Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Sudam @ Rahul Kaniram Jadhav v. The State of Maharashtra

01 Oct 2019 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Indira Banerjee
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment without remission in a murder case based on circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the limited scope of review and the prudence doctrine in capital sentencing.

criminal sentence_modified Significant circumstantial evidence death penalty review jurisdiction extra-judicial confession

The Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. v. Grace Sathyavathy Shashikant & Ors.

01 Oct 2019 · R. F. Nariman; K. M. Joseph; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court set aside the allotment of Survey No. 129/45/D land to Andhra Prabha Publications, directing its delivery to the appellants and refund of amounts paid, exercising its powers under Article 142 to resolve conflicting survey reports and claims.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land Ceiling Survey No. 129/45/D land allotment Article 142 Constitution

The Government of Andhra Pradesh v. Grace Sathyavathy Shashikant

01 Oct 2019 · R. F. Nariman; K. M. Joseph; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court set aside the allotment of Survey No. 129/45/D to Andhra Prabha Publications, directing its return to the appellants and refund of amounts paid, resolving conflicting survey reports under Article 142.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land Ceiling Act Survey No. 129/45/D land allotment Article 142 Constitution

Union of India v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

01 Oct 2019 · Arun Mishra; M.R. Shah; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court upheld its guidelines to prevent misuse of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, affirming judicial restraint and the constitutional validity of statutory provisions barring anticipatory bail while emphasizing respect for legislative domain and separation of powers.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 18 anticipatory bail Article 142

Union of India v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

01 Oct 2019 · Arun Mishra; M.R. Shah; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Atrocities Act and its provisions barring anticipatory bail, emphasized mandatory FIR registration without preliminary enquiry, and clarified limits on judicial directions to avoid encroaching legislative domain.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 18 anticipatory bail FIR registration

Brijesh Kumar and Another v. Shardabai by LRs. and Others

01 Oct 2019 · Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that the plaintiff failed to prove adverse possession over the suit lands due to suspicious Khasra entries and valid sale deeds, allowing the appeal and dismissing the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession Khasra entries Land Revenue Code possession

DIST. COLLECTOR SATARA & ANR. v. MANGESH NIVRUTTI KASHID

01 Oct 2019 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the State's power to constitute Scrutiny Committees differing from earlier judicial directions but mandated fresh verification of caste certificates issued without proper vigilance inquiry during an interim period.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant caste certificate Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes Scrutiny Committee

Sagar Sharma v. Phoenix Arc Pvt. Ltd.

30 Sep 2019 · R. F. Nariman; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for Section 7 applications under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is governed solely by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, and the Code's commencement date does not trigger limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 IBC Limitation Act, 1963 Article 137 Limitation Act

Sagar Sharma v. Phoenix Arc Pvt. Ltd.

30 Sep 2019 · R. F. Nariman; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that Article 137 of the Limitation Act governs the limitation period for Section 7 applications under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and the Code's commencement date does not trigger limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 IBC Limitation Act, 1963 Article 137 Limitation Act

K. H. NAZAR v. MATHEW K. JACOB & ORS

30 Sep 2019 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA

The Supreme Court held that land used for quarrying is not a 'commercial site' exempt under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, thereby subjecting such land to the Act's land ceiling provisions.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 commercial site quarrying land ceiling

Anupal Singh and Others v. State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Personnel Department

30 Sep 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna · 2019 INSC 1099

The Supreme Court held that rectifying category-wise vacancies to comply with reservation laws does not change the rules mid-selection and upheld the selection process, estopping unsuccessful candidates from challenging it after participating in interviews.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation category-wise vacancies UP Reservation Act, 1994 Agriculture Service Rules, 1993

Anupal Singh and Others v. State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Personnel Department

30 Sep 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that rectifying category-wise vacancy calculations before interviews to comply with reservation laws does not change the rules mid-selection and upheld the selection process, dismissing challenges by unsuccessful candidates who participated in interviews.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation category-wise vacancies UP Reservation Act, 1994 Agriculture Service Rules, 1993

State of Rajasthan v. Sahi Ram

27 Sep 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran · 2019 INSC 1096

The Supreme Court held that non-production of the entire seized contraband is not fatal if seizure and sample testing are properly proved, restoring conviction under the NDPS Act and modifying sentence to 10 years rigorous imprisonment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act contraband material seizure non-production of Muddamal

State of Rajasthan v. Sahi Ram

27 Sep 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that non-production of the entire seized contraband is not fatal if seizure and samples are proved beyond doubt, restoring conviction under the NDPS Act with modified sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act contraband material seizure production of evidence

Shivkishan v. Sujata Tarachand Makhija

27 Sep 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court upheld that a cooperative society applicant becomes a deemed member if no decision is communicated within three months, and quashed an illegal plot allotment made in violation of an injunction and procedure.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 deemed membership plot allotment interim injunction

Shivkishan v. Sujata Tarachand Makhija

27 Sep 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court upheld that a member who becomes deemed member by non-communication of membership decision has preferential right to plot allotment, quashing an illegal allotment and sale deed made in violation of court injunction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 deemed membership plot allotment Cooperative Housing Society

Guru @ Gurubaran & Ors. v. State Rep. by Insp. of Police

27 Sep 2019 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court upheld murder convictions for the main accused while reducing one accused's conviction to a lesser offence, clarifying the applicability of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC and individual liability in absence of common intention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 324 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC culpable homicide

Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi

27 Sep 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court upheld the classification of imported goods as a composite apparatus under Note 4 to Section XVI and affirmed inclusion of embedded software value in customs valuation under Rule 9 of the 1988 Rules, dismissing the appellant's challenge.

customs appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Valuation Classification Note 4 to Section XVI Embedded Software

Kanna Timma Kanaji Madiwal v. Ramachandra Timmaya Hegde

27 Sep 2019 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a Will bequeathing tenancy rights to a legitimate heir is valid under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, and allowed occupancy rights accordingly, setting aside the High Court's contrary orders.

property appeal_allowed Significant Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 tenancy rights bequeath Will

Syeda Nazira Khatoon v. Syed Zahiruddin Ahmed Baghdadi

26 Sep 2019 · N.V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that a mutawalli cannot transfer his office by trust deed contrary to the wakf deed, and succession to mutawalliship follows male lineal descendants as per the wakf deed, dismissing the appeal of the widow claiming mutawalliship.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mutawalli wakf deed transfer of office trust deed