Supreme Court of India
16,355 judgments
Pruthvirajsinh Nodhubha Jadeja v. Jayeshkumar Chhakaddas Shah
The Supreme Court held that an assignee of the original plaintiff's interest is entitled to be impleaded as plaintiff under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC despite withdrawal by original plaintiff's heirs, dismissing the appeal against such impleadment.
Pruthvirajsinh Nodhubha Jadeja v. Jayeshkumar Chhakaddas Shah
The Supreme Court held that a purchaser who acquires rights during the pendency of a suit is entitled to be impleaded as plaintiff under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC despite withdrawal by original plaintiff's heirs.
RAVI SETIA v. MADAN LAL
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the High Court's order denying specific performance due to the plaintiff's failure to prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations.
RAVI SETIA v. MADAN LAL
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal for specific performance due to the plaintiff's failure to prove readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations, ordering refund of earnest money.
M/S. MADHOOR BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. v. YEOLA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a writ petition seeking payment under a centrally sponsored sewerage scheme due to lack of sanctioned funds, directing the State Government to consider and approve the project funding within a stipulated time.
Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. v. K.S. Infraspace LLP
The Supreme Court held that a dispute involving immovable property not actually used exclusively in trade or commerce does not qualify as a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and thus the Commercial Court lacked jurisdiction.
L BOBBY JOSEPH v. Union of India & Ors
The Supreme Court held that a valid substantive promotion order entitles an officer to pension at the promoted rank despite reckonable service shortfall and awarded compensation for avoidable litigation.
L BOBBY JOSEPH v. Union of India & Ors
The Supreme Court held that a valid substantive promotion order entitles an officer to pension at the promoted rank despite shortfall in reckonable service and awarded compensation for avoidable litigation.
Yatinkumar Jasubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court upheld the permissibility of institutional preference up to 50% in Post Graduate Medical admissions despite the introduction of NEET, dismissing challenges that such preference violates the Medical Council Act and Regulations.
Yatinkumar Jasubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of institutional preference up to 50% in postgraduate medical admissions, ruling that NEET does not invalidate such preference provided admissions are merit-based.
Kerala State Beverages (M and M) Corporation Limited v. P.P. Suresh & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the State's modification of a rehabilitation policy for displaced arrack workers was a valid exercise of discretion in overriding public interest, rejecting claims of vested rights and legitimate expectation to employment.
Ramesh Nivrutti Bhagwat v. Dr. Surendra Manohar Parakhe
The Supreme Court held that the three-year limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies to revocation of letters of administration granted under Section 228 of the Indian Succession Act, running from the date of grant, and dismissed the appeal as time barred.
Ramesh Nivrutti Bhagwat v. Dr. Surendra Manohar Parakhe
The Supreme Court held that the three-year limitation under Article 137 applies to revocation of letters of administration granted under Section 228 of the Indian Succession Act, starting from the date of grant, and dismissed the appeal for being time barred and for lack of locus standi.
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Danish Khan
The Supreme Court upheld Regulation 4(3) of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Compassionate Appointment Regulations, holding it a reasonable classification that disqualifies dependents who have claimed compensation from the Corporation from seeking compassionate appointment, thereby not violating Article 14.
Duncans Industries Ltd. v. A. J. Agrochem
The Supreme Court held that insolvency proceedings under Section 9 of the IBC are maintainable without prior Central Government consent under Section 16G(1)(c) of the Tea Act, as the IBC overrides the Tea Act and insolvency proceedings differ from winding up.
C/M Kisan Inter College Manager v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the regularization of a teacher's service based on continuous employment despite initial irregular appointment, dismissing the college's appeal against the High Court's order.
C/M Kisan Inter College Manager v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the regularization of a teacher's service based on continuous employment despite initial procedural irregularities, dismissing the college's appeal challenging the same.
Okhla Enclave Plot Holders’ Welfare Association v. Union of India and Others
The Supreme Court directed proportionate payment of development charges by eligible allottees, upheld the Colonizer's liability for license fees and expenses, and empowered the arbitrator to finalize allotments under the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975.
Okhla Enclave Plot Holders’ Welfare Association v. Union of India and Others
The Supreme Court directed proportionate apportionment of development charges among eligible allottees, mandated payment of outstanding license fees by the Colonizer, and empowered the DTCP to complete development and transfer titles under the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975.
State of West Bengal v. Calcutta Club Limited
The Supreme Court held that supply of food and drinks by incorporated members’ clubs to their permanent members does not constitute a sale liable to sales tax, affirming the continued applicability of the doctrine of mutuality post the 46th Amendment.