Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. (Biscuit Division) v. State of Maharashtra

25 Sep 2019 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 801
Cites 0 · Cited by 42

The Supreme Court held that failure of the appropriate Government to pass a reasoned order within 60 days on an application for closure under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act results in deemed permission to close, and communications by unauthorized officers do not constitute valid orders.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25-O closure of industrial establishment deemed permission

Nevada Properties Private Limited v. State of Maharashtra and Another

24 Sep 2019 · Sanjiv Khanna; Deepak Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that police officers under Section 102(1) CrPC have the power to seize only movable property and not immovable property during criminal investigations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 102 CrPC seizure of property immovable property movable property

Dina Nath v. Subhash Chand Saini

24 Sep 2019 · Arun Mishra; M. R. Shah; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that the power to strike out a tenant's defence under Section 15(7) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 is discretionary and must be exercised judiciously, setting aside the order striking out the defence where the tenant had complied with rent payment orders.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 15(7) strike out defence discretionary power

Dina Nath v. Subhash Chand Saini

24 Sep 2019 · Arun Mishra; M. R. Shah; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that the power to strike out a tenant's defence under Section 15(7) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 is discretionary and must be exercised judiciously, setting aside orders that struck out the defence despite the tenant having paid rent arrears and advance rent.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 15(7) strike out defence discretionary power

State of Goa & Anr. v. Dr. Alvaro Alberto Mousinho De Noronha Ferreira

24 Sep 2019 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose · 2019 INSC 1075

Conversion charges for land use change under Goa law are payable based on rates applicable on the date of grant of permission, not the date of application, and voluntary acceptance precludes refund claims.

property appeal_allowed Significant conversion charges land use conversion Goa Land Revenue Code Section 32

State of Goa & Anr. v. Dr. Alvaro Alberto Mousinho de Noronha Ferreira

24 Sep 2019 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that conversion charges for land use change are payable based on rates applicable on the date of the order granting permission, not the date of application, and upheld the levy of enhanced charges after statutory timelines and consent by the landowner.

property appeal_allowed Significant conversion charges land use conversion Goa Land Revenue Code Section 32

M/S BAGALKOT UDYOG LIMITED v. SHIVASHANKARGOUDA

24 Sep 2019 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose · 2019 INSC 1076

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's remand directing the Executing Court to determine whether the execution order exceeded the decree, affirming that execution must strictly conform to the decree and can be challenged under Section 115 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant execution of decree specific performance Section 115 CPC Order XXI Rule 106 CPC

M/S BAGALKOT UDYOG LIMITED v. SHIVASHANKARGOUDA

24 Sep 2019 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order remanding the matter to the Executing Court to determine whether the execution of a lease renewal decree exceeded its scope, dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance execution of decree lease renewal Section 115 CPC

Shri Subir Bose v. Inspector of Factories

24 Sep 2019 · Indu Malhotra; Sanjiv Khanna · 2019 INSC 1073

The Supreme Court accepted the Managing Director’s plea of guilt for operating a factory without licence under the Factories Act, imposed a fine, and disposed of the appeal in the interest of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Factories Act, 1948 Section 92 Factories Act Factory licence Safety measures

Shri Subir Bose v. Inspector of Factories

24 Sep 2019 · Indu Malhotra; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court accepted the Managing Director's plea of guilt for operating a factory without licence under the Factories Act, imposed a fine, and avoided imprisonment considering the minor injury and delay in trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Factories Act, 1948 Section 92 Factories Act Goa Factories Rules, 1945 Operating without licence

Govindbhai Chhotabhai Patel v. Patel Ramanbhai Mathurbhai

23 Sep 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a gift deed executed by a father over self-acquired property received by will, holding no specific denial of execution was made to mandate attesting witness examination under Section 68 of the Evidence Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant gift deed ancestral property self-acquired property Section 68 Indian Evidence Act

M/S. CANARA NIDHI LIMITED v. M. SHASHIKALA AND OTHERS

23 Sep 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that Section 34 applications to set aside arbitral awards are summary proceedings relying primarily on the arbitral record, disallowing fresh evidence and cross-examination except in exceptional cases, and set aside the High Court's order permitting such evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act summary proceedings fresh evidence arbitral award

State of UP v. Vinod Kumar Katheria

23 Sep 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court set aside a dismissal order of a government employee due to denial of natural justice in disciplinary enquiry and remanded the matter for fresh enquiry with directions for reinstatement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings natural justice enquiry dismissal from service

State of UP v. Vinod Kumar Katheria

23 Sep 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal of a government employee due to procedural lapses in disciplinary enquiry and remanded the matter for a fresh enquiry with reinstatement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary enquiry natural justice opportunity to be heard dismissal from service

Authorised Officer, Indian Bank v. D. Visalakshi

23 Sep 2019 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that the Chief Judicial Magistrate in non-metropolitan areas is competent under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to assist secured creditors in taking possession of secured assets, interpreting 'Chief Metropolitan Magistrate' to include the CJM.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 14 SARFAESI Act Chief Judicial Magistrate Chief Metropolitan Magistrate District Magistrate

Kanchan Dua v. Union of India & Anr.

23 Sep 2019 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA

The Supreme Court held that death due to natural causes during active service in a notified operation does not entitle the family to Liberalised Family Pension, limiting it to deaths caused by injuries sustained in live action.

military_pension/administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Liberalised Family Pension Armed Forces pension rules Operation Rakshak death due to cardiac failure

D. Sasi Kumar v. Soundararajan

23 Sep 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court restored the eviction order in favor of the landlord, holding that bonafide requirement for eviction is to be assessed as of the petition date and the High Court erred in reappreciating evidence in the revision petition.

property appeal_allowed Significant bonafide requirement eviction rent control Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960

D. Sasi Kumar v. Soundararajan

23 Sep 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court allowed the landlord's appeal, holding that bona fide requirement for eviction under the Tamil Nadu Rent Control Act is to be assessed at the petition filing date and that the High Court erred in reappreciating evidence in the Civil Revision Petition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant bona fide requirement eviction rent control Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Sanjiv Gupta & Others

23 Sep 2019 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that Alchemist must comply with its 2012 order to pay Rs. 4.5 crores to Kotak Mahindra Bank from sale proceeds, rejecting non-compliance based on pending modification applications and closing contempt proceedings upon deposit of the amount.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court SARFAESI Act sale of secured assets interim order compliance

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Sanjiv Gupta & Others

23 Sep 2019 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that Alchemist must comply with its 2012 order to pay Rs. 4.5 crores to Kotak Mahindra Bank from sale proceeds, and failure to do so without modification constitutes contempt, but allowed deposit in Court to close contempt proceedings pending High Court adjudication.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court SARFAESI Act interim order sale proceeds