Supreme Court of India
16,356 judgments
State of Odisha v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that transportation of legally procured and royalty paid iron ore by a purchaser from within a mining lease area is not a mining operation and allowed JSPL to transport the ore subject to compliance by the mining leaseholder.
Canara Bank v. P. Selathal
Civil suits challenging Debt Recovery Tribunal decrees are barred under the RDDBFI Act and liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC when statutory remedies are available and fraud allegations are illusory.
Canara Bank v. P. Selathal
Civil suits challenging a Debt Recovery Tribunal decree are barred under the RDDBFI Act and liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC if vexatious and without proper pleadings of fraud.
Kirti Vijayvargiya v. Rahul Vijayvargiya
The Supreme Court annulled the marriage of the parties and disposed of their matrimonial disputes upon their mutual settlement under Article 142 of the Constitution.
Kirti Vijayvargiya v. Rahul Vijayvargiya
The Supreme Court annulled the marriage of the parties under Article 142 following their amicable settlement and disposed of all related proceedings accordingly.
BANK OF INDIA v. M/S. BRINDAVAN AGRO INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.
The Supreme Court held that a bank's processing fees and TEV charges debited before loan sanction are valid if authorized and known to the customer, setting aside consumer fora orders directing full refund.
State of Odisha v. Sri Satya Narayan Behura
The Supreme Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration of the respondent's entitlement to financial upgradation under the RACP Scheme, emphasizing the need for thorough adjudication of all contentions and material.
State of Odisha & Ors. v. Sri Satya Narayan Behura
The Supreme Court remanded the dispute over financial upgradation under the RACP Scheme for fresh consideration by the High Court after allowing additional evidence and submissions.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that electricity tariff circulars issued by the State Electricity Board before the Regulatory Commission's constitution are valid and cannot be retrospectively quashed, and refunds ordered without merit consideration may cause unjust enrichment.
SHRI PARESHBHAI AMRUTLAL PATEL v. THE STATE OF GUJARAT
The Supreme Court directed transfer and joint trial of two complaints involving the same cheque to avoid conflicting decisions, refusing to quash the later FIR but ensuring consolidated adjudication.
SHRI PARESHBHAI AMRUTLAL PATEL v. THE STATE OF GUJARAT
The Supreme Court directed transfer of FIR proceedings to the court where an earlier cheque bounce complaint is pending for joint hearing, refusing to quash the FIR.
District Bar Association, Dehradun v. Ishwar Shandilya & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that advocates have no right to strike or boycott courts as it obstructs justice, amounts to contempt, and violates fundamental rights, upholding the High Court’s directions restraining such strikes.
District Bar Association, Dehradun v. Ishwar Shandilya & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that advocates have no right to strike or boycott courts as it obstructs justice and upheld the High Court’s directions restraining such strikes, emphasizing the duty of Bar Councils to discipline errant advocates.
Commissioner, Directorate of Logistics v. M/s. Almighty Techserv
The Supreme Court granted interim relief allowing the government to proceed with the tender awarded to M/s. ASVA Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd. for urgent procurement, subject to withholding disputed amounts pending final hearing.
Bagawe v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's withdrawal of pay scale benefits granted under a 2004 resolution, clarified entitlement under the 1995 resolution, and limited recovery of excess payments to amounts received after the final tribunal order in 2014.
Bagawe v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's withdrawal of pay scale benefits granted to Junior Clerks, allowing recovery of excess payments only from the date of final adjudication, balancing executive authority and employee rights.
Arun Kumar Gupta v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
The Supreme Court upheld the compulsory retirement of two judicial officers, affirming that such orders are non-punitive, require bona fide public interest, consider entire service records including adverse entries, and are subject to limited judicial review.
Tulsi Narayan Garg v. M.P. Road Development Authority
The Supreme Court held that recovery of liquidated damages as arrears of land revenue is impermissible pending arbitration under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, and quashed the High Court's order permitting such recovery.
a241b015cd31691baa5ede53643fb34eb9276599cad4b42abf1ab20a0a96fe02
The Supreme Court held that mortgage transactions by a corporate debtor securing debts of its holding company are not preferential transactions under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code when made in the ordinary course of business.
c0397a473822e5afb678a3e856f53c8ae4ed135067b6c3595949afa274c9d787
The Supreme Court held that mortgage transactions by a corporate debtor securing loans of its holding company are not preferential under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code when made in the ordinary course of business, allowing the lenders to retain their security interests.