Saha
The Supreme Court held that the General Assam Rifles Court has jurisdiction to try offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act against Assam Rifles personnel under the Assam Rifles Act, 2006, overruling the High Court's contrary view.
Satvinder Singh Saluja & Ors. v. State of Bihar
The Supreme Court held that a private vehicle on a public road qualifies as a public place under Bihar Excise law, validating cognizance of liquor consumption offence, but allowed appellants to seek discharge at trial.
Satvinder Singh Saluja & Ors. v. State of Bihar
The Supreme Court held that a private vehicle on a public road can be a 'public place' under Bihar Excise law, upheld cognizance of liquor consumption offence, and allowed appellants to seek discharge before the Magistrate.
The State of Tamil Nadu v. Dr. Vasanthi Veerasekaran
The Supreme Court held that the State Government is not legally obligated to allot alternative housing sites to landowners displaced by acquisition for a Central Government MRTS project absent any statutory or policy mandate, setting aside the High Court's direction to the contrary.